Paper · 1999 · Journal of Applied Microbiology

Carbon fractions in the rhizosphere of pea inoculated with 2,4 diacetylphloroglucinol producing and non-producing Pseudomonas fluorescens F113

D. C. Naseby; J. A. Pascual; J. M. Lynch

12
claims
36
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The aim of this work was to determine the effect of wild type and functionally modified Pseudomonas fluorescens strains on C fractions in the rhizosphere of pea. The lacZY marked F113 strain produces the antibiotic 2,4 diacetylphloroglucinol (DAPG) useful in plant disease control. The modified strain of F113 was represented in production of DAPG, creating the DAPG negative strain F113 G22. The F113 treatment resulted in a significantly lower shoot/root ratio. The F113 G22 treatment had a significantly greater indigenous and total fluorescent Pseudomonas population than the control and F113 (DAPG+) treatment. Both strains significantly increased the water soluble carbohydrates and the total water soluble carbon in the pea rhizosphere soil. Strain F113 significantly increased the soil protein content relative to the control, but not in relation to the F113 G22 treatment. The F113 treatment had a significantly greater organic acid content than the control and F113 G22 treatments, whilst the F113 G22 treatment was also significantly greater than the control. Both inocula resulted in significantly lower phosphate contents than the control. The F113 inocula significantly increased alkaline phosphatase, sulphatase and urease activities, and reduced β glucosidase activities indicating increased carbon availability. Both inocula increased C availability ; however, antibiotic production by strain F113 reduced the utilisation of organic acids released from the plant resulting in differing effects of the two strains on nutrient availability, plant growth, soil enzyme activities and Pseudomonas populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F113 treatment significantly lowered the pea shoot/root ratio.

Treatment
F113 treatmente1
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense2symbiont
Outcome
shoot/root ratioe1
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere of pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“The F113 treatment resulted in a significantly lower shoot/root ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–462 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pseudomonas fluorescens strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F113 G22 increased indigenous and total fluorescent Pseudomonas populations relative to control and F113.

Treatment
F113 G22 treatmente1
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase1symbiont
Outcome
indigenous and total fluorescent Pseudomonas populatione1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
the control and F113 (DAPG+) treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere of pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“The F113 G22 treatment had a significantly greater indigenous and total fluorescent Pseudomonas population than the control and F113 (DAPG+) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both strains significantly increased water soluble carbohydrates and total water soluble carbon in pea rhizosphere soil.

Treatment
Both strainse0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense1symbiont
Outcome
water soluble carbohydrates and the total water soluble carbon in the pea rhizosphere soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both strains significantly increased the water soluble carbohydrates and the total water soluble carbon in the pea rhizosphere soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–747 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas fluorescens strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F113 increased soil protein content relative to control but not relative to F113 G22.

Treatment
Strain F113e1
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense2symbiont
Outcome
soil protein contente1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
but not in relation to the F113 G22 treatmente1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere of pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“Strain F113 significantly increased the soil protein content relative to the control, but not in relation to the F113 G22 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–880 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pseudomonas fluorescens strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F113 increased organic acid content relative to control and F113 G22.

Treatment
F113 treatmente1
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense2symbiont
Outcome
organic acid contente1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
the control and F113 G22 treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere of pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“The F113 treatment had a significantly greater organic acid content than the control and F113 G22 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–990 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pseudomonas fluorescens strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F113 G22 increased organic acid content relative to control.

Treatment
F113 G22 treatmente1
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense3symbiont
Outcome
organic acid contente2
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere of pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“the F113 G22 treatment was also significantly greater than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1069 · show in text ↑
e2

“organic acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–949 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pseudomonas fluorescens strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both inocula lowered phosphate content relative to control.

Treatment
Both inoculae1
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense2symbiont
Outcome
phosphate contentse1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere of pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both inocula resulted in significantly lower phosphate contents than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1151 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pseudomonas fluorescens strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F113 increased alkaline phosphatase, sulphatase, and urease activities.

Treatment
F113 inoculae1
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense2symbiont
Outcome
alkaline phosphatase, sulphatase and urease activitiese1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere of pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“The F113 inocula significantly increased alkaline phosphatase, sulphatase and urease activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1248 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pseudomonas fluorescens strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F113 reduced beta glucosidase activity.

Treatment
F113 inoculae1
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense2symbiont
Outcome
β glucosidase activitiese1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere of pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“The F113 inocula significantly increased alkaline phosphatase, sulphatase and urease activities, and reduced β glucosidase activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1286 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pseudomonas fluorescens strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both inocula increased carbon availability.

Treatment
Both inoculae1
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense2symbiont
Outcome
C availabilitye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere of pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both inocula increased C availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1366 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pseudomonas fluorescens strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Antibiotic production by F113 reduced utilization of organic acids released from pea.

Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense2symbiont
Outcome
utilisation of organic acids released from the plante1
Qualifier
antibiotic production by strain F113e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere of pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“antibiotic production by strain F113 reduced the utilisation of organic acids released from the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1479 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pseudomonas fluorescens strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that F113 antibiotic production caused strain differences in nutrient availability, plant growth, soil enzymes, and Pseudomonas populations.

Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense3symbiont
Outcome
differing effects of the two strains on nutrient availability, plant growth, soil enzyme activities and Pseudomonas populationse1
Qualifier
antibiotic production by strain F113e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere of pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“resulting in differing effects of the two strains on nutrient availability, plant growth, soil enzyme activities and Pseudomonas populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1620 · show in text ↑
e2

“antibiotic production by strain F113 reduced the utilisation of organic acids released from the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1479 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pseudomonas fluorescens strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–119 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Pseudomonas fluorescens · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.