Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Insect Science

Effectiveness of Spinosad against Diamondback Moth (Plutella xylostella L.) Eggs and Larvae on Cabbage under Botswana Conditions

Mitch M. Legwaila; David C. Munthali; Motshwari Obopile; et al.

3
claims
9
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The efficacy of spinosad against the diamondback moth (DBM) on cabbage was studied at Botswana College of Agriculture, Gaborone, Botswana in 2011. Using five concentrations of spinosad: 0.12, 0.36, 0.60, 0.84 and 1.08 g/L, bioassays were conducted against DBM eggs and second instar larvae at 30°C ± 5°C. Each treatment was replicated three times. Probit analysis was used to determine LD 50 and LD 90 values for the treatments against eggs and larvae. When the treatments were assessed at 72 and 96 hours, LD 90 values against larvae were 0.74 and 0.59 g/L, whereas they were 0.35 and 0.32 g/L against eggs. This indicated that spinosad was more effective against eggs than against larvae. The slopes of the probit lines for larvae assessed at 48, 72 and 96 hours after application were 3.519, 3.810 and 3.427, while those against eggs were 1.725, 1.316 and 1.086. This indicates that there was a more rapid change in larval mortality with increase in pesticide dosage than in egg mortality. The study shows that spinosad can achieve effective control of DBM eggs and larvae under Botswana conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad was more effective against diamondback moth eggs than against larvae, with LD90 values of 0.35 and 0.32 g/L for eggs versus 0.74 and 0.59 g/L for larvae.

Treatment
spinosade1
Interactor
diamondback mothPlutella xylostellae1pest
Outcome
effective against eggse2
Direction
more effectivee2
Value
0.35 and 0.32 g/Le3
Qualifier
72 and 96 hourse4
Comparator
larvaee2
Setting
Botswana College of Agriculture, Gaborone, Botswanae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plutella xylostella
Plutella xylostella · InteractorPlease report references to olei@despammed.com . · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of spinosad against the diamondback moth (DBM) on cabbage was studied at Botswana College of Agriculture, Gaborone, Botswana in 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e2

“This indicated that spinosad was more effective against eggs than against larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–689 · show in text ↑
e3

“LD 90 values against larvae were 0.74 and 0.59 g/L, whereas they were 0.35 and 0.32 g/L against eggs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–607 · show in text ↑
e4

“When the treatments were assessed at 72 and 96 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–505 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larval mortality changed more rapidly with spinosad dose than egg mortality, with probit slopes of 3.519, 3.810 and 3.427 for larvae versus 1.725, 1.316 and 1.086 for eggs.

Treatment
increase in pesticide dosagee6
Interactor
diamondback mothPlutella xylostellae1pest
Outcome
change in larval mortalitye6
Direction
more rapide6
Value
3.519, 3.810 and 3.427e5
Comparator
egg mortalitye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plutella xylostella
Plutella xylostella · InteractorPlease report references to olei@despammed.com . · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of spinosad against the diamondback moth (DBM) on cabbage was studied at Botswana College of Agriculture, Gaborone, Botswana in 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e5

“The slopes of the probit lines for larvae assessed at 48, 72 and 96 hours after application were 3.519, 3.810 and 3.427, while those against eggs were 1.725, 1.316 and 1.086”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–864 · show in text ↑
e6

“This indicates that there was a more rapid change in larval mortality with increase in pesticide dosage than in egg mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad can achieve effective control of diamondback moth eggs and larvae under Botswana conditions.

Treatment
spinosade7
Interactor
DBMe7pest
Outcome
effective control of DBM eggs and larvaee7
Setting
Botswana conditionse7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of spinosad against the diamondback moth (DBM) on cabbage was studied at Botswana College of Agriculture, Gaborone, Botswana in 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145 · show in text ↑
e7

“The study shows that spinosad can achieve effective control of DBM eggs and larvae under Botswana conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1101 · show in text ↑

spinosad · Plutella xylostella · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

spinosad · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.