Abstract
To mitigate environmental stresses, use of aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)-deaminase containing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as agricultural inputs for improved crop production is required. A total of 47 bacterial isolates from different rhizospheric soils of chickpea from Punjab were biochemically characterized and found to be representatives of genus Bacillus (25) and Pseudomonas (22). Ten (10) of the isolates were able to utilize ACC as a sole source of nitrogen, maximum growth (in terms of optical density λ600) being recorded with Bacillus isolate 23-B (0.463) followed by Pseudomonas 6-P (0.317). Three isolates were P-solubilizers and their relative P-solubilization efficiency ranged from 14.6 to 21.6 mg/100 ml culture broth. All the isolates produced Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (4.4-22.8 µg/ml). Two PGPR’s 23-B and 6-P alone and in combination with recommended (for Punjab state) Mesorhizobium ciceris, were evaluated for water stress mitigation and plant growth promotion under axenic conditions on Cicer arietinum varieties (Kabuli L-552 and Desi GPF-2). Both the rhizobacteria significantly improved germination, root and shoot length and fresh weight of chickpea seedlings under osmotic potential of up to 0.4 MPa over uninoculated control. Proline content was considerably higher in PGPR treated varieties of chickpea under water stress. Co-inoculation of 23-B with Mesorhizobium enhanced all growth parameters under water stress. Key words: Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)-deaminase, axenic, chickpea, polyethylene glycol (PEG), proline.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Both rhizobacteria improved chickpea germination, root and shoot length, and fresh weight under water stress.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- Both the rhizobacteriae0
- Outcome
- germination, root and shoot length and fresh weighte0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Qualifier
- under osmotic potential of up to 0.4 MPae0
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Both the rhizobacteria significantly improved germination, root and shoot length and fresh weight of chickpea seedlings under osmotic potential of up to 0.4 MPa over uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Proline content was higher in PGPR-treated chickpea under water stress.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- PGPR treatede0
- Outcome
- Proline contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- under water stresse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Proline content was considerably higher in PGPR treated varieties of chickpea under water stress”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation of 23-B with Mesorhizobium enhanced chickpea growth parameters under water stress.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Co-inoculation of 23-B with Mesorhizobiume0
- Interactor
- Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobiume0symbiont - Outcome
- all growth parameterse0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“Co-inoculation of 23-B with Mesorhizobium enhanced all growth parameters under water stress”
The same questions in other papers
Mesorhizobium · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
148 papers more in this group
See all 152 papers →inoculation · physiology: osmolytes · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.