Paper · 2002 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Response of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to residual soil N following cotton (Gossypium spp.) in rotation in the San Joaquin Valley of California

E. S. BASSIL; S. R. KAFFKA; R. A. HUTMACHER

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Deep-rooted crops used in rotation can improve the overall water and N use efficiencies of cropping systems and help minimize nitrate leaching to groundwater. Safflower ( Carthamus tinctorius L.) is a deep-rooted annual crop grown in Mediterranean regions that might be useful for this purpose. Safflower's response to residual soil N measured to 2.7 m in the soil profile was evaluated in 1998 in field plots in the San Joaquin Valley, California, USA that were used previously for cotton over a 9-year period and had been fertilized with nine N rates from 0 to 230 kg N/ha. Residual soil NO 3 -N measured prior to safflower planting increased with prior cotton fertilization rates. Amounts present to a soil profile depth of 2.7 m varied from 760 to 2600 kg/ha. Safflower seed yield increased with increasing pre-plant residual NO 3 -N levels, from 1700 kg/ha in the control to 2200 kg/ha, and then declined to 1800 kg/ha at the largest residual N level. Oil per cent, and oil yield were affected by soil N only at the largest residual N level, while oil composition was not affected. Root growth and N uptake at depth increased in plots with larger amounts of residual N compared to those with less. Results suggest that N fertilization applied to safflower could be reduced or even eliminated following crops previously fertilized at economic levels. Residual N should be accounted in growers' management programmes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil NO 3 -N before safflower planting increased with prior cotton fertilization rates.

Treatment
prior cotton fertilization ratese1
Outcome
residual soil NO 3 -Ne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
760 to 2600 kg/hae2
Setting
San Joaquin Valley, California, USAe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to residual soil N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“Residual soil NO 3 -N measured prior to safflower planting increased with prior cotton fertilization rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–682 · show in text ↑
e2

“Amounts present to a soil profile depth of 2.7 m varied from 760 to 2600 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–762 · show in text ↑
e3

“field plots in the San Joaquin Valley, California, USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Safflower seed yield increased with increasing pre-plant residual NO 3 -N, reaching 2200 kg/ha compared with 1700 kg/ha in the control.

Treatment
pre-plant residual NO 3 -N levelse4
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Value
2200 kg/hae4
Qualifier
1700 kg/hae4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to residual soil N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e4

“Safflower seed yield increased with increasing pre-plant residual NO 3 -N levels, from 1700 kg/ha in the control to 2200 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Safflower seed yield declined to 1800 kg/ha at the largest residual N level.

Treatment
largest residual N levele5
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
declinede5
Value
1800 kg/hae5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to residual soil N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e4

“Safflower seed yield increased with increasing pre-plant residual NO 3 -N levels, from 1700 kg/ha in the control to 2200 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–890 · show in text ↑
e5

“and then declined to 1800 kg/ha at the largest residual N level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil percent and oil yield of safflower were affected by soil N only at the largest residual N level.

Treatment
largest residual N levele6
Outcome
Oil per cent, and oil yielde6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to residual soil N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e6

“Oil per cent, and oil yield were affected by soil N only at the largest residual N level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil composition of safflower was not affected by residual soil N.

Treatment
residual soil Nt0
Outcome
oil compositione7
Direction
not affectede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to residual soil N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e7

“while oil composition was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1085 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results differ

41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.