Paper · 2014 · World Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of Different Phosphorus Fertilizer Rates on Growth, Dry Matter Yield and Yield Components of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Meseret Turuko; Amin Mohammed

5
claims
15
verbatim quotes
59
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an important cash crop and protein source for farmers in many parts of Ethiopia. However, its production is limited by phosphorus fertilizer. Therefore, field experiment was conducted at the Arba Minch farm field the main rain season of 2011 to investigate the responses of common bean to different levels of phosphorus fertilizer and its effect on growth, dry matter yield and yield component of the crop. Five phosphorus rates (0, 10, 20, 30 and 40kg ha-1) were used as treatments. Red Wolaita common bean variety was used as planting material. Recommended rate of N (60 kg/ha) was applied to all treatments. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The effect of phosphorus was significantly increased dry matter yield, yield components and growth parameters such as leaf area and number of branches per plant, whereas its effect was not significant on plant height. Based on result obtained, application of 20P kgha-1is recommended for better production of common bean at Arba Minch and similar areas which have the same soil property.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus rates significantly increased dry matter yield of common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
phosphorus ratese1
Outcome
dry matter yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
Arba Minch farm fielde4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an important cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Five phosphorus rates (0, 10, 20, 30 and 40kg ha-1) were used as treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–521 · show in text ↑
e2

“The effect of phosphorus was significantly increased dry matter yield, yield components and growth parameters such as leaf area and number of branches per plant, whereas its effect was not significant on plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–957 · show in text ↑
e4

“field experiment was conducted at the Arba Minch farm field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–251 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus rates significantly increased yield components of common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
phosphorus ratese1
Outcome
yield componentse2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an important cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Five phosphorus rates (0, 10, 20, 30 and 40kg ha-1) were used as treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–521 · show in text ↑
e2

“The effect of phosphorus was significantly increased dry matter yield, yield components and growth parameters such as leaf area and number of branches per plant, whereas its effect was not significant on plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus rates significantly increased leaf area and number of branches per plant of common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
phosphorus ratese1
Outcome
leaf area and number of branches per plante2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an important cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Five phosphorus rates (0, 10, 20, 30 and 40kg ha-1) were used as treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–521 · show in text ↑
e2

“The effect of phosphorus was significantly increased dry matter yield, yield components and growth parameters such as leaf area and number of branches per plant, whereas its effect was not significant on plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus rates had no significant effect on plant height of common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
phosphorus ratese1
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
not significante2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an important cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Five phosphorus rates (0, 10, 20, 30 and 40kg ha-1) were used as treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–521 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas its effect was not significant on plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–957 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 20 kg P ha-1 is recommended for better production of common bean at Arba Minch and similar areas.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
20P kgha-1e3
Outcome
better productione3
Setting
Arba Minche3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an important cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of 20P kgha-1is recommended for better production of common bean at Arba Minch and similar areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1093 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 53 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Phosphorus deficiency reduced root mass.

    Ethylene: a regulator of root architectural responses to soil phosphorus availability · 1999

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

118 papers: 96 positive, 22 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

114 papers more in this group

See all 118 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.