Paper · 2011 · Plant Disease

Effect of Application Frequency and Reduced Rates of Acibenzolar-S-Methyl on the Field Efficacy of Induced Resistance Against Bacterial Spot on Tomato

Cheng-Hua Huang; Gary E. Vallad; Shouan Zhang; et al.

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
75
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM), a plant activator known to induce systemic acquired resistance, has demonstrated an ability to manage a number of plant diseases, including bacterial spot on tomato caused by four distinct Xanthomonas spp. The aim of this study was to evaluate application rate and frequency of ASM in order to optimize field efficacy against bacterial spot in Florida, while minimizing its impact on marketable yields. ASM was applied biweekly (once every 2 weeks) as a foliar spray at a constant concentration of 12.9, 64.5, and 129 μM throughout four field experiments during 2007-08. A standard copper program and an untreated control were also included. Overall, biweekly applications of ASM did not significantly reduce disease development or the final disease severity of bacterial spot compared with the copper-mancozeb standard or the untreated control. Only one experiment showed a significant reduction in the final disease severity on plants treated with ASM at 129 μM compared with the untreated control. Three additional field trials conducted during 2009-10 to evaluate the effects of weekly and biweekly applications of ASM at concentrations of 30.3 to 200 μM found that weekly applications provided significantly better disease control than biweekly applications. The tomato yields were not statistically improved with the use of ASM relative to the untreated control and standard copper program. Weekly ASM applications at rates as low as 75 μM (equivalent to 1.58 g a.i./ha in 100 liters of water or 0.21 oz. a.i./acre in 100 gallons of water) to 200 μM (equivalent to 4.20 g a.i./ha in 100 liters of water or 0.56 oz. a.i./acre in 100 gallons of water) were statistically equivalent in managing bacterial spot of tomato without significantly reducing yield compared with the untreated control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biweekly ASM did not significantly reduce bacterial spot development or final severity versus copper-mancozeb or untreated control.

Treatment
biweekly applications of ASMe0
Interactor
Xanthomonas spp.Xanthomonase1pathogent0
Outcome
disease development or the final disease severity of bacterial spote0
Direction
did not significantly reducee0
Comparator
copper-mancozeb standard or the untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Xanthomonas
Xanthomonas · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biweekly applications of ASM did not significantly reduce disease development or the final disease severity of bacterial spot compared with the copper-mancozeb standard or the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial spot on tomato caused by four distinct Xanthomonas spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In one experiment, ASM at 129 μM significantly reduced final disease severity versus untreated control.

Treatment
ASM at 129 μMe0
Interactor
Xanthomonas spp.Xanthomonase1pathogent0
Outcome
final disease severitye0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Xanthomonas
Xanthomonas · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only one experiment showed a significant reduction in the final disease severity on plants treated with ASM at 129 μM compared with the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial spot on tomato caused by four distinct Xanthomonas spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly ASM provided significantly better bacterial spot control than biweekly application.

Treatment
weekly applicationse0
Interactor
Xanthomonas spp.Xanthomonase1pathogent0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
biweekly applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Xanthomonas
Xanthomonas · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weekly applications provided significantly better disease control than biweekly applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial spot on tomato caused by four distinct Xanthomonas spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ASM did not statistically improve tomato yields versus untreated control or standard copper.

Treatment
ASMe0
Outcome
tomato yieldse0
Direction
not statistically improvede0
Comparator
untreated control and standard copper programe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tomato yields were not statistically improved with the use of ASM relative to the untreated control and standard copper program.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly ASM at 75 to 200 μM gave statistically equivalent bacterial spot management.

Treatment
Weekly ASM applications at rates as low as 75 μMe0
Interactor
Xanthomonas spp.Xanthomonase1pathogent0
Outcome
managing bacterial spote0
Direction
statistically equivalente0
Comparator
200 μMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Xanthomonas
Xanthomonas · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weekly ASM applications at rates as low as 75 μM (equivalent to 1.58 g a.i./ha in 100 liters of water or 0.21 oz. a.i./acre in 100 gallons of water) to 200 μM (equivalent to 4.20 g a.i./ha in 100 liters of water or 0.56 oz. a.i./acre in 100 gallons of water) were statistically equivalent in managing bacterial spot of tomato without significantly reducing yield compared with the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial spot on tomato caused by four distinct Xanthomonas spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly ASM at 75 to 200 μM did not significantly reduce yield versus untreated control.

Treatment
Weekly ASM applications at rates as low as 75 μMe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
without significantly reducinge0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weekly ASM applications at rates as low as 75 μM (equivalent to 1.58 g a.i./ha in 100 liters of water or 0.21 oz. a.i./acre in 100 gallons of water) to 200 μM (equivalent to 4.20 g a.i./ha in 100 liters of water or 0.56 oz. a.i./acre in 100 gallons of water) were statistically equivalent in managing bacterial spot of tomato without significantly reducing yield compared with the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 144–150 · show in text ↑

acibenzolar-S-methyl · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

acibenzolar-S-methyl · Xanthomonas · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.