Paper · 2010 · African Crop Science Journal

Effect of mulching on banana weevil movement relative to pheromone traps

W Tinzaara; CS Gold; M Dicke; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Banana weevil (Cosmopolites sordidus) is a major pest in East Africa causing yield losses of up to 14 metric tonnes per hectare annually. A study was conducted in Uganda to determine the effect of mulching on banana (Musa spp. L.) weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), movement relative to pheromone-baited traps. Three treatments were used to create different mulching levels: banana without mulch (control), banana with thin mulch (< 6 cm thick), and banana with thick mulch (15 cm thick). Pheromone trapswere placed in the plots and weevil trap catches were monitored. Weevil catches in pheromone traps from both mulched and unmulched plots were generally similar. The mulching level had no effect on the ratio of males to females recaptured. The numbers of weevils captured in pheromone traps were lower than in the wet season andwas not influenced by mulch levels. Mulching levels had a limited influence on the numbers of weevils recaptured from different directions. The results generally indicate that mulching has no effect on weevil catches in pheromone traps.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weevil trap catches were generally similar in mulched and unmulched banana plots.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
mulchede1
Interactor
Weevile1pest
Outcome
Weevil catches in pheromone trapse1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
unmulchede1

Verbatim

e1

“Weevil catches in pheromone traps from both mulched and unmulched plots were generally similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–696 · show in text ↑
e2

“banana (Musa spp. L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch level did not affect the ratio of male to female weevils recaptured.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
mulching levele1
Outcome
ratio of males to females recapturede1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The mulching level had no effect on the ratio of males to females recaptured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–774 · show in text ↑
e2

“banana (Musa spp. L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–230 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weevil captures in pheromone traps were lower than in the wet season.

Taxon
bananae2
Outcome
numbers of weevils captured in pheromone trapse1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
wet seasone1

Verbatim

e1

“The numbers of weevils captured in pheromone traps were lower than in the wet season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–860 · show in text ↑
e2

“banana (Musa spp. L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch level did not influence pheromone trap capture numbers.

Taxon
bananae3
Treatment
mulch levelse1
Outcome
numbers of weevils captured in pheromone trapse2
Direction
not influencede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“was not influenced by mulch levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–898 · show in text ↑
e2

“numbers of weevils captured in pheromone traps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–826 · show in text ↑
e3

“banana (Musa spp. L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch levels had limited influence on numbers of weevils recaptured from different directions.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
Mulching levelse1
Outcome
numbers of weevils recaptured from different directionse1
Direction
limited influencee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Mulching levels had a limited influence on the numbers of weevils recaptured from different directions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1002 · show in text ↑
e2

“banana (Musa spp. L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–230 · show in text ↑

mulching · molecular: metabolites · MusaPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

mulching · nutrient: content · MusaPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

mulching · pest · MusaPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.