Paper · 2014 · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

Postharvest Quality of Refrigerated Tomato Fruit (Solanum lycopersicum, cv. Zinac) at Two Maturity Stages Following Heat Treatment

Joaquina Pinheiro; Carla Alegria; Marta Abreu; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of water heat treatment (WHT, immersion in a water bath at 40C – 30 min) application in alternative to the conventional decontamination treatment of chlorinated water (150 ppm at 5C, pH 6.5 during 2 min) on tomato (cv. Zinac) at two maturity stages (turning and pink). Physiochemical attributes, enzymatic activities and microbial load were evaluated after treatments and during 14 days of storage at 10C. The WHT applied was very effective on microbial reduction and delayed physiochemical changes of tomato, namely firmness loss and red color development during storage period, especially at turning maturity stage. Based on the firmness parameter, shelf-life of control and WHT samples were determined. Our results provide strong evidence that postharvest WHT (40C – 30 min) for tomato fruits at turning maturity stage guarantees the overall quality at 10C twice as long of fruits washed with chlorinated water. Practical Applications Tomato is a popular fruit due to its high nutritional value and culinary versatility. However, tomato shelf-life is limited, especially if commercialized in an advanced maturity stage. Water heat treatment (WHT) is a promised postharvest processing to extend quality of fresh crop. WHT (40C – 30 min) applied to whole tomato (cv. “Zinac”) was found to be effective for microbial reduction and guarantees its overall quality at 10C for a double period, especially in early maturity stages, compared with conventional treatments, without presenting the chemical risks associated to by-products of chlorinated water.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water heat treatment reduced microbial load on tomato fruit.

Treatment
WHTe0
Outcome
microbial reductione0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The WHT applied was very effective on microbial reduction and delayed physiochemical changes of tomato, namely firmness loss and red color development during storage period, especially at turning maturity stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water heat treatment delayed firmness loss in tomato during storage, especially at turning maturity.

Organ / stage
turning maturity stagee0
Treatment
WHTe0
Outcome
firmness losse0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The WHT applied was very effective on microbial reduction and delayed physiochemical changes of tomato, namely firmness loss and red color development during storage period, especially at turning maturity stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water heat treatment delayed red color development in tomato during storage, especially at turning maturity.

Organ / stage
turning maturity stagee0
Treatment
WHTe0
Outcome
red color developmente0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The WHT applied was very effective on microbial reduction and delayed physiochemical changes of tomato, namely firmness loss and red color development during storage period, especially at turning maturity stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest heat treatment of turning-stage tomato maintained overall quality at 10C twice as long as chlorinated-water washing.

Organ / stage
turning maturity stagee0
Treatment
WHT (40C – 30 min)e0
Outcome
overall qualitye0
Direction
twice as longe0
Value
twice as longe0
Comparator
fruits washed with chlorinated watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results provide strong evidence that postharvest WHT (40C – 30 min) for tomato fruits at turning maturity stage guarantees the overall quality at 10C twice as long of fruits washed with chlorinated water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–946 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

36 papers: 29 positive, 7 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

heat · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.