Abstract
The effect of salinity was observed on the activity of nitrate reductase and hill reaction activity in the leaves of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cv. “CIM 496” grown in large size plastic pot culture, irrigated with sea salt concentrations of 0.0%(EC iw: 0.6 dS/m), 0.4%(EC iw: 6.2 dS/m) and 0.8%(EC iw: 10.8 dS/m) and subjected to foliar application with non-spray (control), water spray, KNO3 (500 ppm), KCl (500 ppm), Urea(1000 ppm), Fe-EDTA (5ppm), MnCl2 (5ppm) and MoO3 (5ppm) alone and their mixture. Foliar spray of the mixture showed better result as compared to that of above mentioned individual mineral. Conclusion made on the comparative performance of nitrate reductase and hill reaction enzymes under above number of treatments in the leaves of cotton growing under various sea salt concentrations is given below: Nitrate Reductase Activity (NRA): Nonspray< water spray< KCl< Mo< KNO3< Urea< KNO3 + Mo< KNO3 +Fe + Mn + Mo; Hill Reaction Activity (HRA): Nonspray< water spray< KNO3<Fe<Mn< KNO3 + Fe< KNO3 +Mn <KNO3 +Fe + Mn + Mo.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar spray of the mineral mixture gave better results than the individual minerals under salinity.
- Taxon
- Gossypium hirsutum L.
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Material
- CIM 496e0
- Treatment
- Foliar spray of the mixturee2
- Outcome
- resulte2
- Direction
- bettere2
- Qualifier
- sea salt concentrations of 0.0%(EC iw: 0.6 dS/m), 0.4%(EC iw: 6.2 dS/m) and 0.8%(EC iw: 10.8 dS/m)e1
- Comparator
- individual minerale2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in the leaves of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cv. “CIM 496””
e1“irrigated with sea salt concentrations of 0.0%(EC iw: 0.6 dS/m), 0.4%(EC iw: 6.2 dS/m) and 0.8%(EC iw: 10.8 dS/m) and subjected to foliar application with non-spray (control), water spray, KNO3 (500 ppm), KCl (500 ppm), Urea(1000 ppm), Fe-EDTA (5ppm), MnCl2 (5ppm) and MoO3 (5ppm) alone and their mixture”
e2“Foliar spray of the mixture showed better result as compared to that of above mentioned individual mineral”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrate reductase activity in cotton leaves ranked from non-spray (lowest) to KNO3 + Fe + Mn + Mo (highest).
- Taxon
- Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
- Material
- CIM 496e0
- Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Treatment
- foliar application with non-spray (control), water spray, KNO3 (500 ppm)e1
- Outcome
- Nitrate Reductase Activity (NRA)e3
- Direction
- Nonspray< water spray< KCl< Mo< KNO3< Urea< KNO3 + Mo< KNO3 +Fe + Mn + Moe3
- Comparator
- non-spray (control)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in the leaves of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cv. “CIM 496””
e1“irrigated with sea salt concentrations of 0.0%(EC iw: 0.6 dS/m), 0.4%(EC iw: 6.2 dS/m) and 0.8%(EC iw: 10.8 dS/m) and subjected to foliar application with non-spray (control), water spray, KNO3 (500 ppm), KCl (500 ppm), Urea(1000 ppm), Fe-EDTA (5ppm), MnCl2 (5ppm) and MoO3 (5ppm) alone and their mixture”
e3“Nitrate Reductase Activity (NRA): Nonspray< water spray< KCl< Mo< KNO3< Urea< KNO3 + Mo< KNO3 +Fe + Mn + Mo”
Claim · model-written summary
Hill reaction activity in cotton leaves ranked from non-spray (lowest) to KNO3 + Fe + Mn + Mo (highest).
- Taxon
- Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
- Material
- CIM 496e0
- Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Treatment
- foliar application with non-spray (control), water spray, KNO3 (500 ppm)e1
- Outcome
- Hill Reaction Activity (HRA)e4
- Direction
- Nonspray< water spray< KNO3<Fe<Mn< KNO3 + Fe< KNO3 +Mn <KNO3 +Fe + Mn + Moe4
- Comparator
- non-spray (control)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in the leaves of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cv. “CIM 496””
e1“irrigated with sea salt concentrations of 0.0%(EC iw: 0.6 dS/m), 0.4%(EC iw: 6.2 dS/m) and 0.8%(EC iw: 10.8 dS/m) and subjected to foliar application with non-spray (control), water spray, KNO3 (500 ppm), KCl (500 ppm), Urea(1000 ppm), Fe-EDTA (5ppm), MnCl2 (5ppm) and MoO3 (5ppm) alone and their mixture”
e4“Hill Reaction Activity (HRA): Nonspray< water spray< KNO3<Fe<Mn< KNO3 + Fe< KNO3 +Mn <KNO3 +Fe + Mn + Mo”
The same questions in other papers
application · physiology: enzyme activity · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.