Paper · 1999 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Root Distribution and Yield of Direct Seeded and Transplanted Watermelon

D.S. NeSmith

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Transplanting generally results in more rapid stand establishment than direct seeding for cucurbit crops. A 2-year field study was conducted to examine the pattern of rooting of watermelon [ Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nak.] following usage of different planting methods, and to determine subsequent effects on crop yield. Root length was assessed by obtaining soil cores three times per growing season to a depth of 75 cm. Transplanted watermelons generally had greater root length density in the upper 30 cm of soil 4 to 7 weeks after planting (WAP). However, by 11 to 12 WAP root distribution was similar over the entire 75 cm soil profile for the two planting methods. Total marketable yields were comparable for direct seeded and transplanted watermelons during 1995, but transplanted watermelon yield exceeded direct seeded yield by 40% in 1996. In both years, 90% to 100% of the marketable yield of transplanted watermelons was obtained at the first harvest, compared to 0% to 55% for direct seeded watermelons. These findings suggest that rapid root proliferation of transplanted watermelons may be an important factor in their earlier establishment and increased early yields as compared to direct seeded watermelons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted watermelons generally had greater root length density than direct seeded ones in the upper 30 cm of soil 4 to 7 weeks after planting.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Transplantede1
Outcome
root length densitye1
Direction
greatere1
Qualifier
upper 30 cm of soil 4 to 7 weeks after plantinge1
Comparator
Direct Seededt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Direct Seeded and Transplanted Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transplanted watermelons generally had greater root length density in the upper 30 cm of soil 4 to 7 weeks after planting (WAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–560 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By 11 to 12 weeks after planting, root distribution was similar over the entire 75 cm soil profile for transplanted and direct seeded watermelon.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
two planting methodse2
Outcome
root distributione2
Direction
similare2
Qualifier
entire 75 cm soil profilee2
Comparator
Direct Seededt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Direct Seeded and Transplanted Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“by 11 to 12 WAP root distribution was similar over the entire 75 cm soil profile for the two planting methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total marketable yields were comparable for direct seeded and transplanted watermelons in 1995.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
transplantede3
Outcome
Total marketable yieldse3
Direction
comparablee3
Qualifier
during 1995e3
Comparator
direct seedede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Direct Seeded and Transplanted Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“Total marketable yields were comparable for direct seeded and transplanted watermelons during 1995”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted watermelon yield exceeded direct seeded yield by 40% in 1996.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
transplantede4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
exceedede4
Value
40%e4
Qualifier
in 1996e4
Comparator
direct seedede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Direct Seeded and Transplanted Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–72 · show in text ↑
e4

“transplanted watermelon yield exceeded direct seeded yield by 40% in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In both years, 90% to 100% of the marketable yield of transplanted watermelons was obtained at the first harvest, compared to 0% to 55% for direct seeded watermelons.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
transplantede5
Outcome
marketable yield of transplanted watermelons was obtained at the first harveste5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
90% to 100%e5
Qualifier
0% to 55% for direct seeded watermelonse5
Comparator
direct seeded watermelonse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Direct Seeded and Transplanted Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–72 · show in text ↑
e5

“In both years, 90% to 100% of the marketable yield of transplanted watermelons was obtained at the first harvest, compared to 0% to 55% for direct seeded watermelons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1026 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that rapid root proliferation of transplanted watermelons may be an important factor in their earlier establishment and increased early yields.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
transplantede6
Outcome
earlier establishment and increased early yieldse6
Qualifier
rapid root proliferatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Direct Seeded and Transplanted Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–72 · show in text ↑
e6

“rapid root proliferation of transplanted watermelons may be an important factor in their earlier establishment and increased early yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1193 · show in text ↑

transplanting · quality: postharvest · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

transplanting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.