Abstract
Populations of Empoasca fabae (Harris) were compared on soybean varieties having different types and amounts of pubescence. The orientation of the hairs was more important in resistance to the leafhopper than the number of hairs. Glabrous strains of soybeans were damaged by leafhoppers more than other strains. Fewer pods were aborted, and the glabrous strains had a significant increase in yield, number of pods per node, pods per main stem, and weight per 100 seeds when the leafhoppers were controlled with an insecticide.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Hair orientation was more important than hair number for leafhopper resistance.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Organ / stage
- hairse0
- Outcome
- resistance to the leafhoppere0
- Direction
- more importante0
- Comparator
- number of hairse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The orientation of the hairs was more important in resistance to the leafhopper than the number of hairs”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Glabrous soybean strains suffered more leafhopper damage than other strains.
- Taxon
- soybeans
Glycine maxe0 - Material
- Glabrous strainse0
- Outcome
- damaged by leafhopperse0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- other strainse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Glabrous strains of soybeans were damaged by leafhoppers more than other strains”
Claim · model-written summary
Insecticide control of leafhoppers reduced pod abortion in glabrous soybean strains.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Material
- glabrous strainse0
- Treatment
- controlled with an insecticidee0
- Outcome
- pods were abortede0
- Direction
- Fewere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fewer pods were aborted, and the glabrous strains had a significant increase in yield, number of pods per node, pods per main stem, and weight per 100 seeds when the leafhoppers were controlled with an insecticide”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Insecticide control significantly increased yield in glabrous soybean strains.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Material
- glabrous strainse0
- Treatment
- controlled with an insecticidee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the glabrous strains had a significant increase in yield, number of pods per node, pods per main stem, and weight per 100 seeds when the leafhoppers were controlled with an insecticide”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Insecticide control significantly increased pods per node, pods per stem, and seed weight in glabrous strains.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Material
- glabrous strainse0
- Treatment
- controlled with an insecticidee0
- Outcome
- number of pods per node, pods per main stem, and weight per 100 seedse0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the glabrous strains had a significant increase in yield, number of pods per node, pods per main stem, and weight per 100 seeds when the leafhoppers were controlled with an insecticide”
t0“Soybean”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
64 papers more in this group
See all 68 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.