Paper · 2010 · Plant Disease

Reduced Sensitivity in Monilinia fructicola Field Isolates from South Carolina and Georgia to Respiration Inhibitor Fungicides

A. Amiri; P. M. Brannen; G. Schnabel

12
claims
37
verbatim quotes
73
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Quinone outside inhibitor (QoI) and succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SdhI) fungicides are respiration inhibitors (RIs) used for preharvest control of brown rot of stone fruit. Both chemical classes are site-specific and, thus, prone to resistance development. Between 2006 and 2008, 157 isolates of Monilinia fructicola collected from multiple peach and nectarine orchards with or without RI spray history in South Carolina and Georgia were characterized based upon conidial germination and mycelial growth inhibition for their sensitivity to QoI fungicides azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin, SdhI fungicide boscalid, and a mixture of pyraclostrobin + boscalid. There was no significant difference (P = 0.05) between EC 50 values for inhibition of conidial germination versus mycelial growth. The mean EC 50 values based upon mycelial growth tests for 25 isolates from an orchard without RI-spray history were 0.15, 0.06, 2.23, and 0.09 μg/ml for azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, boscalid, and pyraclostrobin + boscalid, respectively. The respective mean EC 50 values for 76 isolates from RI-sprayed orchards in South Carolina were 0.9, 0.1, 10.7, and 0.13 μg/ml and for 56 isolates from RI-sprayed orchards in Georgia were 1.2, 0.1, 8.91, and 0.17 μg/ml. Overall, mean EC 50 values of populations from RI-sprayed orchards increased three-, two-, five-, and twofold between 2006 and 2008 for azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, boscalid, and pyraclostrobin + boscalid, respectively. A subset of 10 M. fructicola isolates representing low and high EC 50 values for azoxystrobin, boscalid, and boscalid + pyraclostrobin was selected for a detached fruit assay to determine disease incidence and severity following protective treatments of formulated RI fungicides at label rates. Brown rot incidence was greater than 50% when fruit were inoculated with isolates having EC 50 values of 2, 4, and 0.6 μg/ml for azoxystrobin, boscalid, and pyraclostrobin + boscalid, respectively. Pyraclostrobin failed to control any of the isolates tested in detached fruit assays. Based on minimum inhibitory concentration and brown rot incidence data, we recommend using 3 and 0.75 μg/ml as discriminatory doses to distinguish between sensitive isolates and those with reduced sensitivity to azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin + boscalid, respectively. Results from our in vitro and in vivo assays indicate a shift toward reduced sensitivity in M. fructicola from the southeastern United States. No cross-resistance was observed between the QoI and the SdhI fungicides, which implies that rotation or tank mixtures of these two chemical classes can be used as a resistance management strategy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conidial germination and mycelial growth inhibition gave no significant difference in EC 50 estimates.

Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
EC 50 values for inhibition of conidial germination versus mycelial growthe1
Direction
no significant differencee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peach and nectarine orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–374 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no significant difference (P = 0.05) between EC 50 values for inhibition of conidial germination versus mycelial growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin EC 50 was 0.15 μg/ml in an unsprayed orchard, 0.9 in South Carolina sprayed orchards, and 1.2 in Georgia sprayed orchards.

Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
EC 50 valuese1
Value
0.15e1
Qualifier
azoxystrobine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peach and nectarine orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–374 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean EC 50 values based upon mycelial growth tests for 25 isolates from an orchard without RI-spray history were 0.15, 0.06, 2.23, and 0.09 μg/ml for azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, boscalid, and pyraclostrobin + boscalid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–1030 · show in text ↑
e2

“The respective mean EC 50 values for 76 isolates from RI-sprayed orchards in South Carolina were 0.9, 0.1, 10.7, and 0.13 μg/ml and for 56 isolates from RI-sprayed orchards in Georgia were 1.2, 0.1, 8.91, and 0.17 μg/ml”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean EC 50 of azoxystrobin in sprayed orchard populations increased threefold over 2006–2008.

Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
mean EC 50 valuese1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
azoxystrobine1
Setting
RI-sprayed orchardse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peach and nectarine orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–374 · show in text ↑
e1

“Overall, mean EC 50 values of populations from RI-sprayed orchards increased three-, two-, five-, and twofold between 2006 and 2008 for azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, boscalid, and pyraclostrobin + boscalid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean EC 50 of pyraclostrobin in sprayed orchard populations increased twofold over 2006–2008.

Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
mean EC 50 valuese1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
pyraclostrobine1
Setting
RI-sprayed orchardse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peach and nectarine orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–374 · show in text ↑
e1

“Overall, mean EC 50 values of populations from RI-sprayed orchards increased three-, two-, five-, and twofold between 2006 and 2008 for azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, boscalid, and pyraclostrobin + boscalid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean EC 50 of boscalid in sprayed orchard populations increased fivefold over 2006–2008.

Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
mean EC 50 valuese1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
boscalide1
Setting
RI-sprayed orchardse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peach and nectarine orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–374 · show in text ↑
e1

“Overall, mean EC 50 values of populations from RI-sprayed orchards increased three-, two-, five-, and twofold between 2006 and 2008 for azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, boscalid, and pyraclostrobin + boscalid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean EC 50 of pyraclostrobin plus boscalid in sprayed orchard populations increased twofold over 2006–2008.

Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
mean EC 50 valuese1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
pyraclostrobin + boscalide1
Setting
RI-sprayed orchardse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peach and nectarine orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–374 · show in text ↑
e1

“Overall, mean EC 50 values of populations from RI-sprayed orchards increased three-, two-, five-, and twofold between 2006 and 2008 for azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, boscalid, and pyraclostrobin + boscalid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown rot incidence exceeded 50% after inoculation with isolates having the specified EC 50 thresholds.

Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
Brown rot incidencee1
Direction
greater thane1
Value
50%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peach and nectarine orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–374 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brown rot incidence was greater than 50% when fruit were inoculated with isolates having EC 50 values of 2, 4, and 0.6 μg/ml for azoxystrobin, boscalid, and pyraclostrobin + boscalid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyraclostrobin failed to control any tested isolates in detached fruit assays.

Treatment
Pyraclostrobine1
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
control any of the isolatese1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peach and nectarine orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–374 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pyraclostrobin failed to control any of the isolates tested in detached fruit assays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1967–2051 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–43 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 3 μg/ml to distinguish azoxystrobin-sensitive isolates from less sensitive ones.

Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
discriminatory doses to distinguish between sensitive isolates and those with reduced sensitivitye1
Qualifier
azoxystrobine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peach and nectarine orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–374 · show in text ↑
e1

“we recommend using 3 and 0.75 μg/ml as discriminatory doses to distinguish between sensitive isolates and those with reduced sensitivity to azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin + boscalid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2125–2321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–43 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 0.75 μg/ml to distinguish pyraclostrobin plus boscalid-sensitive isolates from less sensitive ones.

Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
discriminatory doses to distinguish between sensitive isolates and those with reduced sensitivitye1
Qualifier
pyraclostrobin + boscalide1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peach and nectarine orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–374 · show in text ↑
e1

“we recommend using 3 and 0.75 μg/ml as discriminatory doses to distinguish between sensitive isolates and those with reduced sensitivity to azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin + boscalid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2125–2321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No cross-resistance was seen between QoI and SdhI fungicides.

Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
cross-resistancee1
Direction
Noe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peach and nectarine orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–374 · show in text ↑
e1

“No cross-resistance was observed between the QoI and the SdhI fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2466–2538 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–43 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest rotation or tank mixtures of QoI and SdhI fungicides for resistance management.

Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
rotation or tank mixtures of these two chemical classes can be used as a resistance management strategye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peach and nectarine orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–374 · show in text ↑
e1

“rotation or tank mixtures of these two chemical classes can be used as a resistance management strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2559–2662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–43 · show in text ↑

pyraclostrobin · Monilinia fructicola · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.