Paper · 1992 · Physiologia Plantarum

Effects of root hypoxia and a low P supply on relative growth, carbon dioxide exchange rates and carbon partitioning in Pinus serotina seedlings

Mary A. Topa; John M. Cheeseman

19
claims
44
verbatim quotes
36
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present study was conducted to determine how 10 weeks of root hypoxia and a low P supply altered relative growth, and carbon acquisition and partitioning in a moderately flood tolerant pine. Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings were grown in continuously flowing solution culture at 5 or 100 μ M P, under aerobic or hypoxic solution conditions. Staggered harvests were used to ascertain changes in biomass allocation and relative growth over time. Carbon dioxide exchange rates (CER) were determined by infrared gas analysis, and needles were analyzed for inorganic P (Pi), sucrose, reducing sugars and starch. Although aeration treatment had no significant effect on shoot dry weight or shoot ontogeny, root dry weight of hypoxic seedlings was significantly lower than that of aerobic seedliings after 8 weeks, regardless of the P treatment. Mean relative growth rates (RGR) of roots in the high P treatment initially decreased under hypoxia, but recovered by the sixth week with the production of adventitious roots. Two weeks of hypoxic growth conditions decreased CER and stomatal conductances of seedlings in the high P treatment by more than 30% relative to their aerobic counterparts. Stomatal closure was not accompanied by a decrease in intracellular CO 2 , but was accompanied by an increase in starch accumulation. Recoveries of CER, stomatal conductance and carbohydrate metabolism coincided with the recovery of root growth. Low P growth conditions did not significantly affect shoot or root dry weight until the sixth week of treatment. However, differences in seedling RGR, particularly needle RGR, were discernable during the first 2 weeks. Low P treatment effects on CER paralleled changes in needle RGR, with needle RGR more affected than CER. After 6 weeks, CER of aerobically grown seedlings in the low P treatment were only 15% lower than CER of seedlings in the high P treatment, despite a 31% and 75% reduction in needle RGR and Pi concentrations, respectively. Increased starch concentrations of recently expanded needles at this time were probably a result of diminished growth. The inhibitory effect of a low P supply on shoot growth, more specifically on needle expansion and emergence of new fascicular needles, probably limited net carbon fixed per plant more than any direct effect of low P on CER per se.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeration had no significant effect on shoot dry weight or shoot ontogeny.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae1
Treatment
aeration treatmente0
Outcome
shoot dry weight or shoot ontogenye0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aeration treatment had no significant effect on shoot dry weight or shoot ontogeny”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–714 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypoxia reduced root dry weight after eight weeks regardless of phosphorus treatment.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae1
Treatment
hypoxice0
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
after 8 weeks, regardless of the P treatmente0
Comparator
aerobic seedliingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root dry weight of hypoxic seedlings was significantly lower than that of aerobic seedliings after 8 weeks, regardless of the P treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–853 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high phosphorus, hypoxia initially decreased root relative growth rate.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae1
Treatment
hypoxiae0
Outcome
relative growth rates (RGR) of rootse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
high P treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean relative growth rates (RGR) of roots in the high P treatment initially decreased under hypoxia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–954 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root relative growth rate recovered by week six with adventitious root production.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae2
Organ / stage
adventitious rootse0
Outcome
relative growth rates (RGR) of rootse1
Direction
recoverede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recovered by the sixth week with the production of adventitious roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1029 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean relative growth rates (RGR) of roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–896 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two weeks of hypoxia reduced carbon dioxide exchange rate by over 30% under high phosphorus.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae1
Treatment
hypoxic growth conditionse0
Outcome
CERe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
more than 30%e0
Comparator
aerobic counterpartse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two weeks of hypoxic growth conditions decreased CER and stomatal conductances of seedlings in the high P treatment by more than 30% relative to their aerobic counterparts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1202 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two weeks of hypoxia reduced stomatal conductance by over 30% under high phosphorus.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae1
Treatment
hypoxic growth conditionse0
Outcome
stomatal conductancese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
more than 30%e0
Comparator
aerobic counterpartse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two weeks of hypoxic growth conditions decreased CER and stomatal conductances of seedlings in the high P treatment by more than 30% relative to their aerobic counterparts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1202 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal closure did not accompany a decrease in intracellular carbon dioxide.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae1
Outcome
intracellular CO 2e0
Direction
not accompanied by a decreasee0
Comparator
Stomatal closuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal closure was not accompanied by a decrease in intracellular CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1276 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal closure accompanied increased starch accumulation.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae1
Outcome
starch accumulatione0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Stomatal closuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal closure was not accompanied by a decrease in intracellular CO 2 , but was accompanied by an increase in starch accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1336 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovery of carbon exchange, stomatal conductance and carbohydrate metabolism coincided with root growth recovery.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae1
Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
Recoveries of CER, stomatal conductance and carbohydrate metabolisme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Recoveries of CER, stomatal conductance and carbohydrate metabolism coincided with the recovery of root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1448 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low phosphorus did not significantly affect shoot or root dry weight until week six.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae1
Treatment
Low P growth conditionse0
Outcome
shoot or root dry weighte0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low P growth conditions did not significantly affect shoot or root dry weight until the sixth week of treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1561 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling and especially needle relative growth rates differed during the first two weeks under low phosphorus.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae2
Treatment
Low Pe1
Outcome
seedling RGR, particularly needle RGRe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences in seedling RGR, particularly needle RGR, were discernable during the first 2 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1667 · show in text ↑
e1

“Low P treatment effects on CER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1699 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low phosphorus effects on carbon exchange paralleled changes in needle relative growth.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae1
Organ / stage
needlee0
Treatment
Low Pe0
Outcome
CERe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low P treatment effects on CER paralleled changes in needle RGR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1732 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Needle relative growth was more affected than carbon exchange under low phosphorus.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae2
Treatment
Low Pe1
Outcome
needle RGRe0
Comparator
CERe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“needle RGR more affected than CER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1739–1772 · show in text ↑
e1

“Low P treatment effects on CER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1699 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After six weeks, low phosphorus reduced carbon exchange rate by 15% in aerobic seedlings.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae1
Treatment
low P treatmente0
Outcome
CERe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
15%e0
Comparator
high P treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CER of aerobically grown seedlings in the low P treatment were only 15% lower than CER of seedlings in the high P treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1912 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After six weeks, low phosphorus reduced needle relative growth by 31%.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae2
Treatment
low P treatmente1
Outcome
needle RGRe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“31% and 75% reduction in needle RGR and Pi concentrations, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1924–1995 · show in text ↑
e1

“low P treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1831–1846 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After six weeks, low phosphorus reduced needle inorganic phosphorus by 75%.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae2
Treatment
low P treatmente1
Outcome
Pi concentrationse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“31% and 75% reduction in needle RGR and Pi concentrations, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1924–1995 · show in text ↑
e1

“low P treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1831–1846 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recently expanded needles had increased starch concentrations, probably from diminished growth.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae1
Organ / stage
recently expanded needlese0
Outcome
Increased starch concentrationse0
Qualifier
diminished growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased starch concentrations of recently expanded needles at this time were probably a result of diminished growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1997–2114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low phosphorus inhibited shoot growth, especially needle expansion and emergence of new fascicular needles.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae1
Organ / stage
new fascicular needlese0
Treatment
low P supplye0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
inhibitorye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inhibitory effect of a low P supply on shoot growth, more specifically on needle expansion and emergence of new fascicular needles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2120–2250 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer inhibited growth limited net carbon fixed per plant more than direct effects on carbon exchange.

Taxon
Pond pinePinus serotinae2
Treatment
low P supplye1
Outcome
net carbon fixed per plante0
Qualifier
shoot growthe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus serotina
Pinus serotina · Taxonautrpy · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“probably limited net carbon fixed per plant more than any direct effect of low P on CER per se”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2252–2346 · show in text ↑
e1

“inhibitory effect of a low P supply on shoot growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2120–2171 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pond pine ( Pinus serotina Michx.) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–239 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · growth · Pinus serotina (pond pine)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

flooding · growth · Pinus serotina (pond pine)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.