Paper · 2000 · Plant Production Science

Genotypic Variation in Response of Rainfed Lowland Rice to Drought and Rewatering

Tahere Azhiri- Sigari; Akira Yamauchi; Akihiko Kamoshita; et al.

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
115
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Genotypic variation in the root system is a potential source for improving drought tolerance of rainfed lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.). Our work aimed at characterizing both constitutive root traits (those present under well -watered conditions) and adaptive root traits (those developed in response to drought and rewatering) among eight diverse rice genotypes in three sets of greenhouse experiments (experiments 1, 2, and 3). Under well–watered conditions, genotypic variation was observed in root to shoot ratio, root growth rate, specific root length, deep root ratio, root mass per tiller, and root thickness. CT9993 and IR58821 had a high root to shoot ratio, deep and thick root system, and high root mass per tiller. However, CT9993 had a slow root growth rate and short specific root length. In response to drought in experiments 2 and 3, the total amount of assimilate distributed to roots was reduced and roots became thinner, but the proportion of total assimilate supply assigned to deeper layers increased, thereby maintaining deep root mass and increasing specific root length. On rewatering, root to shoot ratio increased, surface roots increased, and roots became thicker. During drought, NSG19, KDML105, Mahsuri, and IR58821 partitioned a larger proportion of assimilate to deep roots and had more deep root branching.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root to shoot ratio, root growth rate, specific root length, deep root ratio, root mass per tiller, and root thickness varied among genotypes when watered.

Outcome
genotypic variatione0
Qualifier
Under well–watered conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under well–watered conditions, genotypic variation was observed in root to shoot ratio, root growth rate, specific root length, deep root ratio, root mass per tiller, and root thickness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CT9993 had a high root to shoot ratio, deep and thick roots, and high root mass per tiller.

Material
CT9993e0
Outcome
high root to shoot ratio, deep and thick root system, and high root mass per tillere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CT9993 and IR58821 had a high root to shoot ratio, deep and thick root system, and high root mass per tiller.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR58821 had a high root to shoot ratio, deep and thick roots, and high root mass per tiller.

Material
IR58821e0
Outcome
high root to shoot ratio, deep and thick root system, and high root mass per tillere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CT9993 and IR58821 had a high root to shoot ratio, deep and thick root system, and high root mass per tiller.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CT9993 had slow root growth and short specific root length.

Material
CT9993e0
Outcome
slow root growth rate and short specific root lengthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CT9993 had a slow root growth rate and short specific root length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced assimilate distributed to roots.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
total amount of assimilate distributed to rootse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In response to drought in experiments 2 and 3, the total amount of assimilate distributed to roots was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought made roots thinner.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
thinnere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In response to drought in experiments 2 and 3, the total amount of assimilate distributed to roots was reduced and roots became thinner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased the assimilate proportion assigned to deeper layers.

Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
proportion of total assimilate supply assigned to deeper layerse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the proportion of total assimilate supply assigned to deeper layers increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“In response to drought in experiments 2 and 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep root mass was maintained under drought.

Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
deep root masse0
Direction
maintaininge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thereby maintaining deep root mass and increasing specific root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“In response to drought in experiments 2 and 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific root length increased under drought.

Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
specific root lengthe0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thereby maintaining deep root mass and increasing specific root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“In response to drought in experiments 2 and 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rewatering increased root to shoot ratio and surface roots.

Treatment
rewateringe0
Outcome
root to shoot ratio increased, surface rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On rewatering, root to shoot ratio increased, surface roots increased, and roots became thicker.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rewatering made roots thicker.

Treatment
rewateringe0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
thickere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On rewatering, root to shoot ratio increased, surface roots increased, and roots became thicker.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During drought NSG19, KDML105, Mahsuri, and IR58821 had greater deep-root assimilate partitioning and branching.

Outcome
larger proportion of assimilate to deep roots and had more deep root branchinge0
Qualifier
During droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During drought, NSG19, KDML105, Mahsuri, and IR58821 partitioned a larger proportion of assimilate to deep roots and had more deep root branching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–55 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

282 papers: 98 positive, 184 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 182 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

278 papers more in this group

See all 282 papers →

rewatering · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.