Paper · 2005 · Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Photosynthesis of birch (Betula pendula) is sensitive to springtime frost and ozone

Elina Oksanen; Vera Freiwald; Nadezhda Prozherina; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Impacts of springtime frost and ozone enrichment, alone and in combination, on six birch (Betula pendula Roth) genotypes regenerated from a naturally occurring birch stand in southeastern Finland were studied. The seedlings were exposed to 65 ppb ozone (AOT40 (accumulated over a threshold of 40 ppb) exposure of 10.7 ppm·h) over 62 d in climate chambers, simulating spring conditions, and to –2 °C over two consecutive nights 33 d after the start of the experiment. The plants were measured for net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and concentrations of photosynthetic pigments, Rubisco, soluble proteins, carbohydrates, and macronutrients. Frost treatment caused a rapid 60%–77% decline in net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance rates. Recovery of net photosynthesis from frost was not complete during the subsequent 14 d, mainly because of impaired light capture through significant pigment loss and structural injuries. Concomitant ozone enrichment exacerbated the negative effect of frost on pigments and stomatal conductance. Both frost and ozone caused nutrient imbalance and increase in soluble proteins in leaves, whereas metabolism of carbohydrates was disturbed only when ozone was present. Responses to ozone and frost varied greatly among the genotypes, suggesting that there is a high capacity within the birch population to adapt to climate change through "preadapted" individuals.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frost reduced birch net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance by 60% to 77%.

Taxon
Betula pendulaBetula pendulat0
Treatment
Frost treatmente0
Outcome
net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance ratese0
Direction
declinee0
Value
60%–77%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Frost treatment caused a rapid 60%–77% decline in net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“birch (Betula pendula)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Birch net photosynthesis did not fully recover during the following 14 days after frost.

Taxon
Betula pendulaBetula pendulat0
Treatment
froste0
Outcome
Recovery of net photosynthesise0
Direction
not completee0
Value
14 de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Recovery of net photosynthesis from frost was not complete during the subsequent 14 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula pendula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–39 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The incomplete recovery was attributed mainly to pigment loss and structural injuries impairing light capture.

Taxon
Betula pendulaBetula pendulat0
Outcome
impaired light capturee0
Qualifier
significant pigment loss and structural injuriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mainly because of impaired light capture through significant pigment loss and structural injuries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula pendula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone enrichment worsened frost damage to birch pigments and stomatal conductance.

Taxon
Betula pendulaBetula pendulat0
Treatment
Concomitant ozone enrichmente0
Outcome
pigments and stomatal conductancee0
Direction
exacerbatede0
Comparator
froste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concomitant ozone enrichment exacerbated the negative effect of frost on pigments and stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula pendula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both frost and ozone caused nutrient imbalance and increased soluble leaf proteins.

Taxon
Betula pendulaBetula pendulat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Both frost and ozonee0
Outcome
nutrient imbalance and increase in soluble proteinse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both frost and ozone caused nutrient imbalance and increase in soluble proteins in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula pendula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbohydrate metabolism was disturbed only with ozone exposure.

Taxon
Betula pendulaBetula pendulat0
Treatment
ozonee0
Outcome
metabolism of carbohydratese0
Direction
disturbede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“metabolism of carbohydrates was disturbed only when ozone was present”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula pendula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Birch genotypes varied greatly in responses to ozone and frost.

Taxon
Betula pendulaBetula pendulat0
Material
genotypese0
Outcome
Responses to ozone and froste0
Direction
varied greatlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Responses to ozone and frost varied greatly among the genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“Betula pendula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–39 · show in text ↑

ozone · physiology: gas exchange · Betula pendula (white birch)Results differ

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

ozone · quality: sugar starch · Betula pendula (white birch)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.