Paper · 1996 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Drying and Storage Method to Prolong Seed Viability and Seedling Vigour of Rabi‐summer‐produced Groundnut

P. C Nautiyal; V. Ravindra

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Rabi‐summer‐produced (dry season, February–May) groundnut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) cv. GG 2 was dried using three different methods, viz. windrow (W), windrow‐shade (WS) and DOR (Directorate of Oilseeds Research) methods and stored in polyethylene lined gunny bags with or without desiccant (CaCl 2 or silica gel, 10gkg −1 pods). The seeds were analysed for the retentation of seed viability, seedling vigour, membrane integrity and Held emergence during storage, and crop stand and pod yield after 12 months of storage. The drying and storage method significantly affected the getminability, seedling vigour and field emergence. Both root length and seedling biomass were adversely affected due to windrow drying (W) The quick loss of viability in the W treatment was associated with an increase in electrical conductivity of the seed leachate. The retention of higher seed viabiliry and vigour in the seeds dried by DOR method and stored with CaCl 2 (DOR C) was due to lower drying remperarures and lower pod moisture during the initial storage period. The DOR C method was found to be an effective drying and storage method for retaining acceptable seed viability and vigour till the following rabi‐summer sowing of groundnut.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drying and storage method significantly affected groundnut germinability, seedling vigour, and field emergence.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
drying and storage methode0
Outcome
getminability, seedling vigour and field emergencee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The drying and storage method significantly affected the getminability, seedling vigour and field emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–636 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Windrow drying adversely affected groundnut root length and seedling biomass.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
windrow drying (W)e0
Outcome
root length and seedling biomasse0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both root length and seedling biomass were adversely affected due to windrow drying (W)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–724 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quick loss of groundnut seed viability with windrow drying was associated with increased electrical conductivity of seed leachate.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
W treatmente0
Outcome
viabilitye0
Direction
quick losse0
Qualifier
increase in electrical conductivity of the seed leachatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quick loss of viability in the W treatment was associated with an increase in electrical conductivity of the seed leachate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–852 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DOR drying with CaCl 2 storage retained higher groundnut seed viability and vigour.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
dried by DOR method and stored with CaCl 2 (DOR C)e0
Outcome
seed viabiliry and vigoure0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The retention of higher seed viabiliry and vigour in the seeds dried by DOR method and stored with CaCl 2 (DOR C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–966 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–89 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The DOR C method retained acceptable seed viability and vigour until the next rabi-summer sowing.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
seed viability and vigoure0
Qualifier
till the following rabi‐summer sowinge0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DOR C method was found to be an effective drying and storage method for retaining acceptable seed viability and vigour till the following rabi‐summer sowing of groundnut.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1236 · show in text ↑

wind · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

processing · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

storage · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.