Paper · 1990 · HortScience

Growth of Okra and Fruiting Pattern as Affected by Growth Regulators

Lurline Marsh; Rufus Jones; Mark Ellersieck

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Growth and fruiting pattern of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) cv . Clemson Spineless as affected by the growth regulators Alar ( N -dimethylaminosuccinamic acid) and ethephon (2-chloroethyl phosphoric acid) were evaluated in field studies. Eight treatments consisting of Alar at 600, 1200, 2400, and 3600 μl·liter -1 and ethephon at 200, 400, 600, and 800 μl·liter -1 and water control were applied as foliar sprays at the three- to four-true-leaf stage. Both growth regulators depressed shoot growth and leaf production. Ethephon reduced shoot length. Total fruit yield was not significantly affected by the treatments. However, ethephon-treated plants tended to produce fewer fruits and lagged behind Alar-treated plants and the control plants in Fruit production during the early harvests.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alar depressed okra shoot growth and leaf production.

Treatment
growth regulatorse0
Outcome
shoot growth and leaf productione0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both growth regulators depressed shoot growth and leaf production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth of Okra and Fruiting Pattern as Affected by Growth Regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon depressed okra shoot growth and leaf production.

Treatment
growth regulatorse0
Outcome
shoot growth and leaf productione0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both growth regulators depressed shoot growth and leaf production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth of Okra and Fruiting Pattern as Affected by Growth Regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon reduced okra shoot length.

Treatment
Ethephone0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon reduced shoot length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth of Okra and Fruiting Pattern as Affected by Growth Regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulator treatments did not significantly affect total fruit yield.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Total fruit yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total fruit yield was not significantly affected by the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth of Okra and Fruiting Pattern as Affected by Growth Regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon-treated okra tended to produce fewer fruits than Alar-treated and control plants during early harvests.

Treatment
ethephon-treated plantse0
Outcome
fruitse0
Direction
fewere0
Qualifier
early harvestse0
Comparator
Alar-treated plants and the control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethephon-treated plants tended to produce fewer fruits and lagged behind Alar-treated plants and the control plants in Fruit production during the early harvests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth of Okra and Fruiting Pattern as Affected by Growth Regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

class · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.