Paper · 1991 · Canadian Journal of Microbiology

Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for canola

Susan J. Grayston; James J. Germida

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
58
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Canola (Brassica napus) has a high sulfur requirement during vegetative growth and exhibits symptoms of sulfur deficiency when cropped on Saskatchewan soils low in plant available sulfur. Elemental sulfur (S 0 ) is frequently used as a fertilizer to alleviate this deficiency. The potential of sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms to enhance the growth of canola in S 0 fertilized soils was assessed. Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and fungi were isolated from the rhizosphere and rhizoplane of canola grown in four different Saskatchewan soils under growth chamber conditions. Of 273 bacterial isolates, 245 (89.7%) oxidized S 0 to thiosulfate or tetrathionate in vitro, and 133 (48.7%) oxidized S 0 to sulfate; 70 fungal isolates oxidized S 0 to sulfate. Eighteen bacterial isolates demonstrating the highest in vitro sulfur oxidation were tested as seed inoculants under growth chamber conditions, with S 0 as sulfur source. Fourteen isolates increased canola leaf size measured at the bud stage of growth, and seven isolates increased root and pod dry weights at maturity. Three of the 14 isolates were also able to stimulate canola leaf area in the presence of plant available sulfate. The shoot material from canola inoculated with two of these isolates contained more iron, sulfur, and magnesium than uninoculated canola. Three of the 14 isolates inhibited the growth of the canola fungal pathogens, Rhizoctonia solani AG2-1, R. solani AG4, and Leptosphaeria maculans "Leroy." Another isolate was antagonistic towards both R. solani strains and another inhibited the growth of R. solani AG2-1 and L. maculans "Leroy." Thus some sulfur-oxidizing isolates appear to stimulate canola growth due to the enhancement of mineral nutrient uptake, whereas in other cases antibiosis towards canola pathogens may also be involved. Key words: elemental sulfur, oxidation, canola, rhizosphere, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourteen bacterial isolates increased canola leaf size at the bud stage.

Organ / stage
bud stage of growthe0
Treatment
Fourteen isolatese0
Outcome
canola leaf sizee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fourteen isolates increased canola leaf size measured at the bud stage of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–998 · show in text ↑
e1

“Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven isolates increased canola root and pod dry weights at maturity.

Organ / stage
at maturitye0
Treatment
seven isolatese0
Outcome
root and pod dry weightse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seven isolates increased root and pod dry weights at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three isolates stimulated canola leaf area even with available sulfate.

Treatment
Three of the 14 isolatese0
Outcome
canola leaf areae0
Direction
stimulatee0
Qualifier
in the presence of plant available sulfatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three of the 14 isolates were also able to stimulate canola leaf area in the presence of plant available sulfate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two isolate inoculants increased iron, sulfur and magnesium in canola shoots.

Organ / stage
shoot materiale0
Treatment
inoculated with two of these isolatese0
Outcome
iron, sulfur, and magnesiume0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
uninoculated canolae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shoot material from canola inoculated with two of these isolates contained more iron, sulfur, and magnesium than uninoculated canola.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three isolates inhibited growth of three canola fungal pathogens.

Treatment
Three of the 14 isolatese0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG2-1Rhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
R. solani AG4Rhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
growth of the canola fungal pathogense0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
Leptosphaeria maculans "Leroy."e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three of the 14 isolates inhibited the growth of the canola fungal pathogens, Rhizoctonia solani AG2-1, R. solani AG4, and Leptosphaeria maculans "Leroy."”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1473 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Another isolate antagonized both R. solani strains.

Interactor
R. solani strainsRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
antagonistic towards both R. solani strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Another isolate was antagonistic towards both R. solani strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Another isolate inhibited R. solani AG2-1 and L. maculans growth.

Interactor
R. solani AG2-1Rhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
L. maculans "Leroy."Plenodomus lingame0pathogen
Outcome
growth of R. solani AG2-1 and L. maculans "Leroy."e0
Direction
inhibitede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Plenodomus lingam
Plenodomus lingam · Second interactorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“another inhibited the growth of R. solani AG2-1 and L. maculans "Leroy."”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1614 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some isolates appear to stimulate canola growth by enhancing mineral nutrient uptake.

Outcome
canola growthe0
Qualifier
enhancement of mineral nutrient uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some sulfur-oxidizing isolates appear to stimulate canola growth due to the enhancement of mineral nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1734 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antibiosis toward canola pathogens may also contribute to growth stimulation.

Outcome
canola growthe1
Qualifier
antibiosis towards canola pathogense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in other cases antibiosis towards canola pathogens may also be involved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1815 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1684 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.