Paper · 2000 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Response of summer‐planted potatoes to level of applied nitrogen and water

M. A. Hegney; I. R. McPharlin

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware) were determined using sprinklers in a line‐source design on a Spearwood sand. Irrigation water was applied at 73 to 244% of the daily pan evaporation (Epan) and N at 0 to 800 kg N ha‐1 (total applied) as NH4NO3 in 10 applications post‐planting. There was a significant yield (total and marketable) response to irrigation, at all levels of applied N, and N at all levels of applied water (P<0.001). The interaction between irrigation and N was also significant (P<0.001). There was no significant yield response to irrigation from 149% Epan (i.e., W3 treatment) to 244% Epan (i.e., W6 treatment). Irrigation at 125 and 150% of Epan was required for 95 and 99% of maximum yield, respectively, as determined from fitted Mitscherlich relationships. Critical levels of N required for 95 (417 kg ha‐1) and 99% (703 kg ha‐1) of maximum yield were also determined from a Mitschlerlich relationship fitted to the average of the W3 to W6 treatments. The percent total N and nitrate‐N in petioles of youngest fully expanded leaves required for 95 and 99% of maximum yield was 1.78 and 2.11, respectively, at the 10 mm tuber stage, and 0.25 and 0.80% at the 10mm plus 14 day stage (from quadratic regressions). There was a significant (P≤0.001) increase in N uptake by tubers with level of applied N from 57 kg ha‐1 at 0 kg applied N ha‐1 to 190 kg ha‐1 at 800 kg applied N ha‐1 (from a Mitscherlich relationship fitted to the average of W3 to W6 treatments). After accounting for N uptake from soil reserves (57 kg N ha‐1), apparent recovery efficiency (RE) of fertilizer N by tubers [RE=(Up‐Uo/Np) where Up=uptake of N by the crop, Uo=uptake in absence of applied N and Np is the level of applied N, expressed as a fraction] declined from 0.28 at 100 kg applied N ha‐1 to 0.17 at 800 kg applied N ha‐1. There was a linear increase in ‘after cooking darkening’ (i.e., greying) of tubers with increasing level of applied N. Conversely, ‘sloughing’ (i.e., disintegration) of tubers decreased (inverse polynomial) with increasing level of applied N. Rate of irrigation had no effect on these cooking qualities. Reducing applied irrigation and N from levels required for 99% of maximum yield to levels required for 95% of maximum yield would not lead to a significant reduction in profit. This would increase apparent recovery efficiency of applied N by plants, maintain tuber quality, and reduce the impact of potato production on the water systems of the Swan coastal plain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly increased total and marketable potato yield at all levels of applied N.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Material
cv. Delawaree0
Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
yield (total and marketable)e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a significant yield (total and marketable) response to irrigation, at all levels of applied N, and N at all levels of applied water (P<0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied N significantly affected total and marketable potato yield at all levels of applied water.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Material
cv. Delawaree0
Treatment
applied Ne1
Outcome
yield (total and marketable)e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a significant yield (total and marketable) response to irrigation, at all levels of applied N, and N at all levels of applied water (P<0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–477 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between irrigation and N significantly affected potato yield.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
irrigation and Ne3
Outcome
interaction between irrigation and Ne3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“The interaction between irrigation and N was also significant (P<0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no significant yield response to irrigation between 149% and 244% of Epan.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
244% Epan (i.e., W6 treatment)e2
Outcome
yield responsee2
Direction
no significante2
Comparator
149% Epan (i.e., W3 treatment)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“There was no significant yield response to irrigation from 149% Epan (i.e., W3 treatment) to 244% Epan (i.e., W6 treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–675 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 125 and 150% of Epan was required for 95 and 99% of maximum potato yield, as determined from fitted Mitscherlich relationships.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
Irrigation at 125 and 150% of Epane4
Outcome
maximum yielde4
Value
95 and 99%e4
Qualifier
fitted Mitscherlich relationshipse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80 · show in text ↑
e4

“Irrigation at 125 and 150% of Epan was required for 95 and 99% of maximum yield, respectively, as determined from fitted Mitscherlich relationships”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–824 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical N level for 95% of maximum potato yield is 417 kg ha-1.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Outcome
Critical levels of Ne5
Value
417 kg ha‐1e5
Qualifier
95 (417 kg ha‐1)e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“Critical levels of N required for 95 (417 kg ha‐1) and 99% (703 kg ha‐1) of maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–915 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical N level for 99% of maximum potato yield is 703 kg ha-1.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Outcome
Critical levels of Ne5
Value
703 kg ha‐1e5
Qualifier
99% (703 kg ha‐1) of maximum yielde5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“Critical levels of N required for 95 (417 kg ha‐1) and 99% (703 kg ha‐1) of maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–915 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total N and nitrate-N in petioles of youngest fully expanded leaves at the 10 mm tuber stage were 1.78 and 2.11 at 95 and 99% of maximum yield.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Organ / stage
petioles of youngest fully expanded leavese6
Outcome
percent total N and nitrate‐Ne6
Value
1.78 and 2.11e6
Qualifier
at the 10 mm tuber stagee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80 · show in text ↑
e6

“The percent total N and nitrate‐N in petioles of youngest fully expanded leaves required for 95 and 99% of maximum yield was 1.78 and 2.11, respectively, at the 10 mm tuber stage, and 0.25 and 0.80% at the 10mm plus 14 day stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1249 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total N and nitrate-N in petioles of youngest fully expanded leaves at the 10mm plus 14 day stage were 0.25 and 0.80% at 95 and 99% of maximum yield.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Organ / stage
petioles of youngest fully expanded leavese6
Outcome
percent total N and nitrate‐Ne6
Value
0.25 and 0.80%e6
Qualifier
at the 10mm plus 14 day stagee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80 · show in text ↑
e6

“The percent total N and nitrate‐N in petioles of youngest fully expanded leaves required for 95 and 99% of maximum yield was 1.78 and 2.11, respectively, at the 10 mm tuber stage, and 0.25 and 0.80% at the 10mm plus 14 day stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake by tubers increased with applied N, from 57 kg ha-1 at 0 kg applied N to 190 kg ha-1 at 800 kg applied N.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
level of applied Ne7
Outcome
N uptake by tuberse7
Direction
increasee7
Value
190 kg ha‐1e7
Comparator
0 kg applied N ha‐1e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80 · show in text ↑
e7

“There was a significant (P≤0.001) increase in N uptake by tubers with level of applied N from 57 kg ha‐1 at 0 kg applied N ha‐1 to 190 kg ha‐1 at 800 kg applied N ha‐1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1447 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent recovery efficiency of fertilizer N by tubers declined from 0.28 at 100 kg applied N to 0.17 at 800 kg applied N.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
applied Ne2
Outcome
apparent recovery efficiency (RE) of fertilizer Ne1
Direction
declinede2
Value
0.28 at 100 kg applied N ha‐1 to 0.17 at 800 kg applied N ha‐1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“apparent recovery efficiency (RE) of fertilizer N by tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1653 · show in text ↑
e2

“declined from 0.28 at 100 kg applied N ha‐1 to 0.17 at 800 kg applied N ha‐1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–1872 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cooking darkening (greying) of tubers increased linearly with increasing applied N.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
increasing level of applied Ne1
Outcome
‘after cooking darkening’ (i.e., greying) of tuberse1
Direction
increasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a linear increase in ‘after cooking darkening’ (i.e., greying) of tubers with increasing level of applied N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1874–1991 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sloughing (disintegration) of tubers decreased with increasing applied N.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
increasing level of applied Ne1
Outcome
‘sloughing’ (i.e., disintegration) of tuberse1
Direction
decreasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘sloughing’ (i.e., disintegration) of tubers decreased (inverse polynomial) with increasing level of applied N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2005–2115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rate of irrigation had no effect on cooking qualities of potato tubers.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
Rate of irrigatione1
Outcome
cooking qualitiese1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rate of irrigation had no effect on these cooking qualities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2117–2176 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing irrigation and N from the levels required for 99% to those required for 95% of maximum yield would not significantly reduce potato profit.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
Reducing applied irrigation and Ne1
Outcome
profite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation and nitrogen (N) requirements of potatoes (cv. Delaware)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Reducing applied irrigation and N from levels required for 99% of maximum yield to levels required for 95% of maximum yield would not lead to a significant reduction in profit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2178–2353 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Using the 95% levels would increase apparent recovery efficiency of applied N by potato plants, maintain tuber quality and reduce water-system impact in the Swan coastal plain.

Outcome
apparent recovery efficiency of applied N by plantse1
Setting
Swan coastal plaine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This would increase apparent recovery efficiency of applied N by plants, maintain tuber quality, and reduce the impact of potato production on the water systems of the Swan coastal plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2355–2541 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.