Paper · 2005 · Bulletin of Entomological Research

Behavioural responses of diamondback mothPlutella xylostella(Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) to extracts derived fromMelia azedarachandAzadirachta indica

D.S. Charleston; R. Kfir; L.E.M. Vet; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
58
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The impact of three different doses of botanical insecticide derived from the syringa tree, Melia azedarach and the neem tree, Azadirachta indica was tested on the behaviour of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus). Both botanical insecticides had a significant impact on larval behaviour. At higher doses the extracts showed feeding deterrent activity, with larvae preferring the untreated sides of cabbage leaves and consuming less of the treated half of cabbage leaves. The botanical insecticides had less of an effect on the oviposition behaviour of P. xylostella moths. In laboratory and glasshouse trials, significantly fewer eggs were oviposited on the plants that had been treated with syringa extracts. Therefore, the syringa extracts appear to have a repellent effect. In contrast, when exposed to the neem extracts the moths did not discriminate between control plants and treated plants. Behavioural observation indicated that, despite the lower number of eggs oviposited on cabbage treated with syringa extracts, the moths chose cabbage treated with the highest dose of syringa more often than they chose control cabbage plants. Similar observations were found in cabbage plants treated with neem, moths chose the medium dose more often than they chose the control. Oviposition and feeding deterrent properties are important factors in pest control, and results from this study indicate that botanical insecticides have the potential to be incorporated into control programmes for P. xylostella in South Africa.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both botanical insecticides had a significant impact on diamondback moth larval behaviour.

Treatment
botanical insecticidese1
Outcome
larval behavioure1
Direction
had a significant impacte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher doses the extracts showed feeding deterrent activity, with larvae preferring the untreated sides of cabbage leaves and consuming less of the treated half of cabbage leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–486 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both botanical insecticides had a significant impact on larval behaviour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher doses the extracts were feeding deterrent to larvae, which consumed less of the treated cabbage leaves.

Treatment
higher dosese0
Interactor
larvaee0pest
Outcome
feeding deterrent activitye0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Comparator
untreated sides of cabbage leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher doses the extracts showed feeding deterrent activity, with larvae preferring the untreated sides of cabbage leaves and consuming less of the treated half of cabbage leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Syringa extracts significantly reduced the number of eggs oviposited on treated cabbage plants.

Treatment
syringa extractse1
Outcome
eggs were ovipositede1
Direction
fewere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher doses the extracts showed feeding deterrent activity, with larvae preferring the untreated sides of cabbage leaves and consuming less of the treated half of cabbage leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–486 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly fewer eggs were oviposited on the plants that had been treated with syringa extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Syringa extracts appear to have a repellent effect on diamondback moth oviposition.

Treatment
syringa extractse1
Outcome
repellent effecte1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the moths chose cabbage treated with the highest dose of syringa more often than they chose control cabbage plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1155 · show in text ↑
e1

“Therefore, the syringa extracts appear to have a repellent effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When exposed to neem extracts, moths did not discriminate between control and treated cabbage plants.

Treatment
neem extractse1
Interactor
mothse1pest
Outcome
discriminate between control plants and treated plantse1
Direction
did not discriminatee1
Comparator
control plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar observations were found in cabbage plants treated with neem, moths chose the medium dose more often than they chose the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1292 · show in text ↑
e1

“when exposed to the neem extracts the moths did not discriminate between control plants and treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moths chose cabbage treated with the highest dose of syringa more often than control cabbage.

Treatment
highest dose of syringae0
Interactor
mothse0pest
Outcome
chose cabbage treated with the highest dose of syringae0
Direction
more oftene0
Comparator
control cabbage plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the moths chose cabbage treated with the highest dose of syringa more often than they chose control cabbage plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moths chose the medium neem dose more often than the control on cabbage.

Treatment
neeme0
Interactor
mothse0pest
Outcome
chose the medium dosee0
Direction
more oftene0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar observations were found in cabbage plants treated with neem, moths chose the medium dose more often than they chose the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1292 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Botanical insecticides should be incorporated into control programmes for P. xylostella.

Interactor
P. xylostellae1pest
Outcome
incorporated into control programmes for P. xylostellae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the moths chose cabbage treated with the highest dose of syringa more often than they chose control cabbage plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1155 · show in text ↑
e1

“botanical insecticides have the potential to be incorporated into control programmes for P. xylostella in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1538 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · control · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · control · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

botanical · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 65 positive, 13 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.