Paper · 2011 · Weed Technology

Confirmation, Control, and Physiology of Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in Arkansas

Jason K. Norsworthy; Dilpreet Riar; Prashant Jha; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed in Arkansas was reported in 2005. A study was conducted to (1) confirm and characterize the glyphosate resistance in giant ragweed, (2) determine if reduced absorption or translocation is the mechanism of glyphosate resistance in giant ragweed, and (3) evaluate the efficacy of nine POST-applied soybean herbicides to control glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible giant ragweed. Based on the rate required to kill 50% of plants (LD 50 values), resistant giant ragweed biotypes from Greene and Jefferson counties were 2.3- to 7.2-fold less sensitive to glyphosate compared to susceptible biotypes. Glyphosate absorption and translocation for glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible biotypes was similar at 24 and 72 h after treatment. Thus, differential absorption or translocation is not a mechanism of glyphosate resistance in this resistant giant ragweed biotype. Control of resistant giant ragweed biotypes with glyphosate at a labeled field application rate of 840 g ha −1 was only 60% or less compared to complete control of a susceptible giant ragweed biotype. However, bentazon, carfentrazone, cloransulam, and fomesafen controlled both biotypes more than 95%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant giant ragweed biotypes were 2.3- to 7.2-fold less sensitive to glyphosate than susceptible biotypes

Taxon
giant ragweedAmbrosia trifidae0
Material
resistant giant ragweed biotypese0
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
sensitive to glyphosatee0
Direction
lesse0
Value
2.3- to 7.2-folde0
Comparator
susceptible biotypese0
Setting
Greene and Jefferson countiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ambrosia trifida
Ambrosia trifida · TaxonLe.Loup.Gris · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“resistant giant ragweed biotypes from Greene and Jefferson counties were 2.3- to 7.2-fold less sensitive to glyphosate compared to susceptible biotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–630 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate absorption and translocation were similar in resistant and susceptible giant ragweed at 24 and 72 h

Taxon
Giant RagweedAmbrosia trifidat0
Material
glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible biotypese1
Outcome
absorption and translocatione1
Qualifier
at 24 and 72 h after treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ambrosia trifida
Ambrosia trifida · TaxonLe.Loup.Gris · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glyphosate absorption and translocation for glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible biotypes was similar at 24 and 72 h after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 840 g ha-1 controlled resistant giant ragweed to only 60% or less, compared with complete control of susceptible biotypes

Taxon
giant ragweedAmbrosia trifidae2
Treatment
glyphosate at a labeled field application rate of 840 g ha −1e2
Outcome
Controle2
Direction
lesse2
Value
60% or lesse2
Comparator
a susceptible giant ragweed biotypee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ambrosia trifida
Ambrosia trifida · TaxonLe.Loup.Gris · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e2

“Control of resistant giant ragweed biotypes with glyphosate at a labeled field application rate of 840 g ha −1 was only 60% or less compared to complete control of a susceptible giant ragweed biotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentazon, carfentrazone, cloransulam and fomesafen controlled both resistant and susceptible giant ragweed biotypes by more than 95%

Taxon
Giant RagweedAmbrosia trifidat0
Treatment
bentazon, carfentrazone, cloransulam, and fomesafene3
Outcome
controlled both biotypese3
Direction
moree3
Value
95%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ambrosia trifida
Ambrosia trifida · TaxonLe.Loup.Gris · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“bentazon, carfentrazone, cloransulam, and fomesafen controlled both biotypes more than 95%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1199 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differential absorption or translocation is not a mechanism of glyphosate resistance in this resistant giant ragweed biotype

Taxon
giant ragweedAmbrosia trifidae0
Compound
glyphosatee4
Outcome
mechanism of glyphosate resistancee4
Qualifier
differential absorption or translocatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ambrosia trifida
Ambrosia trifida · TaxonLe.Loup.Gris · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“resistant giant ragweed biotypes from Greene and Jefferson counties were 2.3- to 7.2-fold less sensitive to glyphosate compared to susceptible biotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–630 · show in text ↑
e4

“Thus, differential absorption or translocation is not a mechanism of glyphosate resistance in this resistant giant ragweed biotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–897 · show in text ↑

bentazone · control · Ambrosia trifida (giant ragweed)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fomesafen · control · Ambrosia trifida (giant ragweed)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.