Paper · 2013 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Evaluation of bispyribac-sodium in transplanted rice

R. Veeraputhiran; R. Balasubramanian

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Madurai to evaluate herbicide bispyribac-sodium in transplanted rice varieties ‘ASD 16’ and ‘ADT 37 during 2010 and 2011. Seven treatments were included in a randomized block design and replicated four times. The treatments consisted of pre–emergence application of butachlor 500 g/ha, post-emergence application of bispyribac-sodium 10 SC at 25, 35 and 50 g/ha, weed free, hand weeding twice and unweeded check. The results revealed that total weed population and dry weight under bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha were at par with the higher doses of bispyribac-sodium at 35 and 50 g/ha during both the years of study. The weed control efficiency and weed index under bispyribac-sodium at lower dose were also comparable with that of higher doses indicating the sufficiency of bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha for effective weed management in transplanted rice. The effect of bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha on producing tillers and panicles was also at par with that of higher doses and twice hand weeding and significantly superior than butachlor application. Post-emergence application of bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha recorded a grain yield of 6.84 and 6.51 t/ha during 2010 and 2011, respectively which were at par with higher doses of bispyribac-sodium, twice hand weeding and weed free and significantly higher than butachlor application. Higher net income and benefit-cost ratio were also associated with the application of bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total weed population and dry weight under bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha were at par with the higher doses.

Taxon
transplanted ricet0
Treatment
bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/hae1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
total weed population and dry weighte1
Direction
at pare1
Comparator
higher doses of bispyribac-sodium at 35 and 50 g/hae1

Verbatim

t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“total weed population and dry weight under bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha were at par with the higher doses of bispyribac-sodium at 35 and 50 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control efficiency and weed index under the lower dose were comparable with the higher doses.

Taxon
transplanted ricet0
Treatment
bispyribac-sodium at lower dosee2
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weed control efficiency and weed indexe2
Direction
comparablee2
Comparator
higher dosese2

Verbatim

t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–52 · show in text ↑
e2

“The weed control efficiency and weed index under bispyribac-sodium at lower dose were also comparable with that of higher doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha gave tiller and panicle production at par with higher doses and twice hand weeding.

Taxon
transplanted ricet0
Treatment
bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/hae3
Outcome
producing tillers and paniclese3
Direction
at pare3
Comparator
higher doses and twice hand weedinge3

Verbatim

t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–52 · show in text ↑
e3

“The effect of bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha on producing tillers and panicles was also at par with that of higher doses and twice hand weeding and significantly superior than butachlor application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha gave significantly superior tiller and panicle production than butachlor.

Taxon
transplanted ricet0
Treatment
bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/hae3
Outcome
producing tillers and paniclese3
Direction
significantly superiore3
Comparator
butachlor applicatione3

Verbatim

t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–52 · show in text ↑
e3

“The effect of bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha on producing tillers and panicles was also at par with that of higher doses and twice hand weeding and significantly superior than butachlor application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield under bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha was 6.84 and 6.51 t/ha in 2010 and 2011, at par with higher doses, twice hand weeding and weed free.

Taxon
transplanted ricet0
Treatment
bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/hae4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
at pare4
Value
6.84 and 6.51 t/hae4
Comparator
higher doses of bispyribac-sodium, twice hand weeding and weed freee4

Verbatim

t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–52 · show in text ↑
e4

“Post-emergence application of bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha recorded a grain yield of 6.84 and 6.51 t/ha during 2010 and 2011, respectively which were at par with higher doses of bispyribac-sodium, twice hand weeding and weed free and significantly higher than butachlor application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield under bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha was significantly higher than under butachlor.

Taxon
transplanted ricet0
Treatment
bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/hae4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
significantly highere4
Comparator
butachlor applicatione4

Verbatim

t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–52 · show in text ↑
e4

“Post-emergence application of bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha recorded a grain yield of 6.84 and 6.51 t/ha during 2010 and 2011, respectively which were at par with higher doses of bispyribac-sodium, twice hand weeding and weed free and significantly higher than butachlor application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1450 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher net income and benefit-cost ratio were associated with bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha.

Taxon
transplanted ricet0
Treatment
bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/hae5
Outcome
net income and benefit-cost ratioe5
Direction
Highere5

Verbatim

t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–52 · show in text ↑
e5

“Higher net income and benefit-cost ratio were also associated with the application of bispyribac-sodium at 25 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1566 · show in text ↑

bispyribac-sodium · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

170 papers: 161 positive, 9 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

166 papers more in this group

See all 170 papers →

bispyribac-sodium · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 149 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.