Paper · 2010 · HortScience

Growth, Biomass, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Containerized Fraser Fir (Abies fraseri) as Related to Irrigation and Nitrogen Fertilization

Pascal Nzokou; Bert M. Cregg

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Growth and nutrient uptake of containerized fraser fir ( Abies fraseri) seedlings in response to irrigation and fertilization was investigated for 2 years in a greenhouse experiment. Height and stem diameter growth increased 12% to 35% and 4% to 32%, respectively, with increased irrigation. There was an inverse relationship between irrigation and foliar nitrogen content and no irrigation effect on foliar phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, and manganese. Irrigation increased foliar calcium. Approximately 2.0% to 4.5% of applied nitrogen was lost through leaching. Increases in total biomass in high irrigation treatments were caused by higher root and stem biomass. Higher irrigation treatments increased nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and assimilatory nitrogen use efficiency probably as a result of increase in carbon assimilation efficiency leading to increase in net primary productivity. There was no clear effect on the root weight ratio, but the index nitrogen availability per unit of foliage indicated a higher availability in plants receiving the lowest irrigation. This suggests that under water stress, the decrease in assimilation and NUE may be buffered by an increase in the plant's ability to provide nitrogen and other nutrients to various organs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Height growth increased by 12% to 35% with increased irrigation.

Taxon
fraser firt0
Treatment
increased irrigatione0
Outcome
Heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12% to 35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Height and stem diameter growth increased 12% to 35% and 4% to 32%, respectively, with increased irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–291 · show in text ↑
t0

“fraser fir”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem diameter growth increased by 4% to 32% with increased irrigation.

Taxon
fraser firt0
Treatment
increased irrigatione0
Outcome
stem diameter growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4% to 32%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Height and stem diameter growth increased 12% to 35% and 4% to 32%, respectively, with increased irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation was inversely related to foliar nitrogen content.

Taxon
Fraser Firt0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
foliar nitrogen contente0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“There was an inverse relationship between irrigation and foliar nitrogen content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–372 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation had no effect on foliar phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and manganese.

Taxon
Fraser Firt0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
foliar phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, and manganesee0
Direction
no irrigation effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“no irrigation effect on foliar phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, and manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased foliar calcium.

Taxon
Fraser Firt0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
foliar calciume0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased foliar calcium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Approximately 2.0% to 4.5% of applied nitrogen was lost through leaching.

Taxon
Fraser Firt0
Outcome
applied nitrogen was lost through leachinge0
Value
2.0% to 4.5%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Approximately 2.0% to 4.5% of applied nitrogen was lost through leaching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–567 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–72 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High irrigation increased total biomass through greater root and stem biomass.

Taxon
Fraser Firt0
Treatment
high irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
total biomasse0
Direction
Increasese0
Qualifier
higher root and stem biomasse0

Verbatim

e0

“Increases in total biomass in high irrigation treatments were caused by higher root and stem biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher irrigation increased nitrogen use efficiency and assimilatory nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
Fraser Firt0
Treatment
Higher irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and assimilatory nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Higher irrigation treatments increased nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and assimilatory nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–72 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher irrigation may raise nitrogen use efficiency through increased carbon assimilation and net primary productivity.

Taxon
Fraser Firt0
Outcome
net primary productivitye0
Qualifier
increase in carbon assimilation efficiencye0

Verbatim

e0

“probably as a result of increase in carbon assimilation efficiency leading to increase in net primary productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation had no clear effect on root weight ratio.

Taxon
Fraser Firt0
Outcome
root weight ratioe0
Direction
no clear effecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was no clear effect on the root weight ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest irrigation gave a higher index of nitrogen availability per unit foliage.

Taxon
Fraser Firt0
Treatment
lowest irrigatione0
Outcome
index nitrogen availability per unit of foliagee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the index nitrogen availability per unit of foliage indicated a higher availability in plants receiving the lowest irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–72 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water stress, nutrient supply to organs may buffer reduced assimilation and nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
Fraser Firt0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
assimilation and NUEe0
Qualifier
increase in the plant's ability to provide nitrogen and other nutrients to various organse0

Verbatim

e0

“This suggests that under water stress, the decrease in assimilation and NUE may be buffered by an increase in the plant's ability to provide nitrogen and other nutrients to various organs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fraser Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–72 · show in text ↑