Paper · 2014 · AMERICAN-EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE

The Use of Biochar Fortified Compost on Calcareous Soil of East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia: 2. Effect on the Yield of Maize (Zea Mays l) and Phosphate Absorption

Mahmuddin Nur; Titiek Islami; Eko Handayanto; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was carried out to study the effect of compost fortified with biochar on the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.), and phosphorus absorption. The experiment was done on calcareous soil of East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia with the treatment of 8 organic amendment application: (1) Farm Yard Manure (FYM) compost. (2) FYM compost + biochar, (3) biochar fortified FYM compost 3/1, (4) Biochar fortified FYM compost 1/1, (5) Siam weed (Chromolaenaodorata L.) compost, (6) biochar fortified Siam weed compost 3/1, (7) biochar fortifiedSiam weed compost, and (8) without compost as the control. These 8 treatments were arranged in a Randomize Block Design with 3 replications. The experiment was done in Januari – April 2013 for rainy season/first maize) and in April – June 2013 (for dry season/second maize). The first maize used was BISI-hybrid cv, and the second maize was Genjah Madura (a short mature local variety from Madura Island, Indonesia). The results showed that application of biochar fortified compost increased the yield of both the rainy and dry season maize on calcareous soil. The use of biochar fortified compost improved the positive impact of both compost and biochar. It did not increase pH of calcareous soil, can maintain the value of compost as plant nutrient resources and the recalcitrant of organic carbon possessed by biochar. Application of fortified biochar decreased un-available phosphate, increased available phosphate, and hence increased the absorption of phosphate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar-fortified compost increased yield of rainy and dry season maize on calcareous soil relative to no compost

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
application of biochar fortified composte1
Outcome
yield of both the rainy and dry season maizee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
without composte2
Setting
calcareous soil of East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesiae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of compost fortified with biochar on the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of biochar fortified compost increased the yield of both the rainy and dry season maize on calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1106 · show in text ↑
e2

“without compost as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–604 · show in text ↑
e3

“The experiment was done on calcareous soil of East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar-fortified compost improved the positive impact of compost and biochar on maize

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
biochar fortified composte4
Outcome
positive impacte4
Direction
improvede4
Comparator
both compost and biochare4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of compost fortified with biochar on the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–133 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of biochar fortified compost improved the positive impact of both compost and biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar-fortified compost did not increase pH of calcareous soil

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
biochar fortified composte4
Outcome
pH of calcareous soile5
Direction
did not increasee5
Qualifier
the recalcitrant of organic carbon possessed by biochare5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of compost fortified with biochar on the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–133 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of biochar fortified compost improved the positive impact of both compost and biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1201 · show in text ↑
e5

“It did not increase pH of calcareous soil, can maintain the value of compost as plant nutrient resources and the recalcitrant of organic carbon possessed by biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1367 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar-fortified compost can maintain the value of compost as plant nutrient resources

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
value of compost as plant nutrient resourcese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of compost fortified with biochar on the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–133 · show in text ↑
e5

“It did not increase pH of calcareous soil, can maintain the value of compost as plant nutrient resources and the recalcitrant of organic carbon possessed by biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fortified biochar decreased unavailable phosphate in calcareous soil

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Application of fortified biochare6
Outcome
un-available phosphatee6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of compost fortified with biochar on the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–133 · show in text ↑
e6

“Application of fortified biochar decreased un-available phosphate, increased available phosphate, and hence increased the absorption of phosphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fortified biochar increased available phosphate in calcareous soil

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Application of fortified biochare6
Outcome
available phosphatee6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of compost fortified with biochar on the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–133 · show in text ↑
e6

“Application of fortified biochar decreased un-available phosphate, increased available phosphate, and hence increased the absorption of phosphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fortified biochar increased phosphate absorption by maize

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Application of fortified biochare6
Outcome
absorption of phosphatee6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of compost fortified with biochar on the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–133 · show in text ↑
e6

“Application of fortified biochar decreased un-available phosphate, increased available phosphate, and hence increased the absorption of phosphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1514 · show in text ↑

biochar · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

biochar · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 64 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

123 papers: 116 positive, 7 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

biochar · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 175 positive, 18 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

339 papers: 303 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 303 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

335 papers more in this group

See all 339 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.