Abstract
The effect of seed treatment, seed size, incorporated organic matter, and method of shelling on the establishment of peanuts at Katherine, N.T. was studied during two seasons, 1965-66 and 1966-67. Mechanical damage to the seed during machine shelling was one of the main causes of poor establishment : the larger seed was more vulnerable and the smaller grades of mature, well-filled seed may be preferable. Seed treatments that included 'Ceresan' (phenyl mercury acetate) overcame much of the damage caused by machine shelling. It was concluded that the seed treatments gave protection against fungal infection when the testa had been damaged but could not rectify damage to the radicle. Seasonal conditions after sowing were very important in determining the level of establishment, and the relative efficiency of seed treatment was greater under adverse conditions. Incorporated organic matter had no marked effect on establishment, although peanut residue caused a small but significant reduction.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Machine shelling damage was a main cause of poor peanut establishment.
- Taxon
- peanuts
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- machine shellinge0
- Outcome
- poor establishmente0
- Direction
- poore0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Mechanical damage to the seed during machine shelling was one of the main causes of poor establishment”
t0“peanuts ( Arachis hypogaea )”
Claim · model-written summary
Larger peanut seed was more vulnerable to machine-shelling damage.
- Taxon
- peanuts
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Material
- larger seede0
- Treatment
- machine shellinge1
- Outcome
- vulnerablee0
- Direction
- more vulnerablee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the larger seed was more vulnerable and the smaller grades of mature, well-filled seed may be preferable.”
e1“Mechanical damage to the seed during machine shelling was one of the main causes of poor establishment”
t0“peanuts ( Arachis hypogaea )”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatments including 'Ceresan' overcame much machine-shelling damage.
- Taxon
- peanuts
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- Seed treatments that included 'Ceresan'e0
- Outcome
- damage caused by machine shellinge0
- Direction
- overcamee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Seed treatments that included 'Ceresan' (phenyl mercury acetate) overcame much of the damage caused by machine shelling.”
t0“peanuts ( Arachis hypogaea )”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment protected damaged peanut testa against fungal infection.
- Taxon
- peanuts
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Organ / stage
- testae0
- Treatment
- seed treatmentse0
- Outcome
- protection against fungal infectione0
- Qualifier
- when the testa had been damagede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the seed treatments gave protection against fungal infection when the testa had been damaged”
t0“peanuts ( Arachis hypogaea )”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment could not rectify radicle damage in peanuts.
- Taxon
- peanuts
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- seed treatmentse1
- Outcome
- damage to the radiclee0
- Direction
- could not rectifye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“could not rectify damage to the radicle”
e1“the seed treatments gave protection against fungal infection when the testa had been damaged but could not rectify damage to the radicle.”
t0“peanuts ( Arachis hypogaea )”
Claim · model-written summary
Seasonal conditions after sowing strongly determined peanut establishment.
- Taxon
- peanuts
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Outcome
- level of establishmente0
- Setting
- Seasonal conditions after sowinge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Seasonal conditions after sowing were very important in determining the level of establishment”
t0“peanuts ( Arachis hypogaea )”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment was relatively more efficient under adverse conditions.
- Taxon
- peanuts
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- seed treatmente0
- Outcome
- relative efficiency of seed treatmente0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Setting
- adverse conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the relative efficiency of seed treatment was greater under adverse conditions.”
t0“peanuts ( Arachis hypogaea )”
Claim · model-written summary
Incorporated organic matter had no marked effect on peanut establishment.
- Taxon
- peanuts
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- Incorporated organic mattere0
- Outcome
- establishmente0
- Direction
- no marked effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Incorporated organic matter had no marked effect on establishment”
t0“peanuts ( Arachis hypogaea )”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut residue caused a small but significant reduction in establishment.
- Taxon
- peanuts
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- peanut residuee0
- Outcome
- establishmente1
- Direction
- reductione0
- Qualifier
- smalle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“although peanut residue caused a small but significant reduction.”
e1“Incorporated organic matter had no marked effect on establishment”
t0“peanuts ( Arachis hypogaea )”
The same questions in other papers
organic · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →seed treatment · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.