Paper · 1996 · Journal of Experimental Botany

The beneficial effect of reduced elongation growth on submergence tolerance of rice

Timothy Louis Setter; Eufrocino Vidonia Laureles

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
180
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Adverse effects of elongation growth on tolerance to complete submergence for up to 14 d were evaluated in rice seedlings of cultivars which differed in submergence tolerance. There is a good negative correlation between per cent survival and elongation growth of genotypes during complete submergence (r = − 0.81). When elongation growth underwater is minimized by application of a gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitor, per cent survival increases by as much as 50 times for one cultivar. These effects are likely related to elongation growth since (i) addition of gibberellin had the opposite effect by reducing survival, and (ii) when the elongation inhibitor and gibberellin were added together, there was no effect on elongation growth and the per cent survival did not change. A GA-deficient mutant of rice which had little elongation ability during submergence showed a high level of submergence tolerance when plants were submerged at equal initial dry weights and carbohydrate levels relative to a submergence-tolerant cultivar. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that elongation growth competes with maintenance processes for energy and hence reduces survival during submergence. The impact of these findings is that in environments where elongation ability is not required, there is a potential to increase submergence tolerance of agriculturally important cultivars by selecting for least elongation, at least during periods of complete submergence. Furthermore, this trade-off between stimulated elongation growth and submergence tolerance will have important ecological consequences for the distribution of plant species in different flood-prone environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice genotype survival and elongation during complete submergence were negatively correlated (r = − 0.81).

Organ / stage
genotypese0
Outcome
per cent survivale0
Direction
negativee0
Value
r = − 0.81e0
Qualifier
elongation growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There is a good negative correlation between per cent survival and elongation growth of genotypes during complete submergence (r = − 0.81).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–315 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitor that minimized underwater elongation increased survival as much as 50 times in one rice cultivar.

Material
one cultivare0
Treatment
application of a gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitore0
Outcome
per cent survivale0
Direction
increasese0
Value
50 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When elongation growth underwater is minimized by application of a gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitor, per cent survival increases by as much as 50 times for one cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added gibberellin reduced rice survival under submergence.

Treatment
addition of gibberelline0
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of gibberellin had the opposite effect by reducing survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining elongation inhibitor and gibberellin did not change rice elongation growth.

Treatment
elongation inhibitor and gibberellin were added togethere0
Outcome
elongation growthe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when the elongation inhibitor and gibberellin were added together, there was no effect on elongation growth and the per cent survival did not change.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining elongation inhibitor and gibberellin did not change rice survival.

Treatment
elongation inhibitor and gibberellin were added togethere0
Outcome
per cent survivale0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when the elongation inhibitor and gibberellin were added together, there was no effect on elongation growth and the per cent survival did not change.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A GA-deficient rice mutant with little elongation showed high submergence tolerance at matched initial dry weight and carbohydrates.

Material
GA-deficient mutante0
Outcome
submergence tolerancee0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
equal initial dry weights and carbohydrate levelse0
Comparator
submergence-tolerant cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A GA-deficient mutant of rice which had little elongation ability during submergence showed a high level of submergence tolerance when plants were submerged at equal initial dry weights and carbohydrate levels relative to a submergence-tolerant cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–1035 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that elongation growth competes with maintenance for energy and reduces rice survival under submergence.

Outcome
survivale0
Direction
reducese0
Qualifier
elongation growth competes with maintenance processes for energye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results are consistent with the hypothesis that elongation growth competes with maintenance processes for energy and hence reduces survival during submergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest selecting for minimal elongation to raise submergence tolerance where elongation is unnecessary.

Outcome
selecting for least elongatione0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
during periods of complete submergencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is a potential to increase submergence tolerance of agriculturally important cultivars by selecting for least elongation, at least during periods of complete submergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1473 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑

class · survival · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

class · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 62 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.