Paper · 2002 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Effects of Row Spacing, Support Plant Species and Support Plant Mixture Ratio on Seed Yield and Yield Characteristics of Hungarian Vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz)

S. Iptas

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effects of row spacing (17.5 or 35.0 cm), support plant species (barley or triticale) and the proportion of crops in mixtures (no support plant or support plant 20, 40 or 60 %, respectively) on the seed yield and yield characteristics of Hungarian vetch ( Vicia pannonica Crantz) were investigated. Increasing the row spacing increased the seed yield of V. pannonica from 881.0 to 1248.0 kg ha −1 . On average, in a pure stand the seed yield of V. pannonica was 1141.0 kg ha −1 . In mixtures with barley and triticale, the seed yield of V. pannonica averaged 986.0 and 1143.0 kg ha −1 , respectively. In single mixed stands the seed yield of V . pannonica varied between 551.0 kg ha −1 (60 % support plant barley) and 1603.0 kg ha −1 (20 % support plant triticale). The yield advantage of V. pannonica in this triticale mixture was 40 % compared to the V. pannonica pure stand. With respect to the total yield in the mixture with 20 % triticale (1902.0 kg ha −1 ) the yield advantage over the V. pannonica pure stand was as high as 65.1 %. In the mixed stands the number of seeds per pod and the thousand‐seed weight of V. pannonica were higher than in V. pannonica pure stands.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider row spacing increased vetch seed yield from 881.0 to 1248.0 kg ha −1.

Taxon
V. pannonicaVicia pannonicae0
Treatment
row spacinge0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1248.0 kg ha −1e0
Qualifier
881.0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia pannonica
Vicia pannonica · TaxonFornax · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the row spacing increased the seed yield of V. pannonica from 881.0 to 1248.0 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–409 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pure-stand vetch seed yield averaged 1141.0 kg ha −1.

Taxon
V. pannonicaVicia pannonicae0
Treatment
pure stande0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Value
1141.0 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia pannonica
Vicia pannonica · TaxonFornax · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in a pure stand the seed yield of V. pannonica was 1141.0 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–490 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch seed yield averaged 986.0 kg ha −1 in barley mixtures.

Taxon
V. pannonicaVicia pannonicae0
Treatment
barleye0
Interactor
barleyHordeum vulgaree0other
Outcome
seed yielde0
Value
986.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia pannonica
Vicia pannonica · TaxonFornax · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · InteractorJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In mixtures with barley and triticale, the seed yield of V. pannonica averaged 986.0 and 1143.0 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–597 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch seed yield averaged 1143.0 kg ha −1 in triticale mixtures.

Taxon
V. pannonicaVicia pannonicae0
Treatment
triticalee0
Interactor
triticale×Triticosecalee0other
Outcome
seed yielde0
Value
1143.0 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia pannonica
Vicia pannonica · TaxonFornax · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In mixtures with barley and triticale, the seed yield of V. pannonica averaged 986.0 and 1143.0 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–597 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60% barley mixture yielded 551.0 kg ha −1 of vetch seed.

Taxon
V . pannonicaVicia pannonicae0
Treatment
60 % support plant barleye0
Interactor
barleyHordeum vulgaree0other
Outcome
seed yielde0
Value
551.0 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia pannonica
Vicia pannonica · TaxonFornax · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · InteractorJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seed yield of V . pannonica varied between 551.0 kg ha −1 (60 % support plant barley) and 1603.0 kg ha −1 (20 % support plant triticale)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20% triticale mixture yielded 1603.0 kg ha −1 of vetch seed.

Taxon
V . pannonicaVicia pannonicae0
Treatment
20 % support plant triticalee0
Interactor
triticale×Triticosecalee0other
Outcome
seed yielde0
Value
1603.0 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia pannonica
Vicia pannonica · TaxonFornax · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seed yield of V . pannonica varied between 551.0 kg ha −1 (60 % support plant barley) and 1603.0 kg ha −1 (20 % support plant triticale)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20% triticale mixture had a 40% vetch yield advantage over pure stand.

Taxon
V. pannonicaVicia pannonicae0
Treatment
triticale mixturee0
Interactor
triticale×Triticosecalee0other
Outcome
yield advantagee0
Direction
advantagee0
Value
40 %e0
Comparator
V. pannonica pure stande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia pannonica
Vicia pannonica · TaxonFornax · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield advantage of V. pannonica in this triticale mixture was 40 % compared to the V. pannonica pure stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total yield in the 20% triticale mixture was 1902.0 kg ha −1, a 65.1% advantage over pure vetch.

Taxon
V. pannonicaVicia pannonicae0
Treatment
mixture with 20 % triticalee0
Interactor
triticale×Triticosecalee0other
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
advantagee0
Value
1902.0 kg ha −1e0
Qualifier
65.1 %e0
Comparator
V. pannonica pure stande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia pannonica
Vicia pannonica · TaxonFornax · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total yield in the mixture with 20 % triticale (1902.0 kg ha −1 ) the yield advantage over the V. pannonica pure stand was as high as 65.1 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed stands had more seeds per pod and higher thousand-seed weight than pure stands.

Taxon
V. pannonicaVicia pannonicae0
Treatment
mixed standse0
Outcome
number of seeds per pod and the thousand‐seed weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
V. pannonica pure standse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia pannonica
Vicia pannonica · TaxonFornax · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the mixed stands the number of seeds per pod and the thousand‐seed weight of V. pannonica were higher than in V. pannonica pure stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1190 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Vicia pannonicaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.