Paper · 2010 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

IS CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE TECHNIQUE A USEFUL TOOL TO ASSESS MANGANESE DEFICIENCY AND TOXICITY STRESS IN OLIVE PLANTS?

T. A. Chatzistathis; I. E. Papadakis; I. N. Therios; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A 130-day hydroponic experiment was carried out in a glasshouse to examine whether manganese (Mn) concentration in the nutrient solution affects the nutritional status of olive plants and to find out whether the chlorophyll fluorescence technique is suitable to assess Mn toxicity and/or deficiency stress in olive plants prior to the appearance of these two nutritional disorders. For this purpose, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratios) were recorded every 40 days in the leaves of 'Kothreiki' and 'FS-17' olive cultivars, which were irrigated with Hoagland's nutrient solutions containing various Mn concentrations. In parallel the elongation of the main shoot of all experimental plants, as well as the concentrations of Mn, iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), boron (B), phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and potassium (K) in their leaves were recorded. The following Mn treatments were applied: 0 μM Mn (to induce Mn deficiency), 40 μM Mn (to promote normal growth), and 640 μM Mn (to induce Mn toxicity). Our results indicated that not only the rate of shoot elongation but also the fluctuation with time of the leaf concentrations of all determined mineral elements (except for Mn) was not significantly affected by the Mn concentration in the nutrient solution, irrespectively of the cultivar. This was not observed with regard to the time variation of the Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratios, where the values of these parameters were significantly reduced in the 640 μM Mn treatment at the 80th and 130th day of the experiment in both olive cultivars, compared to the relevant previous ones (those of the days 0 and 40th), something which did not happen in the other two Mn treatments (0 and 40 μM). However, in none of the two cultivars tested and in any of the three Mn treatments (0, 40 and 640μM) the Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratios did not drop below the critical values of 0.8 and 4, respectively, even at the end of the experiment, where high Mn concentrations were found in the leaves of both cultivars treated with 640 μM Mn (616 μg g−1 d.w. in 'FS-17' and 734 μg g−1 d.w. in 'Kothreiki'). Symptoms of Mn toxicity (curling and brown speckles) were observed in the top leaves of both cultivars, after the 90th day of the experiment. At the same time, the final leaf Mn concentrations (those of the 130th day of the experiment) in plants grown under 0 μM Mn were 23 μg g−1 d.w. in 'FS-17' and 20 μg g−1 d.w. in 'Kothreiki', i.e., a little above of the deficiency range (<20 μg g−1 d.w.). At the 130th day, Mn concentration in nutrient solution, as well as Mn concentration in the leaves of both olive cultivars was negatively correlated with the leaf concentration of Fe and the values of the Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratios, and positively with the concentrations of Zn and P in the leaves. Finally, the periodical measurement of the Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratios was proved to be a non-reliable means to predict the appearance of the visible symptoms of Mn toxicity in olive leaves (although their values declined significantly at the 80th and 130th day of the experiment in both olive cultivars). Keywords: chlorophyll fluorescencemanganesephotosystem IIolive cultivarsdeficiencytoxicity ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank Mrs. Sofia Kouti and Mrs. Vasiliki Tsakiridou for their assistance in chemical analyses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese treatment did not significantly affect shoot elongation rate.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
Mn concentration in the nutrient solutione0
Outcome
rate of shoot elongatione0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of shoot elongation but also the fluctuation with time of the leaf concentrations of all determined mineral elements (except for Mn) was not significantly affected by the Mn concentration in the nutrient solution, irrespectively of the cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1330 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Kothreiki' and 'FS-17' olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese treatment did not significantly affect temporal variation of leaf minerals other than Mn.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
Mn concentration in the nutrient solutione0
Outcome
fluctuation with time of the leaf concentrations of all determined mineral elements (except for Mn)e0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fluctuation with time of the leaf concentrations of all determined mineral elements (except for Mn) was not significantly affected by the Mn concentration in the nutrient solution, irrespectively of the cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1330 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Kothreiki' and 'FS-17' olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 640 μM Mn, Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 fell at days 80 and 130 versus earlier days in both cultivars.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
640 μM Mn treatmente0
Outcome
Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratiose0
Direction
significantly reducede0
Comparator
days 0 and 40the0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratios, where the values of these parameters were significantly reduced in the 640 μM Mn treatment at the 80th and 130th day of the experiment in both olive cultivars, compared to the relevant previous ones (those of the days 0 and 40th)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1648 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0 and 40 μM Mn, the fluorescence ratio decline seen at 640 μM did not occur.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae2
Treatment
0 and 40 μMe0
Outcome
Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratiose1
Direction
did not happene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“something which did not happen in the other two Mn treatments (0 and 40 μM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1725 · show in text ↑
e1

“time variation of the Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1417 · show in text ↑
e2

“'Kothreiki' and 'FS-17' olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–554 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither cultivar crossed the critical Fv/Fm or Fv/F0 thresholds in any treatment.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Outcome
Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratios did not drop below the critical values of 0.8 and 4e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in none of the two cultivars tested and in any of the three Mn treatments (0, 40 and 640μM) the Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratios did not drop below the critical values of 0.8 and 4, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1920 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Kothreiki' and 'FS-17' olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–554 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 640 μM Mn, FS-17 leaf Mn reached 616 μg g−1 dry weight.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Material
FS-17e0
Outcome
Mn concentrationse2
Value
616 μg g−1 d.w.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“616 μg g−1 d.w. in 'FS-17'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2053–2079 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Kothreiki' and 'FS-17' olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–554 · show in text ↑
e2

“high Mn concentrations were found in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1963–2010 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 640 μM Mn, Kothreiki leaf Mn reached 734 μg g−1 dry weight.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Material
Kothreikie0
Outcome
Mn concentrationse2
Value
734 μg g−1 d.w.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“734 μg g−1 d.w. in 'Kothreiki'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2084–2114 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Kothreiki' and 'FS-17' olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–554 · show in text ↑
e2

“high Mn concentrations were found in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1963–2010 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both cultivars developed toxicity symptoms in top leaves after day 90.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Organ / stage
top leavese0
Outcome
Symptoms of Mn toxicity (curling and brown speckles)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Symptoms of Mn toxicity (curling and brown speckles) were observed in the top leaves of both cultivars, after the 90th day of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2117–2257 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Kothreiki' and 'FS-17' olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–554 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 0 μM Mn, FS-17 leaf Mn was 23 μg g−1 dry weight on day 130.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Material
FS-17e0
Outcome
leaf Mn concentrationse2
Value
23 μg g−1 d.w.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“23 μg g−1 d.w. in 'FS-17'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2388–2413 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Kothreiki' and 'FS-17' olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–554 · show in text ↑
e2

“final leaf Mn concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2281–2309 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 0 μM Mn, Kothreiki leaf Mn was 20 μg g−1 dry weight on day 130.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Material
Kothreikie0
Outcome
leaf Mn concentrationse2
Value
20 μg g−1 d.w.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“20 μg g−1 d.w. in 'Kothreiki'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2418–2447 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Kothreiki' and 'FS-17' olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–554 · show in text ↑
e2

“final leaf Mn concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2281–2309 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solution and leaf Mn were negatively correlated with leaf Fe at day 130.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Compound
Mne0
Outcome
leaf concentration of Fee0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mn concentration in nutrient solution, as well as Mn concentration in the leaves of both olive cultivars was negatively correlated with the leaf concentration of Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2531–2695 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solution and leaf Mn were negatively correlated with fluorescence ratios at day 130.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Compound
Mne0
Outcome
values of the Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratiose0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mn concentration in nutrient solution, as well as Mn concentration in the leaves of both olive cultivars was negatively correlated with the leaf concentration of Fe and the values of the Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2531–2740 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solution and leaf Mn were positively correlated with leaf Zn and P.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Compound
Mne0
Outcome
concentrations of Zn and P in the leavese0
Direction
positivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mn concentration in nutrient solution, as well as Mn concentration in the leaves of both olive cultivars was negatively correlated with the leaf concentration of Fe and the values of the Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratios, and positively with the concentrations of Zn and P in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2531–2806 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Periodic fluorescence ratio measurement was unreliable for predicting visible Mn toxicity symptoms.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Outcome
non-reliable means to predict the appearance of the visible symptoms of Mn toxicitye0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the periodical measurement of the Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratios was proved to be a non-reliable means to predict the appearance of the visible symptoms of Mn toxicity in olive leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2817–2992 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

manganese atom · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

manganese atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 28 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fertilization · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.