Paper · 2003 · Canadian Journal of Soil Science

Sulphur fertilizer and tillage effects on early season sulphur availability and N:S ratio in canola in western Canada

C. A. Grant; A. M. Johnston; G. W. Clayton

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
29
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta over 3 yr evaluated immediate and residual effects of source, timing and placement of S fertilizers on sulphate-S supply to canola (Brassica napus L.). The treatments were compared under conventional tillage (CT) and in the establishment years of a reduced (RT) system. Sulphate-S in the soil was measured for two weeks after seeding, using PRS TM -probes. Sulphur concentration and N:S ratio were measured in canola tissue at flowering. Tillage system had little effect on available sulphate, tissue S concentration, N:S ratio or response to S fertilization. Ammonium sulphate (AS) generally increased tissue S concentration and reduced N:S ratio with all placements, and the effects of surface-applied ammonium thiosulphate (ATS) were similar to the effects of AS. Tiger 90, a bentonite-elemental S formulation, generally produced lower S concentrations in canola tissue at flowering than did AS, and levels were similar with elemental S and Tiger 90. Both tissue S concentration and N:S ratio were good indicators of S sufficiency for canola. Sulphate carryover from AS increased tissue S concentration and decreased N:S ratio in the year following application. In contrast, increases in tissue S concentration and decreases in N:S ratio were lower with Tiger 90 than AS. The oxidation of the residual elemental S in Tiger 90 could not be relied upon to increase tissue S concentration above deficiency levels in the year following application where soil sulphate levels were low. Key words: Elemental S, bentonite S, zero tillage, N:S ratio, PRS-probes

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage had little effect on sulphate availability, tissue sulphur, N:S ratio, or fertilizer response.

Treatment
Tillage systeme0
Outcome
available sulphate, tissue S concentration, N:S ratioe0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tillage system had little effect on available sulphate, tissue S concentration, N:S ratio or response to S fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulphate increased tissue sulphur concentration across placements.

Treatment
Ammonium sulphate (AS)e0
Outcome
tissue S concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
with all placementse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium sulphate (AS) generally increased tissue S concentration and reduced N:S ratio with all placements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulphate reduced the tissue N:S ratio across placements.

Treatment
Ammonium sulphate (AS)e0
Outcome
N:S ratioe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium sulphate (AS) generally increased tissue S concentration and reduced N:S ratio with all placements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface applied ammonium thiosulphate had effects similar to ammonium sulphate.

Treatment
surface-applied ammonium thiosulphate (ATS)e0
Outcome
effects of surface-applied ammonium thiosulphate (ATS)e0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
ASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of surface-applied ammonium thiosulphate (ATS) were similar to the effects of AS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tiger 90 produced lower canola tissue sulphur concentrations than ammonium sulphate.

Organ / stage
floweringe0
Treatment
Tiger 90e0
Outcome
S concentrations in canola tissuee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tiger 90, a bentonite-elemental S formulation, generally produced lower S concentrations in canola tissue at flowering than did AS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elemental sulphur and Tiger 90 produced similar tissue sulphur levels.

Treatment
elemental Se0
Outcome
levelse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
Tiger 90e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“levels were similar with elemental S and Tiger 90”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue sulphur concentration and N:S ratio were good indicators of canola sulphur sufficiency.

Outcome
good indicators of S sufficiencye0
Comparator
tissue S concentration and N:S ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both tissue S concentration and N:S ratio were good indicators of S sufficiency for canola.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1097 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carryover sulphate from ammonium sulphate increased tissue sulphur in the next year.

Treatment
Sulphate carryover from ASe0
Outcome
tissue S concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
year following applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulphate carryover from AS increased tissue S concentration and decreased N:S ratio in the year following application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carryover sulphate from ammonium sulphate decreased tissue N:S ratio in the next year.

Treatment
Sulphate carryover from ASe0
Outcome
N:S ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulphate carryover from AS increased tissue S concentration and decreased N:S ratio in the year following application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tiger 90 produced smaller subsequent increases in tissue sulphur than ammonium sulphate.

Treatment
Tiger 90e0
Outcome
increases in tissue S concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases in tissue S concentration and decreases in N:S ratio were lower with Tiger 90 than AS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tiger 90 produced smaller subsequent decreases in tissue N:S ratio than ammonium sulphate.

Treatment
Tiger 90e0
Outcome
decreases in N:S ratioe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases in tissue S concentration and decreases in N:S ratio were lower with Tiger 90 than AS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual elemental sulphur in Tiger 90 could not reliably raise tissue sulphur above deficiency where soil sulphate was low.

Treatment
residual elemental S in Tiger 90e0
Outcome
tissue S concentratione0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
where soil sulphate levels were lowe0
Comparator
deficiency levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The oxidation of the residual elemental S in Tiger 90 could not be relied upon to increase tissue S concentration above deficiency levels in the year following application where soil sulphate levels were low.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99 · show in text ↑

ammonium sulfate · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.