Paper · 2008 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Antagonistic bacteria and their post-culture liquids in the protection of pea (Pisum sativum L.) from diseases

D. Pięta; A. Pastucha

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The purpose of the paper was to establish the protective effect of the microbiological material prepared from the cells of Bacillus sp. Bk 30 and Pseudomonas sp. Pk 28 and their post-culture liquids against soil-borne pathogenic fungi. The use of biological control improved the emergences, healthiness of pea plants and their yielding. Despite using the microbiological material for seed dressing, pea plants were infected by Altenaria alternata, Ascochyta pisi, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium culmorum, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi, Fusarium solani, Phoma exigua, Pythium irregulare, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Among the applied microbiological material, the best protective effect against plant pathogens was observed for bacterium Bacillus sp. Bk 30 and its postculture liquid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological control improved pea emergence.

Treatment
biological controle0
Outcome
emergencese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of biological control improved the emergences, healthiness of pea plants and their yielding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological control improved pea plant health.

Treatment
biological controle0
Outcome
healthiness of pea plantse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of biological control improved the emergences, healthiness of pea plants and their yielding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological control improved pea yield.

Treatment
biological controle0
Outcome
yieldinge0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of biological control improved the emergences, healthiness of pea plants and their yielding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Despite microbiological seed dressing, pea plants were infected by Alternaria, Ascochyta and Botrytis species.

Treatment
microbiological material for seed dressinge0
Interactor
Altenaria alternatae0pathogen
Outcome
pea plants were infectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Despite using the microbiological material for seed dressing, pea plants were infected by Altenaria alternata, Ascochyta pisi, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium culmorum, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi, Fusarium solani, Phoma exigua, Pythium irregulare, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus sp. Bk 30 showed the best protective effect against plant pathogens.

Treatment
Bacillus sp. Bk 30e0
Interactor
plant pathogense0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus sp. Bk 30e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
protective effect against plant pathogense0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
applied microbiological materiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the applied microbiological material, the best protective effect against plant pathogens was observed for bacterium Bacillus sp. Bk 30 and its postculture liquid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Bacillus sp. Bk 30 postculture liquid showed the best protective effect against plant pathogens.

Treatment
its postculture liquide0
Interactor
plant pathogense0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus sp. Bk 30e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
protective effect against plant pathogense0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
applied microbiological materiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the applied microbiological material, the best protective effect against plant pathogens was observed for bacterium Bacillus sp. Bk 30 and its postculture liquid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–96 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.