Paper · 2013 · African Journal of Microbiology Research

Efficacy of aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)-deaminase-producing rhizobacteria in ameliorating water stress in chickpea under axenic conditions

Sharma Palika; Khanna Veena; Kumari Poonam

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
66
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To mitigate environmental stresses, use of aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)-deaminase containing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as agricultural inputs for improved crop production is required. A total of 47 bacterial isolates from different rhizospheric soils of chickpea from Punjab were biochemically characterized and found to be representatives of genus Bacillus (25) and Pseudomonas (22). Ten (10) of the isolates were able to utilize ACC as a sole source of nitrogen, maximum growth (in terms of optical density λ600) being recorded with Bacillus isolate 23-B (0.463) followed by Pseudomonas 6-P (0.317). Three isolates were P-solubilizers and their relative P-solubilization efficiency ranged from 14.6 to 21.6 mg/100 ml culture broth. All the isolates produced Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (4.4-22.8 µg/ml). Two PGPR’s 23-B and 6-P alone and in combination with recommended (for Punjab state) Mesorhizobium ciceris, were evaluated for water stress mitigation and plant growth promotion under axenic conditions on Cicer arietinum varieties (Kabuli L-552 and Desi GPF-2). Both the rhizobacteria significantly improved germination, root and shoot length and fresh weight of chickpea seedlings under osmotic potential of up to 0.4 MPa over uninoculated control. Proline content was considerably higher in PGPR treated varieties of chickpea under water stress. Co-inoculation of 23-B with Mesorhizobium enhanced all growth parameters under water stress. Key words: Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)-deaminase, axenic, chickpea, polyethylene glycol (PEG), proline.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both rhizobacteria improved chickpea germination, root and shoot length, and fresh weight under water stress.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Both the rhizobacteriae0
Outcome
germination, root and shoot length and fresh weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
under osmotic potential of up to 0.4 MPae0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the rhizobacteria significantly improved germination, root and shoot length and fresh weight of chickpea seedlings under osmotic potential of up to 0.4 MPa over uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content was higher in PGPR-treated chickpea under water stress.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
PGPR treatede0
Outcome
Proline contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under water stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline content was considerably higher in PGPR treated varieties of chickpea under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation of 23-B with Mesorhizobium enhanced chickpea growth parameters under water stress.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Co-inoculation of 23-B with Mesorhizobiume0
Interactor
MesorhizobiumMesorhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
all growth parameterse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“Co-inoculation of 23-B with Mesorhizobium enhanced all growth parameters under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1475 · show in text ↑

Mesorhizobium · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 135 positive, 17 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

inoculation · physiology: osmolytes · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.