Paper · 2013 · Rice Research Open Access

Transplanting by Uprooting Tillers from Dibbled Field: An Idea for Crop Intensification and Sustainable Rice Cultivation

M Mamunur Rahman; MM Rashid

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was conducted in the field laboratory of Bangladesh Rice Research Institute to determine the suitable time for uprooting of the tillers from dibbled plots for transplanting as well as nitrogen management system in the transplanted field. It was revealed that uprooting of half of the tillers from dibbled plots did not reduce crop yield in the dibbled plots (after uprooting of half of the tillers) compared with dibbled plots without tiller uprooting. In both irrigated and rainfed management systems, transplanting with uprooted tillers from dibbled plot at 30 to 40 days after seeding (DAS) produced optimum yield. Significant yield reduction was observed when the uprooted tillers were transplanted after 40 DAS. In nitrogen fertilizer management system, two split of urea application was proved to be effective. Considering both tiller splitting time and urea fertilizer applications, uprooting of half of the tillers from dibbled plot at 30 DAS and transplanting to new areas with two split of urea application were found to be effective. This method of rice farming might be suitable for salinity affected coastal areas to escape detrimental effect of salinity during germination and early seedling establishment, as well as suitable to increase cropping intensity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing half the tillers from dibbled plots did not reduce yield relative to plots without removal.

Treatment
uprooting of half of the tillerse0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
did not reducee0
Comparator
dibbled plots without tiller uprootinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“uprooting of half of the tillers from dibbled plots did not reduce crop yield in the dibbled plots (after uprooting of half of the tillers) compared with dibbled plots without tiller uprooting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In irrigated and rainfed systems, transplanting uprooted tillers at 30 to 40 DAS produced optimum yield.

Treatment
transplanting with uprooted tillers from dibbled plot at 30 to 40 days after seeding (DAS)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
optimume0
Setting
irrigated and rainfed management systemse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both irrigated and rainfed management systems, transplanting with uprooted tillers from dibbled plot at 30 to 40 days after seeding (DAS) produced optimum yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting uprooted tillers after 40 DAS significantly reduced yield.

Treatment
transplanted after 40 DASe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant yield reduction was observed when the uprooted tillers were transplanted after 40 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two split urea applications were effective in nitrogen fertilizer management.

Treatment
two split of urea applicatione0
Outcome
effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In nitrogen fertilizer management system, two split of urea application was proved to be effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–830 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing half the tillers at 30 DAS and transplanting with two split urea applications was effective.

Treatment
uprooting of half of the tillers from dibbled plot at 30 DAS and transplanting to new areas with two split of urea applicatione0
Outcome
effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“uprooting of half of the tillers from dibbled plot at 30 DAS and transplanting to new areas with two split of urea application were found to be effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest this rice farming method for saline coastal areas to avoid salinity during early establishment and increase cropping intensity.

Outcome
suitable to increase cropping intensitye0
Qualifier
might be suitablee0
Setting
salinity affected coastal arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This method of rice farming might be suitable for salinity affected coastal areas to escape detrimental effect of salinity during germination and early seedling establishment, as well as suitable to increase cropping intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.