Paper · 2008 · Plant Pathology

Effect of Glomus mosseae on concentrations of rosmarinic and caffeic acids and essential oil compounds in basil inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. basilici

J.‐P. Toussaint; M. Kraml; M. Nell; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
55
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study investigated the potential of the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus Glomus mosseae to protect basil ( Ocimum basilicum ) against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. basilici ( Fob ). It was hypothesised that G. mosseae could confer a bioprotective effect against Fob as a result of increases in leaf rosmarinic (RA) and caffeic acids (CA) or essential oil concentrations. Glomus mosseae conferred a bioprotective effect against Fob by reducing plant mortality to 20% compared to 33% in non‐mycorrhizal (NM) plants. This bioprotective effect was not related to improved phosphorus (P) nutrition, as AM and NM plants treated with Fob had similar shoot P concentrations (6 and 8 mg g −1 dry weight (DW), respectively). Both AM and NM plants treated with Fob had similar leaf and root RA and CA concentrations. Furthermore, phenolic (40–70 mg CA g −1 DW) or essential oil concentrations (0·1–0·6 mg g −1 DW) were not increased in plants treated with the AM fungus and Fob . Therefore, the bioprotective effect conferred by G. mosseae was not a result of increases in the phytochemicals tested in this study. However, under the AM symbiosis, basil plants treated with Fob had lower methyleugenol concentrations in their leaves (0·1 mg g −1 DW) than NM plants treated with the pathogen (0·6 mg g −1 DW).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus mosseae lowered Fusarium-associated basil mortality to 20% versus 33% without mycorrhiza.

Treatment
Glomus mosseaee0
Interactor
Fobe0pathogen
Second interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
plant mortalitye0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
non‐mycorrhizal (NM) plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glomus mosseae conferred a bioprotective effect against Fob by reducing plant mortality to 20% compared to 33% in non‐mycorrhizal (NM) plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“in basil inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. basilici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot P concentrations were similar in mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal Fusarium-treated plants.

Interactor
Fobe0pathogen
Outcome
shoot P concentrationse0
Value
6 and 8 mg g −1 dry weight (DW)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AM and NM plants treated with Fob had similar shoot P concentrations (6 and 8 mg g −1 dry weight (DW), respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“in basil inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. basilici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and root RA and CA concentrations were similar across mycorrhizal status with Fusarium.

Interactor
Fobe0pathogen
Outcome
leaf and root RA and CA concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both AM and NM plants treated with Fob had similar leaf and root RA and CA concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“in basil inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. basilici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenolic concentrations did not increase under AM fungus and Fusarium treatment.

Treatment
AM fungus and Fobe0
Interactor
Fobe0pathogen
Outcome
phenolice0
Direction
not increasede0
Value
40–70 mg CA g −1 DWe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phenolic (40–70 mg CA g −1 DW) or essential oil concentrations (0·1–0·6 mg g −1 DW) were not increased in plants treated with the AM fungus and Fob”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“in basil inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. basilici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil concentrations did not increase under AM fungus and Fusarium treatment.

Treatment
AM fungus and Fobe0
Interactor
Fobe0pathogen
Outcome
essential oil concentrationse0
Direction
not increasede0
Value
0·1–0·6 mg g −1 DWe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phenolic (40–70 mg CA g −1 DW) or essential oil concentrations (0·1–0·6 mg g −1 DW) were not increased in plants treated with the AM fungus and Fob”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“in basil inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. basilici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–161 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under mycorrhiza, Fusarium-treated basil had lower leaf methyleugenol than nonmycorrhizal plants.

Interactor
Fobe0pathogen
Outcome
methyleugenol concentrations in their leavese0
Direction
lowere0
Value
0·1 mg g −1 DWe0
Comparator
NM plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under the AM symbiosis, basil plants treated with Fob had lower methyleugenol concentrations in their leaves (0·1 mg g −1 DW) than NM plants treated with the pathogen (0·6 mg g −1 DW).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1298 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · quality: phytochemicals · Ocimum basilicum (basil)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.