Paper · 1990 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Fertilizer placement studies on calcareous and non‐calcareous chernozemic soils: Growth, P‐UP‐take, oil content and yield of Canadian rape

L.D. Bailey; C.A. Grant

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments were conducted on calcareous and non‐calcareous Orthic Black Chemozemic soils over a five year period to study the effect of rates and placements of P‐fertilizer on Canadian rape (Brassica napus L. cv Tower) production. Six rates of P as mono‐ammonium phosphate (MAP) were applied at seeding using four placement methods: i) broadcast and cultivated 10 cm into the soil (BC); ii) banded in the seed row with the seed (PWS); iii) banded 2.5 below and 2.5 cm to the side of the seed (PSS); iv) banded 2.5 cm directly below the seed (PBS). Soil type had no significant effect on rape growth, seed yield and P‐uptake. Rape responded best to P‐fertilizer banded with (PWS) or near (PSS, PBS) the seed. But, placing 15 kg/ha P or greater with the seed reduced seedling emergence; with 25 kg P/ha insufficient plants emerged to justify harvesting. The reduced seedling emergence resulted in reduced seed yield and P‐uptake. Maximum yields were obtained when the fertilizer was banded 2.5 cm away from the seed (PSS, PBS). The BC method produced the least growth, yield and P‐uptake responses of the four methods. Only when broadcast rates of P were in excess of 10 kg/ha did rape dry matter, seed and P‐uptake increase. Banding 10 kg/ha with or near to the seed was equivalent to broadcasting 25 kg/ha in terms of seed yield and P‐uptake. Application of P fertilizer also increased seed protein and oil concentrations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil type did not significantly affect growth, yield or P uptake.

Outcome
rape growth, seed yield and P‐uptakee0
Direction
no significant effecte0
Setting
Soil typee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil type had no significant effect on rape growth, seed yield and P‐uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rape responded best when P fertilizer was banded with or near the seed.

Treatment
P‐fertilizer banded with (PWS) or near (PSS, PBS) the seede0
Outcome
responded beste0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rape responded best to P‐fertilizer banded with (PWS) or near (PSS, PBS) the seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–723 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At least 15 kg/ha P placed with seed reduced emergence.

Treatment
15 kg/ha P or greater with the seede0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“placing 15 kg/ha P or greater with the seed reduced seedling emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25 kg P/ha with seed, too few plants emerged to justify harvest.

Outcome
insufficient plants emergede0
Value
25 kg P/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with 25 kg P/ha insufficient plants emerged to justify harvesting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–138 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced seedling emergence reduced seed yield and P uptake.

Organ / stage
seedlinge0
Outcome
seed yield and P‐uptakee0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduced seedling emergence resulted in reduced seed yield and P‐uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer banding 2.5 cm from the seed gave maximum yields.

Treatment
fertilizer was banded 2.5 cm away from the seed (PSS, PBS)e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum yields were obtained when the fertilizer was banded 2.5 cm away from the seed (PSS, PBS).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast and cultivated placement gave the least growth, yield and P uptake responses.

Treatment
BC methode0
Outcome
growth, yield and P‐uptake responsese0
Direction
leaste0
Comparator
four methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The BC method produced the least growth, yield and P‐uptake responses of the four methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast P above 10 kg/ha increased dry matter, seed and P uptake.

Treatment
broadcast rates of P were in excess of 10 kg/hae0
Outcome
rape dry matter, seed and P‐uptakee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only when broadcast rates of P were in excess of 10 kg/ha did rape dry matter, seed and P‐uptake increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banding 10 kg/ha with or near seed matched broadcasting 25 kg/ha for seed yield and P uptake.

Treatment
Banding 10 kg/ha with or near to the seede0
Outcome
seed yield and P‐uptakee0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
broadcasting 25 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Banding 10 kg/ha with or near to the seed was equivalent to broadcasting 25 kg/ha in terms of seed yield and P‐uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer increased seed protein and oil concentrations.

Treatment
P fertilizere0
Outcome
seed protein and oil concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P fertilizer also increased seed protein and oil concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1438 · show in text ↑
t0

“rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–138 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

29 papers: 21 positive, 8 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

transplanting · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

336 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.