Paper · 2000 · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology

Effects of UV-C irradiation on lipid peroxidation markers during ripening of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum L.) fruits

Essaid Ait Barka; Siamak Kalantari; Joseph Makhlouf; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
45
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of a hormic dose (3.7 kJ m−2) of UV-C (254 nm) on changes in fruit membrane lipids perox-idation markers during storage were determined using tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum L. cv. Trust) fruit. There were two distinct response phases following the treatment. A significant induction of lipid peroxidation markers (lipofuscin-like compounds, malondialdehyde, aldehydes, pentane, ethane, hydrogen peroxide, and efflux of elec-trolytes including potassium and calcium) occurred within the first 5 days. This induction suggests that the cell mem-brane was the primary target of UV-C irradiation. After this period, the level of all of these peroxidation markers become lower in UV-C-treated fruit than in control fruit, suggesting the induction of a defense or repair mechanism, probably involving production of antioxidants and activation of antioxidative enzyme. Within the second phase, any changes in lipid peroxidation activity reflected the fruit ripening / senescence process rather than the UV-C effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C induced tomato fruit lipid peroxidation markers during the first five days.

Material
Truste2
Treatment
3.7 kJ m−2) of UV-C (254 nme1
Outcome
lipid peroxidation markerse0
Direction
inductione0
Qualifier
first 5 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant induction of lipid peroxidation markers (lipofuscin-like compounds, malondialdehyde, aldehydes, pentane, ethane, hydrogen peroxide, and efflux of elec-trolytes including potassium and calcium) occurred within the first 5 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–513 · show in text ↑
e1

“a hormic dose (3.7 kJ m−2) of UV-C (254 nm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–58 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum L. cv. Trust) fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After five days, UV-C-treated tomato fruit had lower peroxidation markers than controls.

Material
Truste1
Treatment
UV-C-treatede0
Outcome
peroxidation markerse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After this period, the level of all of these peroxidation markers become lower in UV-C-treated fruit than in control fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–728 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum L. cv. Trust) fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–206 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The early marker induction suggests tomato fruit membranes were the primary UV-C target.

Treatment
UV-C irradiatione0
Outcome
cell mem-brane was the primary targete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This induction suggests that the cell mem-brane was the primary target of UV-C irradiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–605 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum L. cv. Trust) fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–206 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The later fall in tomato peroxidation markers suggests antioxidant production or enzyme activation as repair.

Outcome
defense or repair mechanisme0
Qualifier
probably involving production of antioxidants and activation of antioxidative enzymee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting the induction of a defense or repair mechanism, probably involving production of antioxidants and activation of antioxidative enzyme.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–874 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum L. cv. Trust) fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–206 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second phase, peroxidation changes reflected tomato ripening or senescence.

Organ / stage
fruite1
Outcome
changes in lipid peroxidation activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Within the second phase, any changes in lipid peroxidation activity reflected the fruit ripening / senescence process rather than the UV-C effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1021 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum L. cv. Trust) fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–206 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.