Paper · 2001 · Plant Disease

Rice Blast Epidemics Initiated by Infested Rice Grain on the Soil Surface

D. H. Long; J. C. Correll; F. N. Lee; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1996 and 1997 with a marked strain of Pyricularia grisea to determine if inoculum from infested rice grain could cause primary infections and sustain a rice blast epidemic during the growing season by giving rise to leaf, collar, and neck symptoms. The marked strain, a sulfate nonutilizing (sul) mutant of P. grisea, was grown on autoclaved rice seed for 7 days at 25°C. Infested rice grains were applied to the soil surface at the time of plant emergence (approximately 10 days after planting) at densities of 0, 0.5, 5, 25, and 50 grains per 0.1 m 2 in plots planted to the blast susceptible cv. M-201. Leaf blast symptoms were first detected in the plots containing infested grain 35 days after plant emergence in both 1996 and 1997. The sul mutant was isolated from more than 90% of the lesions sampled from rice seedlings 35 to 45 days after plant emergence. Leaf blast increased more rapidly in plots with 25 and 50 infested grains per 0.1 m 2 than in plots with less inoculum pressure (0.5 and 25 infested grains per 0.1 m 2 ), although in 1996, leaf blast incidence recorded at midseason in plots containing 0.5 and 5 infested grains per 0.1 m 2 was 41 and 55%, respectively. At the end of both seasons, the sul mutant was recovered from over 90% of the leaf, collar, and neck blast lesions except for one sample date in 1996. Rice blast was not detected in the control plots (no infested grain) in 1997 and not until 65 days after planting in 1996. Comparisons of disease progress on leaves between the marked strain and the parental wild-type strain under field conditions indicated that development of disease caused by the sul mutant was similar to disease caused by the wild-type strain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf blast first appeared in infested-grain plots 35 days after plant emergence in both years.

Treatment
infested graine0
Outcome
Leaf blast symptomse0
Value
35 dayse0
Setting
plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf blast symptoms were first detected in the plots containing infested grain 35 days after plant emergence in both 1996 and 1997.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Blast Epidemics Initiated by Infested Rice Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The marked pathogen was isolated from more than 90% of sampled rice seedling lesions at 35–45 days after emergence.

Interactor
P. griseaPyricularia griseae1pathogen
Outcome
sul mutant was isolatede0
Value
more than 90%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyricularia grisea
Pyricularia grisea · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sul mutant was isolated from more than 90% of the lesions sampled from rice seedlings 35 to 45 days after plant emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–900 · show in text ↑
e1

“a sulfate nonutilizing (sul) mutant of P. grisea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–352 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Blast Epidemics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf blast increased more rapidly at 25 and 50 infested grains per 0.1 m 2 than under lower inoculum pressure.

Treatment
25 and 50 infested grains per 0.1 m 2e0
Outcome
Leaf blaste0
Direction
increased more rapidlye0
Comparator
less inoculum pressuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf blast increased more rapidly in plots with 25 and 50 infested grains per 0.1 m 2 than in plots with less inoculum pressure (0.5 and 25 infested grains per 0.1 m 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Blast Epidemics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1996, midseason leaf blast incidence was 41% at 0.5 infested grains per 0.1 m 2.

Treatment
0.5e0
Outcome
leaf blast incidencee0
Value
41e0
Qualifier
at midseasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 1996, leaf blast incidence recorded at midseason in plots containing 0.5 and 5 infested grains per 0.1 m 2 was 41 and 55%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Blast Epidemics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1996, midseason leaf blast incidence was 55% at 5 infested grains per 0.1 m 2.

Treatment
5 infested grains per 0.1 m 2e0
Outcome
leaf blast incidencee0
Value
55%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 1996, leaf blast incidence recorded at midseason in plots containing 0.5 and 5 infested grains per 0.1 m 2 was 41 and 55%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Blast Epidemics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The marked mutant was recovered from over 90% of leaf, collar and neck blast lesions at the end of both seasons, apart from one 1996 sample date.

Interactor
P. griseaPyricularia griseae1pathogen
Outcome
sul mutant was recoverede0
Value
over 90%e0
Qualifier
except for one sample date in 1996e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyricularia grisea
Pyricularia grisea · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the end of both seasons, the sul mutant was recovered from over 90% of the leaf, collar, and neck blast lesions except for one sample date in 1996.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1371 · show in text ↑
e1

“a sulfate nonutilizing (sul) mutant of P. grisea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–352 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Blast Epidemics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice blast was absent in untreated control plots in 1997 and appeared only 65 days after planting in 1996.

Outcome
Rice blast was not detectede0
Value
65 dayse0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice blast was not detected in the control plots (no infested grain) in 1997 and not until 65 days after planting in 1996.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease development caused by the sul mutant was similar to that caused by the wild-type strain in field comparisons.

Treatment
sul mutante0
Outcome
development of diseasee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
wild-type straine0
Setting
field conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“development of disease caused by the sul mutant was similar to disease caused by the wild-type strain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1737 · show in text ↑
e1

“under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Blast Epidemics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–20 · show in text ↑

infection · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 15 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.