Paper · 1999 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effects of plant density and mulching on the performance of late-season tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) in southern Nigeria

S. O. AGELE; G. O. IREMIREN; S. O. OJENIYI

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
26
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The growth and yield of late-season tomato was studied at Akure, Nigeria, from 1995 to 1998. In each year, treatments were 0 (bare ground) or 12 kg/ha grass mulch applied to tomatoes at densities of 1·9, 2·8, 3·7 and 5·6 plants/m 2 in a factorial combination. Increase in plant density and mulching reduced soil temperature at 5 cm depth while only the latter enhanced soil moisture at 10 cm depth throughout tomato growth. The improved soil hydrothermal regime resulted in earlier onset of flowering, 50% flowering date and date of first harvest respectively and shorter fruit harvest duration in tomato grown on either bare ground or at increased plant density. Although increased plant density reduced shoot dry weight per plant at final harvest, both root length per plant and root dry weight per plant were enhanced. Fruit yield/ha increased as plant density increased although yield of the individual plants and their components were significantly reduced. Because of compensation at higher plant population densities, it is economical to grow late-season tomato at 5·6 plants/m 2 . Mulching enhanced growth and yield of tomato compared to bare ground and the result emphasizes the need for early and rapid growth of late-season tomato before the onset of terminal drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased plant density reduced soil temperature at 5 cm depth in tomato.

Treatment
Increase in plant densitye1
Outcome
soil temperature at 5 cm depthe1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increase in plant density and mulching reduced soil temperature at 5 cm depth while only the latter enhanced soil moisture at 10 cm depth throughout tomato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching enhanced soil moisture at 10 cm depth in tomato.

Treatment
mulchinge1
Outcome
soil moisture at 10 cm depthe1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increase in plant density and mulching reduced soil temperature at 5 cm depth while only the latter enhanced soil moisture at 10 cm depth throughout tomato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased plant density led to earlier onset of flowering in tomato compared with bare ground.

Treatment
increased plant densitye2
Outcome
onset of floweringe2
Direction
earliere2
Comparator
bare grounde2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–104 · show in text ↑
e2

“The improved soil hydrothermal regime resulted in earlier onset of flowering, 50% flowering date and date of first harvest respectively and shorter fruit harvest duration in tomato grown on either bare ground or at increased plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased plant density reduced shoot dry weight per tomato plant at final harvest.

Treatment
increased plant densitye3
Outcome
shoot dry weight per plante3
Direction
reducede3
Qualifier
at final harveste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–104 · show in text ↑
e3

“Although increased plant density reduced shoot dry weight per plant at final harvest, both root length per plant and root dry weight per plant were enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased plant density enhanced root length per plant and root dry weight per plant in tomato.

Treatment
increased plant densitye3
Outcome
root length per plant and root dry weight per plante3
Direction
enhancede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–104 · show in text ↑
e3

“Although increased plant density reduced shoot dry weight per plant at final harvest, both root length per plant and root dry weight per plant were enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield per hectare of tomato increased as plant density increased.

Treatment
plant densitye4
Outcome
Fruit yield/hae4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–104 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fruit yield/ha increased as plant density increased although yield of the individual plants and their components were significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–961 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of individual tomato plants and their components were significantly reduced as plant density increased.

Treatment
plant densitye4
Outcome
yield of the individual plants and their componentse4
Direction
significantly reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–104 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fruit yield/ha increased as plant density increased although yield of the individual plants and their components were significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–961 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Growing late-season tomato at 5.6 plants/m2 is economical because of compensation at higher densities (authors recommendation).

Outcome
grow late-season tomato at 5·6 plants/m 2e5
Value
5·6 plants/m 2e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–104 · show in text ↑
e5

“it is economical to grow late-season tomato at 5·6 plants/m 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching enhanced growth and yield of tomato compared with bare ground.

Treatment
Mulchinge6
Outcome
growth and yielde6
Direction
enhancede6
Comparator
bare grounde6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–104 · show in text ↑
e6

“Mulching enhanced growth and yield of tomato compared to bare ground”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1157 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

density · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 48 positive, 12 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

mulching · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 184 positive, 26 negative or no effect

183 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

density · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.