Paper · 2006 · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE

Preliminary results of a UV-B effect incorporated GOSSYM model

Xinli Wang; Wei Gao; K. Raja Reddy; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments and laboratory tests have shown multiple effects of enhanced ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation on cotton growth, development, and yield. Adverse effects include development of chlorotic and necrotic patches on leaves, reductions in total leaf area, plant height, photosynthesis, and yield. However, little work has been carried out to incorporate these experimental results into a simulation model and to estimate the effects of UV-B radiation under field conditions with varied environments and management practices. This study incorporates experimental results of UV-B effects on cotton crop into a cotton simulation model, GOSSYM, which is being used widely in various applications. In this work, first modules were modified to incorporate the effects of UV-B radiation on canopy photosynthesis, leaf area expansion, and stem and branch elongation. Then, the modified model was used to test the validity of model assumptions and algorithms on independent experimental data sets. Finally, preliminary studies were performed to simulate the effects of UV-B radiation in the field conditions at Stoneville, Mississippi using 30-year (1964-1993) climate data. Simulation results agreed well with experimental measurements, proving the validation of the model. Our results suggest that cotton lint yield declined with increased UV-B radiation. The reductions were 20% when UV-B irradiance was 12 kJ m-2 under irrigated conditions. Similar reductions in yield were predicted at lower UV-B radiation (11 kJ m-2) under rain-fed conditions. The modified model will be useful to simulate the impacts of UV-B radiation on cotton growth and yield under current and future climatic conditions and to suggest management options to mitigate the adverse effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The modified GOSSYM model agreed well with independent experimental measurements.

Outcome
Simulation results agreed well with experimental measurementse0
Comparator
experimental measurementse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Simulation results agreed well with experimental measurements, proving the validation of the model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1272 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“GOSSYM model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated cotton lint yield declined as UV-B increased.

Treatment
UV-B radiatione0
Outcome
cotton lint yielde0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results suggest that cotton lint yield declined with increased UV-B radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

At 12 kJ m-2 UV-B, irrigated cotton lint yield fell 20%.

Treatment
UV-B irradiance was 12 kJ m-2e0
Outcome
cotton lint yielde1
Direction
reductionse0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
under irrigated conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reductions were 20% when UV-B irradiance was 12 kJ m-2 under irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1442 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton lint yield declined with increased UV-B radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A similar yield reduction was predicted for rain-fed cotton at 11 kJ m-2 UV-B.

Treatment
UV-B radiation (11 kJ m-2)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Qualifier
under rain-fed conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar reductions in yield were predicted at lower UV-B radiation (11 kJ m-2) under rain-fed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1548 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton lint yield declined with increased UV-B radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1355 · show in text ↑

radiation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

uv · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 1 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

uv · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

light · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.