Abstract
Pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) – mustard (Brassica juncea L.) is an important cropping system of limited water and marginal land areas grown under improper crop establishment and imbalanced fertilization. Conservation tillage with integrated nutrient management (INM) has potential to improve productivity, maintain soil health and economic sustainability. In present study the response of different tillage and INM on yield, production efficiency, carbon sustainability index (CSI) and economics of pearlmillet and mustard grown during 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 at IARI, New Delhi(India) was evaluated. During all the season’s ridge-furrow sowing resulted considerable improvement in growth and yield of pearlmillet and mustard. Pearlmillet and mustard produced higher yield (2.62 and 1.21 t ha-1), pearlmillet equivalent yield (PEY) (6.52 t ha-1) and production efficiency (31.04 kg ha-1day-1) when sown in ridge-furrow. Application of 30 kg N and 20 kg P2O5ha-1 along with FYM @ 6 t ha-1 recorded higher yield (2.75 and 1.31 t ha-1) of pearlmillet and mustard, respectively as their residual effect. However, in mustard application of 60 kg N and 40 kg P2O5 ha-1 resulted highest yield (1.30 t ha-1), PEY (6.66 t ha-1) and production efficiency (31.74 kg ha-1 day-1). Net returns and CSI were highest (US $572.4 & 21.92 and 603.4 & 20.02 ha-1) in ridge and furrow and preceding application of 30 kg N and 20 kg P2O5 ha-1along with FYM @ 6 t ha-1, respectively. In mustard CSI was highest in control (21.84) and net returns (US $ 571.7 ha-1) were highest with highest nutrient level. This study indicates that pearlmillet and mustard can be grown under ridge furrow sowing with INM for sustaining soil health and higher farm profitability. Key words: Carbon sustainability index, economic returns, equivalent yield, farm yard manure, production efficiency, residual effect.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Ridge-furrow sowing considerably improved growth and yield of pearl millet and mustard.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet and mustarde1
- Treatment
- ridge-furrow sowinge1
- Outcome
- growth and yielde1
- Direction
- improvemente1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“During all the season’s ridge-furrow sowing resulted considerable improvement in growth and yield of pearlmillet and mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
Pearl millet yield was higher under ridge-furrow sowing (2.62 t ha-1).
- Taxon
- Pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanuse2 - Treatment
- ridge-furrowe2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 2.62e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Pearlmillet and mustard produced higher yield (2.62 and 1.21 t ha-1), pearlmillet equivalent yield (PEY) (6.52 t ha-1) and production efficiency (31.04 kg ha-1day-1) when sown in ridge-furrow”
Claim · model-written summary
Mustard yield was higher under ridge-furrow sowing (1.21 t ha-1).
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e2“Pearlmillet and mustard produced higher yield (2.62 and 1.21 t ha-1), pearlmillet equivalent yield (PEY) (6.52 t ha-1) and production efficiency (31.04 kg ha-1day-1) when sown in ridge-furrow”
Claim · model-written summary
Pearl millet equivalent yield was 6.52 t ha-1 under ridge-furrow sowing.
- Taxon
- PearlmilletCenchrus americanuse2
- Treatment
- ridge-furrowe2
- Outcome
- pearlmillet equivalent yield (PEY)e2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 6.52e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Pearlmillet and mustard produced higher yield (2.62 and 1.21 t ha-1), pearlmillet equivalent yield (PEY) (6.52 t ha-1) and production efficiency (31.04 kg ha-1day-1) when sown in ridge-furrow”
Claim · model-written summary
Production efficiency under ridge-furrow sowing was 31.04 kg ha-1 day-1.
- Taxon
- PearlmilletCenchrus americanuse2
- Treatment
- ridge-furrowe2
- Outcome
- production efficiencye2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 31.04e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Pearlmillet and mustard produced higher yield (2.62 and 1.21 t ha-1), pearlmillet equivalent yield (PEY) (6.52 t ha-1) and production efficiency (31.04 kg ha-1day-1) when sown in ridge-furrow”
Claim · model-written summary
Pearl millet yield was higher with 30 kg N and 20 kg P2O5 ha-1 plus FYM as residual effect (2.75 t ha-1).
- Taxon
- pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse3
- Treatment
- Application of 30 kg N and 20 kg P2O5ha-1 along with FYM @ 6 t ha-1e3
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 2.75e3
- Qualifier
- residual effecte3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Application of 30 kg N and 20 kg P2O5ha-1 along with FYM @ 6 t ha-1 recorded higher yield (2.75 and 1.31 t ha-1) of pearlmillet and mustard, respectively as their residual effect”
Claim · model-written summary
Mustard yield was higher with 30 kg N and 20 kg P2O5 ha-1 plus FYM as residual effect (1.31 t ha-1).
- Taxon
- mustarde3
- Treatment
- Application of 30 kg N and 20 kg P2O5ha-1 along with FYM @ 6 t ha-1e3
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 1.31e3
- Qualifier
- residual effecte3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e3“Application of 30 kg N and 20 kg P2O5ha-1 along with FYM @ 6 t ha-1 recorded higher yield (2.75 and 1.31 t ha-1) of pearlmillet and mustard, respectively as their residual effect”
Claim · model-written summary
In mustard, 60 kg N and 40 kg P2O5 ha-1 gave the highest yield (1.30 t ha-1).
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e4“in mustard application of 60 kg N and 40 kg P2O5 ha-1 resulted highest yield (1.30 t ha-1), PEY (6.66 t ha-1) and production efficiency (31.74 kg ha-1 day-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
In mustard, 60 kg N and 40 kg P2O5 ha-1 gave the highest pearl millet equivalent yield (6.66 t ha-1).
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e4“in mustard application of 60 kg N and 40 kg P2O5 ha-1 resulted highest yield (1.30 t ha-1), PEY (6.66 t ha-1) and production efficiency (31.74 kg ha-1 day-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
In mustard, 60 kg N and 40 kg P2O5 ha-1 gave the highest production efficiency (31.74 kg ha-1 day-1).
- Taxon
- mustarde4
- Treatment
- 60 kg N and 40 kg P2O5 ha-1e4
- Outcome
- production efficiencye4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- 31.74e4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e4“in mustard application of 60 kg N and 40 kg P2O5 ha-1 resulted highest yield (1.30 t ha-1), PEY (6.66 t ha-1) and production efficiency (31.74 kg ha-1 day-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Net returns were highest under ridge and furrow sowing with 30 kg N and 20 kg P2O5 ha-1 plus FYM (US $572.4 ha-1).
- Taxon
- PearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
- Treatment
- ridge and furrowe5
- Outcome
- Net returnse5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Value
- US $572.4e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)”
e5“Net returns and CSI were highest (US $572.4 & 21.92 and 603.4 & 20.02 ha-1) in ridge and furrow and preceding application of 30 kg N and 20 kg P2O5 ha-1along with FYM @ 6 t ha-1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbon sustainability index was highest under ridge and furrow sowing (21.92).
- Taxon
- PearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
- Treatment
- ridge and furrowe5
- Outcome
- CSIe5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Value
- 21.92e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)”
e5“Net returns and CSI were highest (US $572.4 & 21.92 and 603.4 & 20.02 ha-1) in ridge and furrow and preceding application of 30 kg N and 20 kg P2O5 ha-1along with FYM @ 6 t ha-1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
In mustard, the carbon sustainability index was highest in the control (21.84).
Verbatim
e6“In mustard CSI was highest in control (21.84) and net returns (US $ 571.7 ha-1) were highest with highest nutrient level”
Claim · model-written summary
In mustard, net returns were highest with the highest nutrient level (US $ 571.7 ha-1).
Verbatim
e6“In mustard CSI was highest in control (21.84) and net returns (US $ 571.7 ha-1) were highest with highest nutrient level”
Claim · model-written summary
Pearl millet and mustard can be grown under ridge-furrow sowing with integrated nutrient management to sustain soil health and farm profitability.
- Taxon
- pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse7
- Outcome
- sustaining soil health and higher farm profitabilitye7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“This study indicates that pearlmillet and mustard can be grown under ridge furrow sowing with INM for sustaining soil health and higher farm profitability”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
irrigation · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →nitrogen · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
146 papers more in this group
See all 150 papers →fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
255 papers more in this group
See all 259 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.