Paper · 2000 · Weed Technology

Weed Control and Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Yield with Banded Herbicides and Cultivation1

ROBIN R. BELLINDER; JONATHAN J. KIRKWYLAND; RUSSELL W. WALLACE; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments compared the effect on weed control and potato yield of banded applications of metolachlor plus linuron with or without flex-tine, rolling, and shovel cultivation prior to hilling. Cultivation without banded herbicide resulted in greater prehilling in- and between-row weed densities and reduced late-season weed control as compared to broadcast herbicides or cultivation with banded herbicides. Although the flex-tine and rolling cultivators were expected to provide improved in-row weed control, there were few differences between these and the other cultivation implements. Despite reduced weed control with cultivation alone, potato yields were not reduced.Nomenclature: Linuron, N′-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methoxy-N-methylurea; metolachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEAL; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSA; redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMARE; yellow foxtail, Setaria glauca (L.) Beauv. # SETLU; potato, Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Katahdin’.Additional index words: Flex-tine cultivator, herbicide reduction, mechanical weed control.Abbreviations: DAP, days after planting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivation alone produced greater prehilling in- and between-row weed densities than broadcast herbicides or cultivation with banded herbicides.

Treatment
Cultivation without banded herbicidee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
prehilling in- and between-row weed densitiese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
broadcast herbicides or cultivation with banded herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation without banded herbicide resulted in greater prehilling in- and between-row weed densities and reduced late-season weed control as compared to broadcast herbicides or cultivation with banded herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–407 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivation alone reduced late-season weed control relative to broadcast herbicides or cultivation with banded herbicides.

Treatment
Cultivation without banded herbicidee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
late-season weed controle0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
broadcast herbicides or cultivation with banded herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation without banded herbicide resulted in greater prehilling in- and between-row weed densities and reduced late-season weed control as compared to broadcast herbicides or cultivation with banded herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–407 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flex-tine and rolling cultivators showed few differences from other cultivation implements in in-row weed control.

Treatment
flex-tine and rolling cultivatorse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
in-row weed controle0
Direction
few differencese0
Comparator
other cultivation implementse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the flex-tine and rolling cultivators were expected to provide improved in-row weed control, there were few differences between these and the other cultivation implements.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivation alone did not reduce potato yield despite poorer weed control.

Treatment
cultivation alonee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
potato yieldse0
Direction
not reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Despite reduced weed control with cultivation alone, potato yields were not reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–673 · show in text ↑

herbicide · weed · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 40 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.