Abstract
A triplicate field experiment laid out in randomized complete block design was conducted to evaluate different humic acid (HA) application methods at Agricultural Research Farm, of KPK Agricultural University, Peshawar. Three methods of HA application: seed priming, foliar spray and soil application were included in the experiment. Humic acid application methods significantly affected pods plant-1, grains pod-1, 1000 grain weights, and grain yield whereas biological yield was not significantly affected by HA application methods. Humic acid application at the rate of 3 kg·ha-1 resulted in higher number of pods plant-1, thousand grain weights and grain yield, however it was statistically similar to the treatments where HA was soil applied at rate of 1 and 2 kg·ha-1, seed priming with 0% (water soaked), 1%, 2% HA solution and foliar spray with 0.01%, 0.05% and 0.1% of HA solution. It is concluded that HA application in all the three methods significantly enhances grain yield and yield components of mungbean.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid application methods significantly affected pods per plant, grains per pod and 1000-grain weight of mungbean.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- Humic acid application methodse1
- Outcome
- pods plant-1, grains pod-1, 1000 grain weightse1
- Setting
- Agricultural Research Farm, of KPK Agricultural University, Peshaware0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean”
e0“A triplicate field experiment laid out in randomized complete block design was conducted to evaluate different humic acid (HA) application methods at Agricultural Research Farm, of KPK Agricultural University, Peshawar”
e1“Humic acid application methods significantly affected pods plant-1, grains pod-1, 1000 grain weights, and grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid application methods significantly affected grain yield of mungbean.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Humic acid application methodse1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean”
e1“Humic acid application methods significantly affected pods plant-1, grains pod-1, 1000 grain weights, and grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Biological yield of mungbean was not significantly affected by humic acid application methods.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- HA application methodse2
- Outcome
- biological yielde2
- Direction
- not significantly affectede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean”
e2“biological yield was not significantly affected by HA application methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid applied at the rate of 3 resulted in higher pods per plant, thousand grain weight and grain yield in mungbean.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Humic acid application at the rate of 3e4
- Outcome
- number of pods plant-1, thousand grain weights and grain yielde3
- Direction
- highere3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean”
e4“Humic acid application at the rate of 3”
e3“resulted in higher number of pods plant-1, thousand grain weights and grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid at the rate of 3 was statistically similar to soil application at 1 and 2 and to seed priming and foliar spray treatments in mungbean.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Humic acid application at the rate of 3e4
- Outcome
- number of pods plant-1, thousand grain weights and grain yielde3
- Direction
- statistically similare5
- Qualifier
- seed priming with 0% (water soaked), 1%, 2% HA solution and foliar spray with 0.01%, 0.05% and 0.1% of HA solutione6
- Comparator
- HA was soil applied at rate of 1 and 2e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean”
e4“Humic acid application at the rate of 3”
e3“resulted in higher number of pods plant-1, thousand grain weights and grain yield”
e5“it was statistically similar to the treatments where HA was soil applied at rate of 1 and 2”
e6“seed priming with 0% (water soaked), 1%, 2% HA solution and foliar spray with 0.01%, 0.05% and 0.1% of HA solution”
The same questions in other papers
other · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.