Paper · 2009 · Witthayasan Kasetsat Witthayasat

Influence of trap crop on yield and cotton leafhopper population and its oviposition preference on leaves of different cotton varieties/lines.

Praparat Hormchan; Arunee Wongpiyasatid; W. Prajimpun

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experiment was set up as a split plot design, with four replications. White and naturally colored cotton of 4 varieties/lines, each was cultivated in monoculture, and with perimeter trap cropping and row intercropping with okra and castor bean at Thong Pha Phom, Kanchanaburi and with okra , and sunflower and castor bean at Nakhon Ratchasima Field Crop Research Center during the dry and late rainy seasons of the year 2008 respectively. The populations of leafhopper (Amrasca biguttula Ishida) were recorded from top and bottom leaves 30, 60 and 75 DAP (days after planting) and expressed as an average number / 2 leaves. The plots with trap crops were found to decrease in a number of leafhopper while yields increased comparing to the sole cotton in every variety/line. Choice test on oviposition preference was undertaken in the nylon cages holding 10 plants of each cotton variety/line exposed together to 20 leafhopper females for 2 weeks. The results from 20 leaves of each showed more egg numbers in the lateral vein than in the mid vein with no significant differences among test varieties/lines.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap crops reduced cotton leafhopper numbers relative to sole cotton across varieties and lines.

Treatment
trap cropse0
Interactor
leafhoppere0pest
Outcome
number of leafhoppere0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
sole cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plots with trap crops were found to decrease in a number of leafhopper while yields increased comparing to the sole cotton in every variety/line”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton leafhopper population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap crops increased cotton yields relative to sole cotton across varieties and lines.

Treatment
trap cropse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
sole cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plots with trap crops were found to decrease in a number of leafhopper while yields increased comparing to the sole cotton in every variety/line”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton leafhopper population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton leafhoppers laid more eggs in lateral than mid veins.

Organ / stage
lateral veine0
Interactor
leafhoppert0pest
Outcome
egg numberse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
mid veine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more egg numbers in the lateral vein than in the mid vein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton leafhopper population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton leafhopper egg counts did not differ significantly among tested cotton varieties or lines.

Material
varieties/linese0
Interactor
leafhoppert0pest
Outcome
oviposition preferencet0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences among test varieties/lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton leafhopper population and its oviposition preference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–95 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.