Abstract
The effectiveness of bacteria of the genera Sphingomonas and Bacillus, and yeasts of the genera Cryptococcus, Rhodotorula, and Saccharomyces as biological control agents against pathogens colonizing winter wheat, was tested in laboratory conditions. All of the tested yeast isolates had an inhibitory effect on the development of F. sporotrichioides colonies. Under the same conditions, the Sphingomonas S 11 isolate was antagonistic against F. avenaceum, F. culmorum, F. tricinctum, and F. graminearum. The seedlings of winter wheat cv. Sumai treated with a suspension of Sphingomonas S 11 bacteria and inoculated with F. culmorum demonstrated significantly fewer infection symptoms than unprotected seedlings that were inoculated with the above-mentioned pathogen.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Tested yeast isolates inhibited F. sporotrichioides colony development.
- Taxon
- Winter Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Interactor
- F. sporotrichioidesFusarium sporotrichioidese0pathogen
- Second interactor
- yeast isolatese0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- development of F. sporotrichioides coloniese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All of the tested yeast isolates had an inhibitory effect on the development of F. sporotrichioides colonies”
t0“Winter Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Sphingomonas S 11 antagonized four Fusarium species.
- Taxon
- Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Interactor
- F. avenaceum
Fusarium avenaceume0pathogen - Second interactor
- Sphingomonas S 11e0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- antagonistice0
- Qualifier
- F. culmorum, F. tricinctum, and F. graminearume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the Sphingomonas S 11 isolate was antagonistic against F. avenaceum, F. culmorum, F. tricinctum, and F. graminearum”
t0“Winter Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Sphingomonas S 11 treatment reduced F. culmorum infection symptoms in Sumai wheat seedlings.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- Sumaie0
- Treatment
- treated with a suspension of Sphingomonas S 11 bacteriae0
- Interactor
- F. culmorum
.jpg?width=60)
Fusarium culmorume0pathogen - Second interactor
- Sphingomonas S 11e0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- infection symptomse0
- Direction
- fewere0
- Comparator
- unprotected seedlingse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The seedlings of winter wheat cv. Sumai treated with a suspension of Sphingomonas S 11 bacteria and inoculated with F. culmorum demonstrated significantly fewer infection symptoms than unprotected seedlings that were inoculated with the above-mentioned pathogen”
The same questions in other papers
Sphingomonas · Fusarium culmorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · Fusarium culmorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.