Paper · 2012 · Biologia Plantarum

Ameliorative effect of melatonin on meristematic cells of chilled and re-warmed Vigna radiata roots

K. Szafrańska; S. Glińska; K. M. Janas

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
49
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Changes in ultrastructure of meristematic cells as well as growth and lipid peroxidation in roots of 3-d-old seedlings obtained from control (C), hydroprimed (H) and hydroprimed with melatonin (H-MEL) seeds after 2 d of incubation at 25 or 5 °C and 2 d of re-warming after chilling were investigated. Under 25 °C hydropriming (H and H-MEL) inhibited root growth, but after chilling and re-warming a positive MEL effect on root elongation was observed. The results show decreased lipid peroxidation in H-MEL roots already after chilling, but the significant extent of MEL impact was seen after re-warming. Similarly at the ultrastructural level, the protective effect of MEL at chilling was also visible, especially in plastids, and this effect maintained also after re-warming.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydropriming inhibited root growth at 25 °C.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
hydropriming (H and H-MEL)e0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Setting
25 °Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under 25 °C hydropriming (H and H-MEL) inhibited root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melatonin promoted root elongation after chilling and rewarming.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
MELe0
Outcome
root elongatione0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
after chilling and re-warminge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“after chilling and re-warming a positive MEL effect on root elongation was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melatonin decreased root lipid peroxidation after chilling.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
H-MELe0
Outcome
lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
after chillinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“decreased lipid peroxidation in H-MEL roots already after chilling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Melatonin had a significant impact on lipid peroxidation after rewarming.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
MELe0
Outcome
MEL impacte0
Qualifier
after re-warminge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“the significant extent of MEL impact was seen after re-warming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melatonin protected plastid ultrastructure during chilling and after rewarming.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
plastidse0
Treatment
MELe0
Outcome
protective effecte0
Qualifier
after re-warminge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“the protective effect of MEL at chilling was also visible, especially in plastids, and this effect maintained also after re-warming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–776 · show in text ↑

melatonin · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

melatonin · physiology: oxidative · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 53 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.