Paper · 2011 · Plant Disease

Adaptation to Brassica Host Genotypes by a Single-Spore Isolate and Population of Plasmodiophora brassicae (Clubroot)

J. M. LeBoldus; V. P. Manolii; T. K. Turkington; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
70
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plasmodiophora brassicae, the cause of clubroot of crucifers, is an increasingly important pathogen of canola (Brassica napus) in Alberta, Canada. In response, clubroot-resistant canola genotypes are being deployed to help reduce yield losses. Two experiments were conducted to examine the effect on P. brassicae virulence of repeated exposure of a population and single-spore isolate of the pathogen to the same host. The first experiment examined changes in the index of disease over five cycles of infection on seven Brassica hosts (European Clubroot Differential [ECD] 02, ECD 04, ECD 05, ECD 15, '45H26', '45H29', and 08N823R). The second experiment tested the virulence of five cycled populations ('45H29', 08N823R, ECD 05, and ECD 15) and three cycled single-spore isolates ('45H29', 08N823R, and ECD05) on four resistant canola genotypes ('73-77', '73-67', VT-SD-09, and '9558C'). The results from these experiments clearly demonstrate the ability of both single-spore isolates and populations of P. brassicae to rapidly erode the resistance present in the two canola genotypes, '45H29' and 08N823R. Although the index of disease increased on these two genotypes, the four resistant canola genotypes remained resistant to all the cycled populations and single-spore isolates in the second experiment. These results underscore the importance of crop rotation in the management of clubroot in Alberta.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycled P. brassicae isolates and populations eroded resistance in two canola genotypes.

Material
'45H29' and 08N823Re0
Treatment
single-spore isolates and populations of P. brassicaee0
Interactor
P. brassicaePlasmodiophora brassicaee0pathogen
Outcome
resistancee0
Direction
erodee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plasmodiophora brassicae
Plasmodiophora brassicae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both single-spore isolates and populations of P. brassicae to rapidly erode the resistance present in the two canola genotypes, '45H29' and 08N823R.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease index increased on the two canola genotypes.

Interactor
Plasmodiophora brassicaePlasmodiophora brassicaet0pathogen
Outcome
index of diseasee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plasmodiophora brassicae
Plasmodiophora brassicae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the index of disease increased on these two genotypes, the four resistant canola genotypes remained resistant to all the cycled populations and single-spore isolates in the second experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plasmodiophora brassicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four resistant canola genotypes remained resistant to cycled populations and isolates.

Interactor
Plasmodiophora brassicaePlasmodiophora brassicaet0pathogen
Outcome
remained resistante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plasmodiophora brassicae
Plasmodiophora brassicae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the four resistant canola genotypes remained resistant to all the cycled populations and single-spore isolates in the second experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plasmodiophora brassicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors emphasized crop rotation for clubroot management in Alberta.

Interactor
Plasmodiophora brassicaePlasmodiophora brassicaee2pathogen
Outcome
crop rotatione0
Setting
Albertae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plasmodiophora brassicae
Plasmodiophora brassicae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results underscore the importance of crop rotation in the management of clubroot in Alberta.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1407 · show in text ↑
e1

“pathogen of canola (Brassica napus) in Alberta, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–145 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plasmodiophora brassicae, the cause of clubroot of crucifers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑

Plasmodiophora brassicae · disease · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.