Paper · 2013 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

The effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on total plant nitrogen uptake and nitrogen recovery from soil organic material

S. SAIA; E. BENÍTEZ; J. M. GARCÍA-GARRIDO; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
67
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi increase nitrogen (N) uptake by their host plants, but their role in plant N capture from soil organic material is still unclear. In particular, it is not clear if AM fungi compete with the host plant for the N coming from the decomposing organic matter (OM), especially when the AM extraradical mycelium (ERM) and plant roots share the same soil volume. The goal of the present research was to study the effects of AM fungi on wheat N capture after the addition of 15 N-labelled OM to soil. Durum wheat ( Triticum durum ) was grown under controlled conditions in a sand:soil mix and the following treatments were applied: (1) AM inoculation with Glomus mosseae and uninoculated control; and (2) soil amended with 15 N-enriched maize leaves and unamended soil. The addition of OM reduced plant growth and N uptake. The AM fungi increased both plant growth and N uptake compared with uninoculated control plants and the effect was enhanced when wheat was grown in soil amended with OM compared with the unamended control. Although AM fungi increased soil N mineralization rates and total plant N uptake, they strongly reduced wheat N recovery from OM, suggesting that AM fungi have marked effects on competition between plants and bacteria for the different N sources in soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic matter addition reduced wheat growth and nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
soil amended with 15 N-enriched maize leavese1
Outcome
plant growth and N uptakee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
unamended soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of OM reduced plant growth and N uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–856 · show in text ↑
e1

“Durum wheat ( Triticum durum ) was grown under controlled conditions in a sand:soil mix and the following treatments were applied: (1) AM inoculation with Glomus mosseae and uninoculated control; and (2) soil amended with 15 N-enriched maize leaves and unamended soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal fungi increased wheat growth and nitrogen uptake relative to uninoculated controls.

Treatment
AM inoculation with Glomus mosseaee1
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
plant growth and N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The AM fungi increased both plant growth and N uptake compared with uninoculated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–952 · show in text ↑
e1

“Durum wheat ( Triticum durum ) was grown under controlled conditions in a sand:soil mix and the following treatments were applied: (1) AM inoculation with Glomus mosseae and uninoculated control; and (2) soil amended with 15 N-enriched maize leaves and unamended soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal fungi strongly reduced wheat nitrogen recovery from organic matter.

Treatment
AM inoculation with Glomus mosseaee1
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
wheat N recovery from OMe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
uninoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they strongly reduced wheat N recovery from OM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1191 · show in text ↑
e1

“Durum wheat ( Triticum durum ) was grown under controlled conditions in a sand:soil mix and the following treatments were applied: (1) AM inoculation with Glomus mosseae and uninoculated control; and (2) soil amended with 15 N-enriched maize leaves and unamended soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–802 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

inoculation · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 24 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.