Paper · 1999 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Recycling of crop wastes and green manure and their impact on yield and nutrient uptake of wetland rice

VINOD KUMAR; B. C. GHOSH; RAVI BHAT

15
claims
38
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The potential for using crop wastes as a source of nutrients on the yields of rice grown under submerged conditions was studied in both field and pot experiments at the Experimental Farm of the Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur during 1992/93 and 1993/94. The application of groundnut haulm at 3·0 t/ha, maize stover at 5·0 t/ha, mustard stover at 3·0 t/ha and green manure at 1·5 t/ha contributed considerable amounts of nutrients, which improved components of yield, yield and nutrient uptake by rice and also improved the organic carbon (OC) content and available N, P and K in the soil. Yields and soil fertility were both further improved when these organic materials were combined with inorganic fertilizer to supply the recommended amounts of nutrients, except that inorganic fertilizer alone did not cause an increase in the OC content of the soil. In the pot experiment, the production of NH 4 -N and NO 3 -N was both larger and more consistent when organic and inorganic nutrient sources were added together than when inorganic sources alone were used.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of groundnut haulm at 3·0 t/ha improved components of yield, yield and nutrient uptake by rice.

Treatment
groundnut haulm at 3·0 t/hae1
Outcome
components of yield, yield and nutrient uptakee2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“groundnut haulm at 3·0 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved components of yield, yield and nutrient uptake by rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of maize stover at 5·0 t/ha improved components of yield, yield and nutrient uptake by rice.

Treatment
maize stover at 5·0 t/hae1
Outcome
components of yield, yield and nutrient uptakee2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize stover at 5·0 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–382 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved components of yield, yield and nutrient uptake by rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of mustard stover at 3·0 t/ha improved components of yield, yield and nutrient uptake by rice.

Treatment
mustard stover at 3·0 t/hae1
Outcome
components of yield, yield and nutrient uptakee2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mustard stover at 3·0 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–410 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved components of yield, yield and nutrient uptake by rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of green manure at 1·5 t/ha improved components of yield, yield and nutrient uptake by rice.

Treatment
green manure at 1·5 t/hae1
Outcome
components of yield, yield and nutrient uptakee2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“green manure at 1·5 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–439 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved components of yield, yield and nutrient uptake by rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of groundnut haulm at 3·0 t/ha improved soil organic carbon content.

Taxon
wetland ricet0
Treatment
groundnut haulm at 3·0 t/hae1
Outcome
organic carbon (OC) contente2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“wetland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut haulm at 3·0 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved the organic carbon (OC) content and available N, P and K in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of maize stover at 5·0 t/ha improved soil organic carbon content.

Taxon
wetland ricet0
Treatment
maize stover at 5·0 t/hae1
Outcome
organic carbon (OC) contente2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“wetland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize stover at 5·0 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–382 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved the organic carbon (OC) content and available N, P and K in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of mustard stover at 3·0 t/ha improved soil organic carbon content.

Taxon
wetland ricet0
Treatment
mustard stover at 3·0 t/hae1
Outcome
organic carbon (OC) contente2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“wetland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“mustard stover at 3·0 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–410 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved the organic carbon (OC) content and available N, P and K in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of green manure at 1·5 t/ha improved soil organic carbon content.

Taxon
wetland ricet0
Treatment
green manure at 1·5 t/hae1
Outcome
organic carbon (OC) contente2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“wetland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“green manure at 1·5 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–439 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved the organic carbon (OC) content and available N, P and K in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of groundnut haulm at 3·0 t/ha improved available N, P and K in the soil.

Taxon
wetland ricet0
Treatment
groundnut haulm at 3·0 t/hae1
Outcome
available N, P and Ke2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“wetland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“groundnut haulm at 3·0 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–356 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved the organic carbon (OC) content and available N, P and K in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of maize stover at 5·0 t/ha improved available N, P and K in the soil.

Taxon
wetland ricet0
Treatment
maize stover at 5·0 t/hae1
Outcome
available N, P and Ke2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“wetland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize stover at 5·0 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–382 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved the organic carbon (OC) content and available N, P and K in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of mustard stover at 3·0 t/ha improved available N, P and K in the soil.

Taxon
wetland ricet0
Treatment
mustard stover at 3·0 t/hae1
Outcome
available N, P and Ke2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“wetland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“mustard stover at 3·0 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–410 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved the organic carbon (OC) content and available N, P and K in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of green manure at 1·5 t/ha improved available N, P and K in the soil.

Taxon
wetland ricet0
Treatment
green manure at 1·5 t/hae1
Outcome
available N, P and Ke2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“wetland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“green manure at 1·5 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–439 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved the organic carbon (OC) content and available N, P and K in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields and soil fertility were further improved when the organic materials were combined with inorganic fertilizer supplying the recommended nutrient amounts.

Taxon
wetland ricet0
Treatment
combined with inorganic fertilizere1
Outcome
Yields and soil fertilitye1
Direction
further improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“wetland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yields and soil fertility were both further improved when these organic materials were combined with inorganic fertilizer to supply the recommended amounts of nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer alone did not increase the soil organic carbon content.

Taxon
wetland ricet0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizer alonee1
Outcome
OC content of the soile1
Direction
did not cause an increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“wetland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“inorganic fertilizer alone did not cause an increase in the OC content of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–909 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the pot experiment, production of NH4-N and NO3-N was larger and more consistent when organic and inorganic nutrient sources were added together than with inorganic sources alone.

Taxon
wetland ricet0
Treatment
organic and inorganic nutrient sources were added togethere1
Outcome
production of NH 4 -N and NO 3 -Ne1
Direction
largere1
Comparator
inorganic sources alonee1
Setting
pot experimente1

Verbatim

t0

“wetland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the pot experiment, the production of NH 4 -N and NO 3 -N was both larger and more consistent when organic and inorganic nutrient sources were added together than when inorganic sources alone were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1115 · show in text ↑

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Zea mays · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.