Paper · 2011 · Atom Indonesia

The Effects of Gamma Irradiation on the Growth and Propagation of In-Vitro Chrysanthemum Shoot Explants (cv. Yellow Puma)

I. Dwimahyani; S. Widiarsih

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The study on the effect of gamma irradiation on in-vitro shoot growth of chrysanthemum cv. Yellow Puma has been carried out. The aim of the study was to observe genetic variability of shoot growth caused by gamma irradiation. Shoot explants with four leaves were irradiated by gamma with dose of 10, 15 and 20 Gy with 3 replications at each of dose. The irradiated shoot explants were then transferred into fresh MS solid medium and placed in a growth room. Observation was performed on number of leaves and branches on M1V0 generation, while plantlets height and number of branches were observed a M1V1 generation. Number of survival plantlets and multiplication rate on three subsequent subcultures were observed as well. Results showed that gamma rays with dose of 20 Gy inhibited growth of leaves as much as 50% compared to control (shoots without irradiation), and branches 73.7% in three weeks. Observation on multiplication rate at M1V1 generation showed that gamma irradiation with dose of 10 Gy promoted multiplication rate as much as 10% higher than control. It can be concluded that in vitro mutagenesis using gamma iradiation with dose of 10 to 15 Gy can be used for inducing genetic variability of chrysanthemum cv. Yellow Puma. Received: 18 December 2008; Revised: 10 August 2010; Accepted: 30 August 2010

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma irradiation at 20 Gy inhibited leaf growth of in vitro chrysanthemum shoots by as much as 50% compared with unirradiated shoots.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Material
cv. Yellow Pumae0
Treatment
gamma rays with dose of 20 Gye1
Outcome
growth of leavese1
Direction
inhibitede1
Value
50%e1
Comparator
control (shoots without irradiation)e1
Setting
in-vitroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in-vitro shoot growth of chrysanthemum cv. Yellow Puma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“gamma rays with dose of 20 Gy inhibited growth of leaves as much as 50% compared to control (shoots without irradiation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma irradiation at 20 Gy inhibited branch growth of in vitro chrysanthemum shoots by 73.7% over three weeks.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Material
cv. Yellow Pumae0
Treatment
gamma rays with dose of 20 Gye2
Outcome
branchese2
Direction
inhibitede2
Value
73.7%e2
Qualifier
in three weekse2
Comparator
control (shoots without irradiation)e2
Setting
in-vitroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in-vitro shoot growth of chrysanthemum cv. Yellow Puma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“gamma rays with dose of 20 Gy inhibited growth of leaves as much as 50% compared to control (shoots without irradiation), and branches 73.7% in three weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma irradiation at 10 Gy raised the multiplication rate at the M1V1 generation by as much as 10% over control.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Material
cv. Yellow Pumae0
Treatment
gamma irradiation with dose of 10 Gye3
Outcome
multiplication ratee3
Direction
promotede3
Value
10%e3
Qualifier
at M1V1 generatione3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in-vitro shoot growth of chrysanthemum cv. Yellow Puma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“Observation on multiplication rate at M1V1 generation showed that gamma irradiation with dose of 10 Gy promoted multiplication rate as much as 10% higher than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1067 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro mutagenesis with 10 to 15 Gy gamma irradiation can be used to induce genetic variability in chrysanthemum cv. Yellow Puma.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Material
cv. Yellow Pumae0
Treatment
gamma iradiation with dose of 10 to 15 Gye4
Outcome
inducing genetic variabilitye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in-vitro shoot growth of chrysanthemum cv. Yellow Puma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–102 · show in text ↑
e4

“It can be concluded that in vitro mutagenesis using gamma iradiation with dose of 10 to 15 Gy can be used for inducing genetic variability of chrysanthemum cv. Yellow Puma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1240 · show in text ↑

radiation · pest · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

radiation · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

20 papers: 10 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.