Paper · 2014 · Annals of Botany

Stem extension and mechanical stability of Xanthium canadense grown in an open or in a dense stand

Ryoji Watari; Hisae Nagashima; Tadaki Hirose

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Plants in open, uncrowded habitats typically have relatively short stems with many branches, whereas plants in crowded habitats grow taller and more slender at the expense of mechanical stability. There seems to be a trade-off between height growth and mechanical stability, and this study addresses how stand density influences stem extension and consequently plant safety margins against mechanical failure. METHODS: Xanthium canadense plants were grown either solitarily (S-plants) or in a dense stand (D-plants) until flowering. Internode dimensions and mechanical properties were measured at the metamer level, and the critical buckling height beyond which the plant elastically buckles under its own weight and the maximum lateral wind force the plant can withstand were calculated. KEY RESULTS: Internodes were longer in D- than S-plants, but basal diameter did not differ significantly. Relative growth rates of internode length and diameter were negatively correlated to the volumetric solid fraction of the internode. Internode dry mass density was higher in S- than D-plants. Young's modulus of elasticity and the breaking stress were higher in lower metamers, and in D- than in S-plants. Within a stand, however, both moduli were positively related to dry mass density. The buckling safety factor, a ratio of critical buckling height to actual height, was higher in S- than in D-plants. D-plants were found to be approaching the limiting value 1. Lateral wind force resistance was higher in S- than in D-plants, and increased with growth in S-plants. CONCLUSIONS: Critical buckling height increased with height growth due mainly to an increase in stem stiffness and diameter and a reduction in crown/stem mass ratio. Lateral wind force resistance was enhanced due to increased tissue strength and diameter. The increase in tissue stiffness and strength with height growth plays a crucial role in maintaining a safety margin against mechanical failure in herbaceous species that lack the capacity for secondary growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Internodes were longer in dense-stand Xanthium canadense plants than in solitary plants.

Organ / stage
Internodese0
Treatment
dense stande1
Outcome
Internodese0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
solitarily (S-plants)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium var. canadense
Xanthium strumarium var. canadense · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Internodes were longer in D- than S-plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“Xanthium canadense plants were grown either solitarily (S-plants) or in a dense stand (D-plants) until flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal diameter did not differ significantly between dense-stand and solitary Xanthium canadense plants.

Treatment
dense stande1
Outcome
basal diametere0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
solitarily (S-plants)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium var. canadense
Xanthium strumarium var. canadense · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“basal diameter did not differ significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–914 · show in text ↑
e1

“Xanthium canadense plants were grown either solitarily (S-plants) or in a dense stand (D-plants) until flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–552 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rates of internode length and diameter were negatively correlated with the volumetric solid fraction of the internode.

Organ / stage
internodee0
Outcome
Relative growth rates of internode length and diametere0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Qualifier
volumetric solid fraction of the internodee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium var. canadense
Xanthium strumarium var. canadense · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative growth rates of internode length and diameter were negatively correlated to the volumetric solid fraction of the internode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1047 · show in text ↑
e1

“Xanthium canadense plants were grown either solitarily (S-plants) or in a dense stand (D-plants) until flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Internode dry mass density was higher in solitary than in dense-stand Xanthium canadense plants.

Organ / stage
Internodee0
Treatment
solitarily (S-plants)e1
Outcome
Internode dry mass densitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
in a dense stand (D-plants)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium var. canadense
Xanthium strumarium var. canadense · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Internode dry mass density was higher in S- than D-plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Xanthium canadense plants were grown either solitarily (S-plants) or in a dense stand (D-plants) until flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Young's modulus of elasticity and breaking stress were higher in dense-stand than in solitary Xanthium canadense plants.

Treatment
dense stande1
Outcome
Young's modulus of elasticity and the breaking stresse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
solitarily (S-plants)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium var. canadense
Xanthium strumarium var. canadense · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Young's modulus of elasticity and the breaking stress were higher in lower metamers, and in D- than in S-plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Xanthium canadense plants were grown either solitarily (S-plants) or in a dense stand (D-plants) until flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–552 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Young's modulus of elasticity and breaking stress were higher in lower metamers of Xanthium canadense.

Organ / stage
lower metamerse0
Outcome
Young's modulus of elasticity and the breaking stresse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium var. canadense
Xanthium strumarium var. canadense · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Young's modulus of elasticity and the breaking stress were higher in lower metamers, and in D- than in S-plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Xanthium canadense plants were grown either solitarily (S-plants) or in a dense stand (D-plants) until flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–552 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within a stand, Young's modulus and breaking stress were positively related to internode dry mass density in Xanthium canadense.

Outcome
both modulie0
Direction
positively relatede0
Qualifier
dry mass densitye0
Setting
Within a stande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium var. canadense
Xanthium strumarium var. canadense · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Within a stand, however, both moduli were positively related to dry mass density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1301 · show in text ↑
e1

“Xanthium canadense plants were grown either solitarily (S-plants) or in a dense stand (D-plants) until flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The buckling safety factor was higher in solitary than in dense-stand Xanthium canadense plants.

Treatment
solitarily (S-plants)e1
Outcome
buckling safety factore0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
in a dense stand (D-plants)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium var. canadense
Xanthium strumarium var. canadense · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The buckling safety factor, a ratio of critical buckling height to actual height, was higher in S- than in D-plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1418 · show in text ↑
e1

“Xanthium canadense plants were grown either solitarily (S-plants) or in a dense stand (D-plants) until flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–552 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dense-stand Xanthium canadense plants approached the buckling limiting value of 1.

Outcome
buckling safety factore2
Qualifier
D-plants were found to be approaching the limiting value 1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium var. canadense
Xanthium strumarium var. canadense · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Xanthium canadense plants were grown either solitarily (S-plants) or in a dense stand (D-plants) until flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–552 · show in text ↑
e2

“The buckling safety factor, a ratio of critical buckling height to actual height, was higher in S- than in D-plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1418 · show in text ↑
e3

“D-plants were found to be approaching the limiting value 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1478 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lateral wind force resistance was higher in solitary than in dense-stand Xanthium canadense plants.

Treatment
solitarily (S-plants)e1
Outcome
Lateral wind force resistancee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
in a dense stand (D-plants)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium var. canadense
Xanthium strumarium var. canadense · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lateral wind force resistance was higher in S- than in D-plants, and increased with growth in S-plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1582 · show in text ↑
e1

“Xanthium canadense plants were grown either solitarily (S-plants) or in a dense stand (D-plants) until flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–552 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lateral wind force resistance increased with growth in solitary Xanthium canadense plants.

Outcome
Lateral wind force resistancee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
with growth in S-plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium var. canadense
Xanthium strumarium var. canadense · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lateral wind force resistance was higher in S- than in D-plants, and increased with growth in S-plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1582 · show in text ↑
e1

“Xanthium canadense plants were grown either solitarily (S-plants) or in a dense stand (D-plants) until flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–552 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical buckling height increased with height growth, mainly through stem stiffness and diameter and a lower crown/stem mass ratio.

Outcome
Critical buckling height increasede0
Qualifier
due mainly to an increase in stem stiffness and diameter and a reduction in crown/stem mass ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium var. canadense
Xanthium strumarium var. canadense · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Critical buckling height increased with height growth due mainly to an increase in stem stiffness and diameter and a reduction in crown/stem mass ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1748 · show in text ↑
e1

“Xanthium canadense plants were grown either solitarily (S-plants) or in a dense stand (D-plants) until flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–552 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lateral wind force resistance was enhanced by increased tissue strength and diameter in Xanthium canadense.

Outcome
Lateral wind force resistance was enhancede0
Qualifier
due to increased tissue strength and diametere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium var. canadense
Xanthium strumarium var. canadense · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lateral wind force resistance was enhanced due to increased tissue strength and diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1838 · show in text ↑
e1

“Xanthium canadense plants were grown either solitarily (S-plants) or in a dense stand (D-plants) until flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–552 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing tissue stiffness and strength with height growth plays a role in keeping a safety margin against mechanical failure in Xanthium canadense.

Outcome
safety margin against mechanical failuree0
Qualifier
The increase in tissue stiffness and strength with height growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium strumarium var. canadense
Xanthium strumarium var. canadense · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in tissue stiffness and strength with height growth plays a crucial role in maintaining a safety margin against mechanical failure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1840–1983 · show in text ↑
e1

“Xanthium canadense plants were grown either solitarily (S-plants) or in a dense stand (D-plants) until flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–552 · show in text ↑