Paper · 2015 · Journal of Animal Ecology

Plant resistance reduces the strength of consumptive and non‐consumptive effects of predators on aphids

Mônica F. Kersch‐Becker; Jennifer S. Thaler

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
50
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

1. The impact of predators on prey has traditionally been attributed to the act of consumption. Prey responses to the presence of the predator (non-consumptive effects), however, can be as important as predation itself. While plant defences are known to influence predator-prey interactions, their relative effects on consumptive vs. non-consumptive effects are not well understood. 2. We evaluated the consequences of plant resistance and predators (Hippodamia convergens) on the mass, number of nymphs, population growth, density and dispersal of aphids (Macrosiphum euphorbiae). We tested for the effects of plant resistance on non-consumptive and consumptive effects of predators on aphid performance and dispersal using a combination of path analysis and experimental manipulation of predation risk. 3. We manipulated plant resistance using genetically modified lines of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) that vary incrementally in the expression of the jasmonate pathway, which mediates induced resistance to insects and manipulated aphid exposure to lethal and risk predators. Predation risk predators had mandibles impaired to prevent killing. 4. Plant resistance reduced predation rate (consumptive effect) on high resistance plants. As a consequence, predators had no impact on the number of nymphs, aphid density or population growth on high resistance plants, whereas on low resistance plants, predators reduced aphid density by 35% and population growth by 86%. Path analysis and direct manipulation of predation risk showed that predation risk rather than predation rate promoted aphid dispersal and varied with host plant resistance. Aphid dispersal in response to predation risk was greater on low compared to high resistance plants. The predation risk experiment also showed that the number of aphid nymphs increased in the presence of risk predators but did not translate into increased population growth. 5. In conclusion, the consumptive and non-consumptive components of predators affect different aspects of prey demography, acting together to shape prey population dynamics. While predation risk accounts for most of the total effect of the predator on aphid dispersal and number of nymphs, the suppressive effect of predators on aphid population occurred largely through consumption. These effects are strongly influenced by plant resistance levels, suggesting that they are context dependent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant resistance reduced predator consumption on high resistance tomato plants.

Material
high resistance plantse0
Interactor
Hippodamia convergensHippodamia convergense1other
Second interactor
Macrosiphum euphorbiaeMacrosiphum euphorbiaee1pest
Outcome
predation ratee0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hippodamia convergens
Hippodamia convergens · InteractorKatja Schulz from Washington, D. C., USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrosiphum euphorbiae
Macrosiphum euphorbiae · Second interactorWhitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant resistance reduced predation rate (consumptive effect) on high resistance plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“predators (Hippodamia convergens) on the mass, number of nymphs, population growth, density and dispersal of aphids (Macrosiphum euphorbiae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predators had no impact on aphid nymph number, density or population growth on high resistance plants.

Treatment
predatorse0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
number of nymphs, aphid density or population growthe0
Direction
no impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“predators had no impact on the number of nymphs, aphid density or population growth on high resistance plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1366 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predators reduced aphid density by 35% on low resistance plants.

Material
low resistance plantse0
Treatment
predatorse0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on low resistance plants, predators reduced aphid density by 35% and population growth by 86%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1469 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predators reduced aphid population growth by 86% on low resistance plants.

Material
low resistance plantse0
Treatment
predatorse0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
population growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
86%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on low resistance plants, predators reduced aphid density by 35% and population growth by 86%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1469 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Risk predators increased the number of aphid nymphs.

Treatment
risk predatorse0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
number of aphid nymphse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of aphid nymphs increased in the presence of risk predators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1793–1863 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nymph increase under risk predators did not increase aphid population growth.

Treatment
risk predatorse0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
population growthe0
Direction
did not translate into increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of aphid nymphs increased in the presence of risk predators but did not translate into increased population growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1793–1918 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–905 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator suppression of aphid population occurred largely through consumption.

Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
suppressivee0
Qualifier
through consumptione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the suppressive effect of predators on aphid population occurred largely through consumption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2210–2302 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–905 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.