Paper · 2006 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Development of Standard Concentrations of Foliar Nutrients for Saskatoon

A. M. Zatylny; R. G. St-Pierre

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Soil and foliar samples were collected from saskatoon orchards in Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Alberta, Canada from 1997 to 1999 and analyzed for macro- and micronutrient content. Foliar samples were collected twice a month from the end of May until September in 1997 to examine the pattern of change in foliar nutrient concentrations throughout the season and to determine the most stable time period for foliar sampling. This period was determined to be from the last week in July until mid-August. Nutrient concentrations of foliar samples collected during this period from 1997 to 1999 were summarized according to the mean, median, minimum, and maximum values. Mean foliar nutrient concentrations were as follows: 2.48% nitrogen (N), 0.18% phosphorus (P), 1.15% potassium (K), 0.15% sulfur (S), 1.52% calcium (Ca), 0.50% magnesium (Mg), 6.9 ppm copper (Cu), 106 ppm iron (Fe), 124 ppm manganese (Mn), 16 ppm zinc (Zn), and 27 ppm boron (B). A number of significant positive correlations were found between soil and foliar levels of a nutrient, with the majority of these correlations occurring for the nutrients Cu, P, and Mn. Another study conducted during 2001–2002 examined differences in the foliar nutrient concentrations of the saskatoon cultivars ‘Smoky’ and ‘Thiessen’ sampled from nine orchards in Saskatchewan. Foliar concentrations of N, K, S, Ca, Mg, Cu, Mn, Zn, and B were significantly higher in ‘Smoky’ than in ‘Thiessen,’ whereas foliar K content was higher in ‘Thiessen’ than in ‘Smoky’.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most stable period for saskatoon foliar nutrient sampling was the last week in July to mid-August.

Taxon
Saskatoont0
Outcome
most stable time period for foliar samplinge0
Value
from the last week in July until mid-Auguste0

Verbatim

t0

“Saskatoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“to determine the most stable time period for foliar sampling. This period was determined to be from the last week in July until mid-August.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–508 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean saskatoon foliar nitrogen (N) concentration was 2.48%.

Taxon
Saskatoont0
Outcome
nitrogen (N)e0
Value
2.48%e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Verbatim

t0

“Saskatoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“2.48% nitrogen (N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–745 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean saskatoon foliar phosphorus (P) concentration was 0.18%.

Taxon
Saskatoont0
Outcome
phosphorus (P)e0
Value
0.18%e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Verbatim

t0

“Saskatoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“0.18% phosphorus (P)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–767 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean saskatoon foliar potassium (K) concentration was 1.15%.

Taxon
Saskatoont0
Outcome
potassium (K)e0
Value
1.15%e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Verbatim

t0

“Saskatoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“1.15% potassium (K)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–788 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean saskatoon foliar sulfur (S) concentration was 0.15%.

Taxon
Saskatoont0
Outcome
sulfur (S)e0
Value
0.15%e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Verbatim

t0

“Saskatoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“0.15% sulfur (S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–806 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean saskatoon foliar calcium (Ca) concentration was 1.52%.

Taxon
Saskatoont0
Outcome
calcium (Ca)e0
Value
1.52%e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Verbatim

t0

“Saskatoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“1.52% calcium (Ca)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–826 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean saskatoon foliar magnesium (Mg) concentration was 0.50%.

Taxon
Saskatoont0
Outcome
magnesium (Mg)e0
Value
0.50%e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Verbatim

t0

“Saskatoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“0.50% magnesium (Mg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–848 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean saskatoon foliar copper (Cu) concentration was 6.9.

Taxon
Saskatoont0
Outcome
copper (Cu)e0
Value
6.9e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Verbatim

t0

“Saskatoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“6.9 ppm copper (Cu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean saskatoon foliar iron (Fe) concentration was 106.

Taxon
Saskatoont0
Outcome
iron (Fe)e0
Value
106e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Verbatim

t0

“Saskatoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“106 ppm iron (Fe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–888 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean saskatoon foliar manganese (Mn) concentration was 124.

Taxon
Saskatoont0
Outcome
manganese (Mn)e0
Value
124e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Verbatim

t0

“Saskatoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“124 ppm manganese (Mn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–912 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean saskatoon foliar zinc (Zn) concentration was 16.

Taxon
Saskatoont0
Outcome
zinc (Zn)e0
Value
16e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Verbatim

t0

“Saskatoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“16 ppm zinc (Zn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–930 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean saskatoon foliar boron (B) concentration was 27.

Taxon
Saskatoont0
Outcome
boron (B)e0
Value
27e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Verbatim

t0

“Saskatoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“27 ppm boron (B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–952 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and foliar nutrient levels had significant positive correlations, mostly for Cu, P, and Mn.

Taxon
Saskatoont0
Outcome
foliar levels of a nutriente0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
Cu, P, and Mne0
Setting
soile0

Verbatim

t0

“Saskatoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A number of significant positive correlations were found between soil and foliar levels of a nutrient, with the majority of these correlations occurring for the nutrients Cu, P, and Mn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The listed nine foliar nutrient concentrations were significantly higher in Smoky than Thiessen.

Taxon
Saskatoont0
Material
‘Smoky’e0
Outcome
Foliar concentrations of N, K, S, Ca, Mg, Cu, Mn, Zn, and Be0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
‘Thiessen’e1

Verbatim

t0

“Saskatoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar concentrations of N, K, S, Ca, Mg, Cu, Mn, Zn, and B were significantly higher in ‘Smoky’ than in ‘Thiessen,’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1450 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Thiessen’ than in ‘Smoky’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1517 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar K was higher in Thiessen than Smoky.

Taxon
Saskatoont0
Material
‘Thiessen’e0
Outcome
foliar K contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
‘Smoky’e0

Verbatim

t0

“Saskatoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar K content was higher in ‘Thiessen’ than in ‘Smoky’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1517 · show in text ↑